please help me understand

>>32252025
see all them mini coopers?

see all that shit people put on em?

same concept

File: Git.png (850KB, 602x713px) Image search: [Google]

850KB, 602x713px

>>32252025
>cuck

>>32252025
aftermarket parts? such as what?

...they are still excellent guns, dispite being semi
The smart ones build them the way they want from the start. They are the customizable pc of the gun world.

File: 1331495429076.png (339KB, 442x622px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 442x622px

>M16
>M4
>AR15

None of these are machine guns, but I wouldn't expect OP to know what words mean.

>>32252025
>Not becoming the ultimate High-Speed Low-Drag operator with Magpul™ accessories
It's almost like you are a giant faggot

>>32252025
Semi-auto is better for shootin' and actually hittin'. Plus, they're fun, they're Legos for adults. Like another anon said, it's like people modifying cars, at their base they're the same, your new suspension and built engine isn't going to win you the Le Mans, but they're a fun hobby.

>>32252132
The National Firearms Act would like to have a word with you.

>>32252158
The National Firearms act doesn't truly represent the nature of firearms, in fact it represents politics- just like the OP, who used this as a thinly veiled bait thread to try to get people mad on /k/.

>>>/pol/
Move this to where it belongs.

File: 1473991915467.jpg (121KB, 736x559px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 736x559px

>>32252025
I know, I know, we all hate options and customizing shit to suit our own personal needs and likings.

I bet your just a hoot at parties comisar fudd fuck.

OPTIONS ARE THE DEVIL!

>>32252025
Low quality bait, KYS faggot.

>>32252025
The first post actually provides an adequate answer.

Its people who care more about looking cool and showing off than being effective. An effective person would buy a battle rifle and float the barrel and get a modest optic, and hand load for exact precise consistency with each round. Their gun would look inconspicuous and fairly standard.