Just bought pic related, roast me /k/.

>>32147466
Why bother, you've already fucked yourself.

What's wrong with these magpul drum mags? Too many feeding issues or some bullshity reason why they suck in /k/'s eyes?

>>32147505
Why buy plastic

>>32147466
I have one, it works. Hasn't fucked up yet.
clue us in on everyother thing you buy OP

/thread

I mean I guess its the best option for an ar drum mag but it just doesn't seem worth it. They cost a lot and thats not to say they're overpriced just that it has lower value than something like an AK chinese drum mag. Sure its a different product but if you have both and AR and AK like you should its funner and cheaper to blat away with 75 rounds of 7.62 Soviet.

>>32147533
>125$
>" a lot"

>>32147466
It's kind of annoying to load and unload, if you need to.
Seems to work though, I wouldn't put it on a DMR or anything but it's GOAT on an AR pistol.

Anyone that doesn;t think this is a reasonable purchase is a retard. There's nothing to roast, you bought one of the better high cap AR mags out there.

>>32147466

MAGPUL
PMAG
40

Why Not That Instead?
They said its their best magazine yet.
Even better than the standard PMAG-30.
Solid as a fucking goat.

> Though this reminds me of the Quad Fucking Stack magpul 60 rounder that they have a patent for.

> Does ANYBODY know why they didnt release their Quad Stack 60 rounder? Were they having problems with it feeding that they couldnt seem to solve?

> Its just such a fucking game changer that I dont know why Magpul isnt all over that shit, these guys are geniuses

> Plus the PDR, what gives...

>>32147563

That's twelve P-mags.

I'd rather have those.

>>32147533
Not everyone is so poor they only make gun purchases on a broke slav's budget

File: magpulx200op.png (16KB, 200x312px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 200x312px

>>32147749
knew id find it on google somewhere

seeing as its magpul I doubt that it would have the same kinda problems that the Surefire trash has

>>32147466
i have two ak drums, who cares? get whatever you want, just don't pay too much for it.

File: IMG_20161118_180252.jpg (398KB, 1441x1070px) Image search: [Google]

398KB, 1441x1070px

>>32147466

Well shit, I like mine. Yeah it was expensive but it has been 100% reliable so far and even locks the bolt back. Something my fuckin surefire quad stack mag doesn't do.

Bought a korean dual drum for $100,put 300 rounds and no malfunctions yet

File: inline_mfcf768O1r1r2kw8v.gif (483KB, 141x141px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 141x141px

>>32147953
Nice AR there, boss

File: 14803819122401452218857.jpg (3MB, 3006x5344px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3006x5344px

>>32147749
They are fun
> Banana clipz

>>32147513
Light? Aesthetics? 60rds is pretty good for the size.

>>32147729
I want to plug the Armatac SAW drum, it's like the Beta C double drum except not shit and reliably feeds a full load of 150rds

It is very expensive though (like $300~), and it's not lightweight.

>>32147466
Where did you get it and for how much?

Cool now do dis

File: 1479238804643.jpg (18KB, 480x319px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 480x319px

>>32149701
>pic

>>32149718
Does this mag feed 300 black?
Give me a geissele 7 inch rail with an 9 inch 300 barrel and this setup
I'd be happy

>>32147505
They're fine, but very expensive and only 60 rounds
you could buy 9 pmags for the price of one D60

>>32147505
putting all the wear on the left feed ramp

>>32149718
>can't shotgun the upper without removing the grip
Just fuck my AR up.

>>32147505
Because a 40 round pmag is $20 max

So you paid $150 to be able to have 10 extra rounds which you'd probably miss anyway

Plus you paid almost eight times the cost to have a heavier magazine, that you can only carry one of, that barely holds any more ammo than a 40 rounder (which is why, you know, reloading magazines was invented), and will break much faster than a regular magazine

you're either lying, don't actually own a gun, or are retarded.