Open wide, America. Here comes the aeroplane!

Oh boy, we lost a carrier, we've only got another 20 of them!

>>32241439
>Tomcats on the flight deck
When did Iran get a carrier?

>>32241439
>Another Chink shill thread

This is all damage control from the J-20 thread where obvious Chink propaganda posting got BTFO hard. Fuck off China, you're done.

>>32241476
>got BTFO hard

Ahahaha, no.

I read parts of that thread and all I saw was Americans losing ground against facts that has sources.

File: aegissm-3evolution.png (194KB, 1185x891px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1185x891px

>>32241439
???

>>32241476
>Some samefag posting irrelevant Mao era stories
>BTFO
lol no

>>32241462

>lost

Nah

They only have the KE of a Harpoon missile

Not to mention I doubt they'll even be able to hit a moving carrier

They need nukes to be a serious threat

>>32241439
>It flies in the air
>hurr it'sa aero playne govnah
Fucking europoors

File: b23[1].png (473KB, 600x706px) Image search: [Google]

473KB, 600x706px

>>32241586
>he was never a child

>>32241547

One American can kill 30 chinks. Better stop running over your toddlers and not noticing.

>>32241439

Please do excuse me. But what you're actually referring to in your OP is indeed, not an aeroplane. It is in fact a warhead.

>>32241592
I don't know about you but my mother said AIRplane not AEROplane, because she wasn't one of the queens retarded children

>>32241580
>I don't know what is top attack
>Carrier is undeadable, just like Abrams )))

>>32241547
Not from either country but most of the sourced facts come straight from China, the same military claiming that the out of control tumble for a reentry test was "evasive manouvers".

At least the fatniks will say "oops shit caught fire, please gibs more money to not be on fire"

>>32241573
The stories are just ever increasing icing on the cake of fail that is china

>>32241602
Nobody said they were. But it's much harder to kill a carrier than people think. Not to mention it comes with the inherent risk of escalation.

>>32241439
And then the MIRVs rained down upon the earth!

>>32241547
Enjoy trying to find a woman, wang!

Better get that invasion fleet ready before all the males in your country are over 50.
By then all the females in your country will be Vietnamese or euro whores!

>>32241740
>euro whores

Ew, have you even seen most asian women?

>>32241602

Frankly, I kind of hope the chinks do sink a carrier. We'd finally get to bathe them in nuclear hellfire, and take their wives, daughters, and mothers to fill our unquenchable thirst for anal gape porn.

>>32241724
More than likely we shoot a bunch of cruise missiles at the three gorges dam. 20 million drowned chinese, loss of electricity to large portions of China, shit ton of farm land becomes flooded and useless. It is the last thing that would do the most damage, they can barely feed their population as is.

>>32241439
Enjoy your 30 minutes.

>>32241832
This. China has the national equivalent of a glass jaw, because if even a few strike planes get through and a few 2000lb Paveways hit the Three Gorges, they are done. China is the only country I can think of that could be devastated on a national scale by a single weapon without resorting to nuclear.

>>32241439
>2016
>using suborbital conventional weapons

NORAD isn't going to be able to tell the difference between a nuclear first strike or a anti ship ballistic missile.

unless China has fueled their nuclear missiles ahead of time. they are going to face getting plastered with nuclear weapons before they can even launch a nuclear response.

>>32241832
>>32243114
>hurr durr every country is iraq

And just how do you intend to launch a strike thousands of miles deep within heavily defended airspace?

>>32243432
Oh I dunno, maybe use some of the LITERALLY THOUSANDS of stealth strike fighters we will have in the next decade?

If just a dozen of those get through and hit the damn with LGBs, China is fucked.

>>32243448
Strike on Three Gorges will:
1. Not destroy dam
2. Result in PRC nuclear response

Go ahead, America. End yourselves.

>>32243524
PRC nuclear response will:
Result in larger American nuclear response
Go ahead China, End yourselves

>>32243524
>1. Not destroy dam
Is it made out of mythic indestructible magic communist concrete? No, just normal concrete?
Then enough 2000lb bunker busters hitting the right spots will destroy it.

>2. Result in PRC nuclear response
Two problems with that. First of all, China is VERY proud of its No First Use policy.

Secondly, the Chinese nuclear arsenal is pathetic compared to the US arsenal. It is smaller, it is less survivable and the delivery vehicles are less accurate/have less range. Getting into a nuclear war with the US is the last thing China would ever want.

>>32241564
>Currently
Saturation attack
>Near future
Anti-ABM-missiles flying in tandem with the attacking missile
>Future
Balistic missiles with lasers to shoot down enemy missiles

File: _Laughs_in_American_.jpg (15KB, 374x378px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 374x378px

>China
>most water is polluted beyond being drinkable and tons of air pollution resulting in a sickly population
>have to import food to feed themselves
>"muh Chinese economy" only makes cheap shitty goods and nothing of quality. Losing jobs due to work moving to Brazil and Vietnam, not to mention it's currently sitting on a huge housing bubble ready to burst
>can only copy American vehicles. Immitate and never innovate
>run by CCP, which is riddles with so much corruption that the officials are more concerned with purging their rivals than developing their shit nation
>PLA is also incredibly corrupt
>Chinese conscripts are so unhealthy and lazy that standards had to be lowered twice in this decade
>no combat experience, last time PLA was deployed was Tienneman square
>Chinas one ((1)) aircraft is a Ukranian refurb that they can't even get to work
Oh man, we're terrifed

>>32243635
>visible discontent, the post

>>32243641
*aircraft carrier

File: 1463586278525.jpg (13KB, 200x208px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 200x208px

>>32243524

the US would respond with an equal nuclear strike or escalate massively by destroying china's liquid fueled ICBM fields before they can reach ready to fire condition

post chinese superiority

You're all fucking stupid.

File: greatleapforward.jpg (1MB, 3500x2029px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3500x2029px

>>32243684

File: article-0-012B17C300000578-896_468x600[1].jpg (50KB, 468x600px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 468x600px

>>32243641
>Chinese conscripts are so unhealthy and lazy that standards had to be lowered twice in this decade
You forgot caring more about how they look in parade than how they fight.

>chinks think they still have a chance after the election of God President Trump

HAHAHAHAHA your shilling won't save you when your economy implodes under our new trade deals

>>32243729
Not to mention how, due to their rations, armored vehicle interiors don't match the changing body sizes of the crews that supposed to operate them. Talk about sardine-packed charlie chicoms eh?

File: Shut up and send me more pigs to kill.png (66KB, 745x487px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 745x487px

>filename

File: 1423707261381.gif (3MB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 300x168px

>>32241809
supremely underrated post

>>32241809
>~600 million chinks doing anal gape porn

Somehow, I get the feeling the whole world would be bored of anal gape porn after a short amount of time.

>>32243918
people still carry 1911s

>another ebin chink thread

File: 1376954831535.jpg (2KB, 125x89px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 125x89px

>>32241809

>>32243887
I don't get it. How are 20m people dying from a strike on silos? Are they based in the middle of shanghai?

>>32243581
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LC97wdQOmfI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBMU6l6GsdM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2bpAm11w7E

The US has little to fear from ICBMs. That last one is because we can do CGI as well. neat. There is your nuclear retaliation meme out the window. While china is trying to create decoy systems with hyper maneuverable mirvs, the US is changing the game with lasers and particle weapons.

Hey, at least you will always have the cultural victory option. China will just get conquered by a group of people with the last name Chang, because apparently chinese cant stand living in china.

>>32241547
>I read parts of that thread and all I saw was Americans losing ground against facts that has sources.
>Americans losing ground against facts that has sources.
>facts that has sources
O K C H A R L I E

>Implying a single shot will need to be fired to expel the US Navy from the western pacific

You can either remove yourselves within 48 hours or risk being fired upon. What do you think the American people are gonna tolerate, hmm?

>>32241602

Poking holes in the deck won't sink shit

China would be better off focusing on subs

>>32245479
Blast effects and fallout.

>>32246570
>mach 5 kinetic warhead plunging through your munitions, avgas storage
ok tough guy, I'm sure it's no problem

>>32241580
>They only have the KE of a Harpoon missile

did you fail highschool kinematics? You dumb fuck.

>>32246163
This. ABC here, enjoy your mass graves. Should've picked children & prosperity over polluted communist hell. Maybe dogs will taste good in hell.

File: 4edad2dda8049e95f4a63aea77cab07d.jpg (8KB, 150x200px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 150x200px

>>32243448
>mfw when F35 drops a stealth bouncing bomb on the dam, just to make it remind us all of the good old days

>>32247026

>mfw mass murder will still be illegal if WW3 happens
>mfw those people responsible will be cucked for decades as punishment after ring leaders get hanged

Extremism isn't worth it.

>>32245234
What is this, a meme for ants?

File: 1481088069007.jpg (123KB, 750x537px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 750x537px

>>32247048
>strategic bombing is mass murder
Cry all you want, kraut.
it won't make it true

>>32247048
Nukes flying
B-But you no blow dam, evil monster!
We only sank carrier as a test of weapon!

File: 1472311646909.png (55KB, 850x1905px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 850x1905px

>>32241439

Open wide. Here comes the airplane!

>>32246533
>threatening America

Oh boy you really don't understand the American people do you?

>>32247048
this only applies to fags who lose wars
oh... I see what you are implying.

>>32246163
>particle weapons
Wait, seriously?

>>32243524
Hurdurr blowing up the dam won't blow up the dam!!

File: 160103729.jpg (63KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 320x240px

>>32246533

Who the fuck do you think you're threatening asshole.

>>32247311
We made functional tank turret sized plasma cannons in the 60s bro.

It's just that the capacitors were too damn big.

All of our railgun research will probably end with wave-motion guns soon

>>32247420
>wave-motion guns

Only plasma weapon I know of is the fucking MARAUDER
And I've heard neither hide nor hair of Wave-Motion weaponry.

Come on anon, let's keep it to shit we're actually flinging angry fuck yous out of, like Railguns.

>>32247522
Wave motion shit was a meme, it's from animoo, Space Battleship Yamato I think.

Really I was just trying to say we have some ridiculous shit that we made but haven't fielded.

Also the tank guns were the point of MARAUDER.

>>32247572

MARAUDER got hushed up because it was so successful, there hasn't been hide nor hair of it's advancements in 20+ Years.

>>32247594
We haven't needed it yet.


I for one and super exited to curb-stomp the red chinese with power armor, railguns, particle accelerator cannons, and plasma vortex guns.

>>32246533

>t. Tojo

>>32247645
>we haven't needed it yet

not that you know of, anyway

let's just say the great race of yith got a taste of their own fucking medicine.

>>32247594
>hide nor hair
Methinks doth wail too muchly, good sir. Thine english be verily archaic.

>>32241594
>One American can kill 30 chinks

ain't what happened in Korea and Vietnam.

File: 1430256591116.gif (3MB, 300x237px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 300x237px

>>32247910

It wasn't that damn archaic.

>>32247939
Oh yeah, I'm sorry, we only killed 16 gooks for every one American in Vietnam.

>>32246533
>You can either remove yourselves within 48 hours or risk being fired upon
And how will you do that Zhang? Meowing at us and asking us to prease reave?

>>32243524
hello xi

>>32241602

Carriers are specifically armored from the top to deflect these sort of attacks (and prevent crash-landings from bringing down the entire vessel), and have been since WW2.

File: 1480608111162.jpg (18KB, 249x285px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 249x285px

>>32241439
Oh boy, the daily China shill thread.

>>32244476
Fuck you

File: 1458344249692.gif (3KB, 50x42px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 50x42px

>>32247104
4u

>>32248623
Want me to call the waaaaambulance, saltboi?

>>32241439
Just remember.

America went to war against TWO nations, unrelated to the original attackers because of the lost of 3.000 lives and two buildings.

what do you think we would do with the lost of 5000 lives and a multi billion dollar carrier?

>>32246533
DO IT FGT DO IT PLS DO IT DO IT FAGGOT GOD IM GETTING HARD DO IT.

t. Marine who wants to remove china from man made clay in the scs

Ps: DO IT. DONT LET YOUR DREAMS STAY DREAMS.

>>32247594
Toroids are great for straight line shots. In a noncurvy magnetic field environment with no atmosphere. Maurader worked because it had a building and was shooting space.

I fucking hope we got to war with the chinks, I want the opportunity to kill pinkos in my lifetime.

>>32248914
Start with the incoming Pakistani take over team. Chinks are yellow squints. Caucasian Commies are pinkos.

File: brannigan.jpg (88KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 400x400px

>>32247939
>implying ceaseless waves of Chinamen wasn't what overwhelmed UN positions in Korea

File: 1480376962122.png (108KB, 700x673px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 700x673px

>>32249213
>UN

>>32249213
>UN
I seem to vaguely recall Americans and South Koreans doing all the work...

>>32249237
>>32249257
The war was fought under the auspices of the UN, but yes, US and ROK constituted 99% of the UN combatants

>>32243524
We lose a few major cities that vote liberal anyway. Nothing of value was lost.

>>32246822
Considering that each warhead only makes a hole 12X42 feet, you would need to get at least 3 sequential hits in the exact same spot to even begin to think about getting enough penetration to reach fuel and magazines. Good luck with that, Hop Sing.

Your second problem is, being able to specifically target fuel storage and magazines.

Finally, the USN stopped using avgas when they stopped using piston engines in aircraft- late 40s/early 50s or thereabouts. The current jet fuel is JP-5, which is basically light Diesel fuel.

You'd need to hit a carrier at least a dozen times to have a hope of doing anything significant. Since the chances of hitting a moving carrier come out to just over 0.003%, you'd need to launch between 1200 and 1500 missiles to be assured of a hard kill. That many missiles cost about as much as a carrier. Good luck with that.

>>32243432
Hundreds of submarine, ship and air launched cruise missiles, submarine launched ballistic nuclear weapons, etc. Etc.

>>32246940
>the Australian Strategic Policy Institute has calculated that the energy of an inert 500 kg (1,100 lb) RV impacting at Mach 6 had similar energy to the combined kinetic and explosive power of the American subsonic Harpoon anti-ship missile, which is one-quarter the energy of the Russian supersonic 12,800 lb (5,800 kg) Kh-22 missile traveling at Mach 4 with a 2,200 lb (1,000 kg) warhead.[33]

>>32246822
How many W88s are on a Trident missile? 14? Its about 375kt with <80m CEP right?

What are the top 14 cities in China?

>>32249739
>GBU-57A three gorges, Siluodu, Wudongde, and Baihetan dams
>hit power stations for Qinshan, Ling Ao, Yangjiang, and Ningde Nuclear Power Plants
>bottom any container ships in Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hong Kong, Ningbo-Zhoushan, Quingdao, and Guanzhou
>blockade Dalian, Xiamen, Lianyungang
>repeat as necessary
>wait sixteen months until they sue for peace

>>32249739

today only the bongs use the full bus of 14 native made warheads

USN is limited to 8 W88s by START

>>32249801
GBU57? Nah. W88 the national command personnel, regional communist leadership, and let the provinces determine continuity of government. See two Chinas today become many more.

>>32241476
Link?

>>32249304

>fund 90% of NATO and the UN
>receive 1% help in return

Hopefully Trump will realize as a business model, this is unsustainable.

File: 07_10.jpg (80KB, 619x357px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 619x357px

>fukka u america we brow up ros angeres

No, please, anything but that

File: IdiAmin_is_amused.gif (2MB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 200x150px

>>32251167

>>32241602
>)))

THIS POSTER IS A RUSSIAN SHILL

THEY USE ))) INSTEAD OF :) BECAUSE THEIR KEYBOARDS DON'T HAVE COLONS.

YOU THOUGHT I WOULDN'T NOTICE, VLAD!

>>32249801
You can kiss all US pacific assets from Kadana to Guam goodbye. Maybe toss in a few carrier groups.

>>32249941
Actually you're going to see a marked increase in nationalism. And I hope the chinese drop a fee DF31A mirvs your way while you're having dinner eith your inbred family.

File: your deposit.jpg (167KB, 500x374px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 500x374px

>>32251654
>g-unit fantasies

>>32251819
More grounded in reality than that shit he (you) posted.

>>32249570
I'm not saying you're wrong but where do you get the 0.003% number? Carriers are big as fuck and they don't seem particularly fast, how can it be such a low chance to hit?

>>32251928
With what? Your one non-functional carrier? Magic ballistic anti-air/ship missiles?

>>32251954
>Over 30 knots
>Turns like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4KnCqcTEOU

>>32251955
Are you fucking retarded?

Rhetorical question of course.

Keep on cruising the moron highway. I'm off to bed.

>>32251967
Sure, I understand that, but a .003% chance seems exaggerated. If there are anti aircraft missiles capable of taking down jets and helicopters which are much faster, much smaller, and way more maneuverable, why is a carrier hit chance so low?

>>32251985
>I ran out of arguments, time to shitpost and get another 3.44 Yuan!

>>32247240

American soldiers that murder, rape, etc still get punished.

So would anyone that blows up the 3 gorges dam.

Clogging it with jello is a better idea.

>>32249699
kinetic energy is expressed in weapons alot different to chemical, so this is a retarded comparison

>>32251999
How exactly are you targeting and tracking it to even get it close enough for terminal guidance in the first place? Spy sats can't follow targets and it's trivial to know where they will cover and evade on the open ocean.

How are you getting it through the Aegis screen?

How are you getting through the Combat Air Patrol umbrella?

A non-stealth aircraft is trivial to spot in the air, but ships can use the horizon to evade sea/ground-based radar.

>>32251954
Working with the listed CEP of the DF-21 as a start. It only has a 20% chance of hitting a stationary target the size of a carrier.

Then you factor for the distance the carrier would travel between the time the launch is detected and impact. It's roughly 15 minutes flight time, the launch will be detected immediately and the carrier will get a Flash warning immediately. CSG changes course, lights off all counter measures, and increases speed. Any enemy observation platforms either eat a missile or get jammed into oblivion. This kills final targeting solutions that the ballistic missiles need to come within a nautical mile of the target.

>>32252282
So you arrived at that number by pure fantasy. Cool, why don't you just stfu now?

>>32252082
>How are you getting it through the Aegis screen?
AEGIS has never been successfully tested against hypersonic ASBM. It is paper tiger.

>>32252478
>It is paper tiger.
So, just like China?

>>32251954
Think about it in terms of relativity, yes a carrier is fucking big, but compared to the thing it floats on top of, it doesn't even register, add to that the fact its moving constantly, not just forwards backwards left or right, but also pitching and rolling on the waves, now imagine trying to hit that in a critical place several times, from a very long distance.
Not to mention its got its own defences, as well as a bunch of other ships near it that are there to protect it with even more defences....
I'm not saying a CBG is un-dead able, but they gone close.

>>32252669
battleships are more undeadable and they were deaded
its just a matter of fighting your way through an airwing to dead a carrier

lots of carriers were deaded in ww2

>>32252478
>DF21a mach 10
>SM3 Mach 10.2, block IIa Mach 15
>SM2 ERAM can target ballistic missiles
>SM6 hits ballistic missiles in terminal phase just before impact

How fucked would China be after their missile gets intercepted?
Do you think radar operators would just start running away from their posts when they see HARMS on screen?
Pilots refusing to fly in fear of certain death?
It would be an almost immediate route knowing their ace in the hole has failed

>>32252711
lol this post

>>32252760
>untested army hopes to make a quick strike against America and shock them into capitulation
Sound familiar to you or do you not know history well?

>>32243641
>America finally matches Sino Russian internet propaganda capacity
Main stream media already calls China a superpower, Stan.
No point in pretending they're weak now.

>>32246812
...W40 has a 10 kiloton yield. that's tactical nuclear level. how would it tangentially kill 20 million?

>>32252847
Literally no media source does.

>>32251167
I keked

>The American President is a Russian Puppet
>American proxy state loses Crimea
>America loses Philippines
>American operatives die in Syria

File: 1475875460999.jpg (721KB, 1000x731px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1000x731px

>>32241809

>>32241602
No Abrams has ever been destroyed - they only get disabled, you vatnik.

>>32252935
>Russian economy is literally bankrupt
>they can somehow afford to bribe a billionaire
KEK this is what happens when you purge all of your international advisors

>>32241832
Anon, that is one of the announced conditions considered a nuke retaliation enabler. Fun times with Vault Tech next.

Somehow I suppose Russia will invade China to cause when China is fully focused on America and ASEAN.

Oh China.

China China China.

We will enjoy mining and farming your soon to be depopulated wasteland. Could you please put a little flag or something where rare earth metals would be? There will be none of you left to help me prospect for them, and I'd rather not start over completely once your society is wiped from history.

>>32241439
USA lose 1 aircraft carrier due to hit by newest cutting edge technology anti ship missle, China gets nuked to oblivion by 40yo nukes and noone bats an eye.
So it is like:
>1 carrier vs 80mln dead chinks.
Way to go China, way to go.

File: 1293778691880.jpg (9KB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 320x240px

>>32252686
>WW2
>How things happened then relevant now

>>32252419
I gave you the condensed version, fuckwit. The probability I came up with is a result of the distance the carrier moves between launch and impact (between 6 and 7 nm, assuming an average speed of 30 kts), and the listed CEP of the DF-21. Do the math, Corky.

Keep in mind, that hit probability ONLY takes into account the movement of the target and the accuracy of the missile.

>>32247939

Democrats won't be calling the shots this time around.

>>32254843
>Democrats won't be calling the shots this time around.
>Two Total Invasions followed by aimless "Nation-building"
>Republican operation

>>32254848

Make up your mind. Are you Chang or Ahmed?

>>32252686
>the only thing protecting a carrier is planes!!1

Anyway, the vast majority of carriers lost in WW2 were either sunk by other ships or crippled/trapped and then scuttled by either their own side or the enemy after they were captured.

>>32254850
Neither, I'm just pointing out that which party's in charge guarantees nothing.

While we'really on the topic of carrier killing, can someone give me a straight answer on whether Tu-160 has an anti-shipping capability in Kh-15S?

>>32252858
>W40
What does that have to do with anything?

Those arent the warheads we are talking about

>>32253131
>Implying China would be able to launch nukes at anyone.

>>32252858
>W40

That weapon hasn't been in service since 1972.

>>32252478
>AEGIS successfully targeted and intercepted a falling satellite traveling at Mach 21

>>32255137
Dead satellites can't supermaneuver, unlike Wu-14.

>>32256288
>Magic wunderwaffles

>>32256288
It still sets a precedent that the system has some pretty impressive capabilities

>>32246163
LMAO, what if they put seven warheads on a rocket? Yanks btfo.

File: image.jpg (16KB, 300x290px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x290px

>>32241439
Open wide Chinks
Here comes the missiles

File: ssgn tube.png (471KB, 642x482px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 642x482px

>>32257798
>ywn see an SSGN blow its entire load of tomahawks on chink launch sites

>>32249739
This >>32249934
The rest of the RVs are basically dummy warheads with maybe some HE in them, don't know if the US employs purpose built ECM pen-aids on MIRVs.

>>32241752
Fucking this

>>32243432
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vZyL-zEoMfM

>>32253093
Blackmail, remember we have one sex tape in Russia that was introduced and yanked out of there faster than the world yoyo champion sticking it in.

>>32257865
>tfw my blood runs cold when I imagine what kind of shenanigans end up with having someone paint "No Step" in bold letters on a missile fairing

I thought submarine crews were supposed to be smart

>>32258958
The main requirement for submariners is to be suicidal.

File: you dropped this, chang.jpg (633KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

633KB, 1440x2560px

>>32252847
>points refuted: 0
Huh

>>32243524
china has literally 1/10 of the nukes US has, and if Trump actually manages to ally US to Russia, China and the rest of the world will shut up, because then we'd have 90% of the nuclear arsenal in the entire world

https://youtu.be/7-K8Q6FnW0Y

kek

>>32253131
No one would escalate to nuclear strikes over conventional strikes on the homeland, only the US and Russia have that policy.

>>32258958
I've met some who made a game out of putting their dicks in the pockets of people sleeping on the boat. They're not

>>32254801
The missile can home in on it retard. the tech is already been available for like 30 years. or is american technology so bad

>>32259896
Taiwan #1

>>32259732
Sounds kinda fun desu

File: 1429309773962.gif (2MB, 300x290px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x290px

>>32259896
>poster is discussing capabilities of DF-21, a Chinese MRBM
>"is american technology so bad"

>>32259896
How can the re-entry vehicle see through its own plasma sheath in order to actively track the target? Checkmate, Chang.

>>32259896
Do you really have that much confidence in the Chicom Kill-Chain? We're talking about a nation with absolutely no experience in any military affair, besides pirates off of the horn of africa.

>>32259896
No it can't, retard. Ballistic missiles can hit stationary targets all day long. They can not hit moving targets. That technology might be getting close, but it's not quite there yet.

It's like trying to hit a hummingbird with a bullet, from 100 yards away. Only, you have to guess where the hummingbird will be in 12 minutes and aim at that spot.

>>32256288
>supermaneuver
You mean flail about uncontrollably during reentry?

>>32246533
This has been historically shown to be fallacious thinking at best

>>32260461
That's not true, they also have experience running away and leaving UN workers to get raped.

File: 1329423415810.jpg (301KB, 558x600px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 558x600px

>>32241809

>>32262921
Leading to the japanese taking over their failed peacekeeping ops. Wouldn't be the first time japan took up the slack.

>On its way into San Diego Naval Base, the Zumwalt passed the Chinese frigates Yancheng and Daqing and the oiler Tai Hu, which were docked at the Embarcadero for a port call.

Topkek running your new ship over data gathering experts. I bet the ship already lost its edge because it has been studied closely, now it is but an easy target.

>>32266324
>data gathering experts

HAHAHAHAHAHA.

>>32259896
You do know that the Chinese got that tech from espionage in the US, right?

Implying Chinese engineers can build anything right is a meme

>>32254952
Bump for answer. Do Russian AF Tu-160s have access to Kh-15S?

>>32266537
You're a dumb shit

>>32266876
>China fag detected

File: 2ec[1].png (572KB, 600x580px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 600x580px

DF-21D
F
-
2
1
D

AMERICA IS FINISHED

File: R2FMPr9[1].jpg (113KB, 1440x1438px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1440x1438px

>>32261085
>No it can't, retard. Ballistic missiles can hit stationary targets all day long. They can not hit moving targets. That technology might be getting close, but it's not quite there yet.
>hurr durr I think every ballistic missile is a one-piece like a SCUD
>hurr durr what a warhead?
>hurr durr you means theys can DETACH massa? [shuckin' and jivin' intensifies]
>he doesn't know about the supermaneuver Wu-14

Why American crave death so much?

WU
U

>>32267536
>>32267562
3.44 Yuan have been deposited in your account.

File: 1481304681364.png (991KB, 900x1000px) Image search: [Google]

991KB, 900x1000px

>>32241439
That's a 9/11 joke you dumbass.

c'mon

>>32241809
Nobody is gonna be left after we bathe them in nuclear hellfire you mong.

>>32267562
Detach all the warheads you want, they're still going to miss. Even if you use nukes, which is counter to China's no-first-use policy and would leave you wide open to nuclear retaliation by a better armed opponent.

Or do you crave death that badly?

WU-14 is a meme until it actually gets fielded. In the meantime, we'll just shoot it down with the lasers we haven't deployed yet. Hypersonic can't dodge lightspeed, Hop Sing.

Come back when you have a real, working, proven weapons system.

File: now this is shitposting.jpg (61KB, 500x329px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 500x329px

>>32241439
Can Hiroshimoot ban every IP from mainland China?

>>32267707
china already develope new system that is protect missiles amerifat. It has laser blocking materials consistent with new material science being developed in new divisions. You just are scared of our new weapons and this is funny and make me happy you cry tears of burgers.

>>32244476
kek

>>32252858
>W40
Except at the bottom it clearly says W88.

>>32259896

You need mid-flight corrections and terminal guidance, which he already explained to you - go back to middle school.

>>32267736
He did it to Russia during a DDoS.

>>32267857
easy stupid american. The missile is datalinked to other systems that do tracking for it. Go bad to shitty amerifat educational institute.

>>32247939
We only have educated guesses for how many chinks we killed in Vietnam and Korea. There were just so many of the tiny little bastards lying around we couldn't be bothered to do a real tally.

File: 1397978679819.gif (858KB, 240x228px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 240x228px

>>32258958
You don't want to know what happens in the dead of night on a submarine

>>32267752
>We plan to develop anti-laser technology that somehow stops really hot things from exploding. You're fat.

>>32267970
>The missile is datalinked to other systems that do tracking for it. Go bad to shitty amerifat educational institute.

"Magic Chinese tracking systems!1"

>>32267752
Any fantasy weapon you can dream up, we can fantasize a counter to it. We're a lot more creative than you.

Have fun sticking mirror tiles all over your missiles. All we have to do is use a rail gun to toss some pocket sand at your missiles, and then it's game over.

You're at least a quarter century away from being able to defend against pocket sand.

>>32268142
The proper term is Chink Space Magic.

>>32267707
>we'll just shoot it down with the lasers we haven't deployed yet.
LITERALLY f a n t a s y

go read dilbert or something fucking faggot

>>32267970
Laughable. We outnumber your AEW assets with just the ones we fly off our carriers. Your ground-based systems fly from known airbases in an attempt to track down an airfield that goes where it pleases. Not in a million years are you going to get that shit close enough for long enough to guide in a DF-21D; BARCAP and SAM traps will turn you to ash with 250nmi between you and your prize.

>>32268175
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1
>A high-energy laser was used to intercept a test target in January 2010,[3] and the following month, successfully destroyed two test missiles.

File: 3 gorges dam.jpg (5KB, 299x169px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 299x169px

>>32241439
daily reminder: every year there is a 5% chance that the 3 gorges dam will sweep all of developed china into the sea
>nice dam you got there chang, pity if something were to happen to it.jpg

>>32268260
Kek will be shaking the dragon soon.

File: Ianpepe.png (89KB, 632x492px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 632x492px

>>32251167

File: china will grow larger.jpg (118KB, 593x611px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 593x611px

>>32268175
>LITERALLY f a n t a s y
>says the chink while masturbating over muh hypersonic wunderwaffe

>>32268252
YAL-1 was 100% a testbed. The people in charge of the program said themselves that despite all research foals being met, the system was operationally useless.

>>32241439
Are those... artillery shells?
>Op pls stop, you're killing my brain cells

File: HEL_Roadmap.png (242KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1366x768px

>>32268175
Don't worry, it's coming.

>>32267970
>it's now overly complicated on top of being built like shit

Chinese magick

>>32269773
>overly complicated.
Fuck off, everything uses datalinks now. That's not the problem with DF-21D. The problem is that the PLAF and PLAN have less than 200 fixed wing patrol aircraft between them. So few that they still use 70's vintage J-8s to try to fill the gaps. As I said before, the USN has more E-2s in service than the PLAN has fixed wing patrol planes, point fucking blank.

>>32268175
Well, the WU-14 is literally a fantasy until it deploys. So we can stop it with the Dragonriders of Pern if we want to.

If you want to just limit the discussion to actual weapons that are deployed, your options become considerably narrower. China currently doesn't have a ballistic antiship missile that can hit a moving carrier.

Go ahead and post some more ass rage.

>>32268045
it takes minutes to shoot down a shitty drone, now try to shoot down something with it thats meant to withstand heat. get btfo

>>32268160
except its not fantasy and you're delusional. Actually a lot of systems incorporate such or similar types of tech. Especially American ones. Its defiantly not out of the realms of realism.

>>32257865
I'd totally step on them tho

>>32241809
/d/ plz go.

>>32241439
Guys, be nice to OP. He's only shilling shitty, outdated propaganda to earn more rice rations. It's not his fault. He's trying really hard guys!

>>32268160
>let's make a shitty missile more complicated and likely to break

Chink logic everyone

>>32270378
sorry, that was meant for >>32267970

>>32257865
Makes me want to step

>>32270378
Forget that, you missed the part where they think they can actually tail a carrier with an airborne or ocean going sensor for the missile's entire flight time. As though three or four squadrons of strike fighters, an EW squadron, a AEWC squadron, two chopper squadrons, and multiple long range SAM complexes would have nothing to say about it.

>>32270482
Isn't that the cover for the radar array? Aren't those very thin?

Pretty sure stepping would trash a $1.5 million missile.

File: hqdefault.jpg (12KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 480x360px

>>32268160

>>32268604
Needs more smog and undrinkable polluted water

>>32269773
cry harder bitch nigga. Its not really that more complicated for what it can offer. You act like this is space magic. Its more complicated but isn't outside possibility. You're just mad China will rekt your shitty country. We will soon rule the waves and your bitch ass allies. America time is up. China will rise to the supreme power of the earth and reign down fire from the heavens with its adorable and beautiful weapons. stay mad amerishit

>>32270917
You are right, i was being stupid arguing with you. I didn't see it that way. Its really not that complicated and china does have a adequate military and industry to back it up. I dont know why we mess with china in its own back yard. The south china sea is always been china. I just wish we would not.

>>32270917
Can't hear you over the wind whistling through the holes in your killchain. You desperately need more proper fixed wing sensor aircraft. And you need tactical fighters that aren't based on land almost as badly. Your island chains are a crutch, and the USN will pick them apart at leisure if you fail to challenge them out at sea. Your Russian-derived carriers are a decent start, but they are utterly outclassed by their prospective enemies. If you want your new Great Wall to stand strong against everything we can bring at you, you need enough eyes in the sky to maintain patrols, and you need a carrier air wing that can threaten a CBG enough to give your sensors a real chance at living long enough to drop the hammer. You're never gonna be able to kill a decked out USN force when we know where all your shit lives.

>>32270213
>Actually a lot of systems incorporate such or similar types of tech.

Name them. I'll wait. Operational systems only.

>>32270399
S'okay. I like the idea of mirror tiles all over Chink missiles. NATO code name: Disco Ball

>>32270917
Are you using translation software? What you wrote is hilarious.

>>32271227
dumb american knows nothing. We could have sank your carrier lol but we were being nice and decided not too. Our supercarrier is already master of the china sea and we have many more incoming. America aircraft carrier dont even work now because no german scientists to teach them how to build it. After they all die your carrier no more work.

File: 1322531398654[1].jpg (42KB, 600x1066px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 600x1066px

>>32268160
>hurr durr let me tell you about weapons we don't have that don't work

>>32271519
>Supercarrier
>Two squadrons of strike fighters
>One squadron of assorted choppers

You're making me laugh, my slant-eyed friend. Our carriers fly three or four squadrons of fighters, two squadrons of choppers, an electronic warfare squadron, a proper fixed-wing early warning squadron, and a resupply detatchment. Simultaneously.

Also, fucking what? We were building and operating carriers when German scientists still mostly worked for their own country. We were building and operating carriers while you fuckers were getting the shit raped out of you by Japan, so badly that our 1st Army Volunteer Group, the one you memorialize in Zhijiang, Kunming, Nanjing, and Guiling to this day, saved your hides with a force of just 90 practically obsolete P-40s.

>>32260409
American here. The only way to guide a warhead would to use a satellite and to guide it in.

>>32271739
america lost vietnam and we destory you to dust in korea. don't make us superior infantry tactics over you again. if you had no germans, new type carrier would not be existed. china did not get much help to defeat nips. we destroyed them after hard fought war. we also had civil war at same time so it extra hard for us and we still beat them. america just get lucky at battle for midway and other battle. america also cheat using nuclear atomic weapons because amerishit very scared of japan quality army. america need russia help to destroy japan and only reason japan surrender was because russia. Now russia is our bitch. we control them and they like our NATO with phillipines. we have more nukes than you and are better so get ready for china rise to the supreme of heaven.

>>32271739
b-but Boeing's first successful aircraft was designed by Chinaman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wong_Tsu

Apollo moon lander computer core memory invented by Chinaman.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic-core_memory

>>32272100
You can't boast about Korea. Our Korean allies are an advanced, prosperous nation. Yours have devolved so far that even your government grows tired of their insanity. When the North inevitably folds, it will be democracy that grows larger, not the dregs of Chinese Communism.

Vietnam was a learning experience, I'll admit, but we pulled out due to weak politicians who refused to finish the job even though we had broken the NVA's back. Had our leaders not decided to abandon our allies, the south would not have fallen.

>If you had no Germans
Wishful thinking. We do, deal with it.

We destroyed Imperial Japan, not you, and not Russia. We had ravaged every Japanese island with our bombers for months before we gave them the first warnings that we were going to 'cheat' them out of their cities one by one. Sun Tzu would kick your ass for even suggesting that it's possible to cheat at war, by the way. And we were not about to let our sons die fighting Japanese civilian suicide squads in an invasion of the home islands. And we saw what they did to you and the rest of Asia, and we didn't give a shit if they burned. They deserved it, and nobody should know that better than you.

Russia could snuff you more easily than we can, by the way. What with the huge land border and all.

>>32272158
>When the Kuomintang government was defeated in the civil war, Wong went to Taiwan where he became professor of aviation at Cheng Kung University.

Oops?

>>32257865
>SSGN blow its entire load of tomahawks on chink launch sites
Do Americans really believe in this?

America has not even TRIED to try launching all of it's missiles in one go.

Atleast Russia has done it.

>>32272457
what the fuck does this even mean

>>32272457
No, not all of us. That one probably played too many video games. But shooting 154 missiles all at once is not what attacking DF-21D launch sites would look like. With respect to the Chinese military, of we can launch at that many Df-21 launch sites at one time, it could only be because Chinase forces fucked up extraordinarily badly.

>>32272375
look mother fucker... i'm just trying to troll some faggots here and you come in with well thought out responses by using facts and not even getting emotional. Could you fuck off please so I can bait some other retards? I'm not even having fun anymore.

>>32272778
No. Find some other hole to piss in.

>>32246533
Going to war then... boy that would be fun.... realpolitic says Russia and India would get involved too. I would expect Russian land forces to take Harbin pretty quick. They probably have route programmed into their Glonass receivers already. Don't expect anything like that to be just one country on another. A unilateral declaration that suddenly a large part of the planet belongs to someone else would get kickback just to keep the precedent from happening.

Op original post... bait we really don't think that weapon will actually work that well. It would be a killing blow attack.

>>32248806
Get back on your leash MUHREEN.
Army calls dibs

>>32272934
>we really don't think that weapon will actually work that well
t. 300lb American-educated keyboard expert

>>32273029
Error 404: Argument Not Found

>>32272375
WE WUZ GENERALZ N SHIET

fuck off

>>32273065
Argument: original faggot makes claim to authority by referencing... himself, who has no fucking clue.

File: tumblr_mcct52YDZl1qhn3smo1_1280.gif (116KB, 850x1076px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 850x1076px

>>32273095
No u. The last true superpower doesn't need your approval.

Pretty sure every other country in South East Asia would want to jump in maybe with the exception of Mongolia, China's not exactly well liked by their neighbors.

>>32271640
Which are the only appropriate counter to Chink vaporware. Our imaginary defenses against their make-believe superweapons. It balances out perfectly.

>>32271519
>posting in heavily accented, broken English.

Keep going, please. I'm screencapping the highlights, for when I need a few paragraphs of medium-rare pasta.