AKS-74U is cute, cute!

File: micro2.jpg (69KB, 800x613px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 800x613px

>>32146280

File: tumblr_m3xup25AAx1r9khx4o1_500.jpg (142KB, 500x335px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 500x335px

>>32146280
I heard it the weapon was designed for the special forces but they never liked it, is this weapon as good as the AKS 74 or its only advangade of the weapon that it is compact?

>>32146337
shit i can't grammar sry i should've chekd it

>>32146286
Between this and an NPAP, which should I get?

>>32146337
It was designed for everyone who didn't need to carry around a full sized AK.

>>32146286
the shape of the wood part ruin it's cuteness and makes it ugly

>>32146357
most people has problems with the Draco lik not cycling properly so i would say get a WASR

>>32146280
Who makes decent AKS-74U copies today?
Also can you get a real holster?

>>32146337
It was designed for vehicle crews

>>32146280

Can I get one here in America?

File: CAM00965.jpg (923KB, 1944x2592px) Image search: [Google]

923KB, 1944x2592px

>>32146357
>>32146393
I wouldn't mess with a micro. I'd say the mini would be good for a toy, but if reliability is the first concern go draco or PAP. Both are on par with WASR for reliability.

PAP is heavier (thicker receiver), with no chrome lining (somewhat shorter barrel life) it also has a hinged dust cover which allows for the dust cover mounted rear sight (longer sight radius).

I believe based on measuring for my SBR, that the draco has a slightly longer barrel. It also is able to accept standard AKM handguards, as well as many other parts, while the PAP is a proprietary design, and not 100% true to the AKM pattern rifles. The draco has a 90 degree gas block, which is also chrome lined.

Both the Draco and M92 are genuine military arms (minus stock and auto), built in the same factories that arm those nations. Both will serve you well, yet the minor differences are with considering.

>>32146528
Regular current production NPAPs DO NOT have a thicker receiver. Only the older OPAPs do, along with the M70 kit builds in circulation. If it does not have bulges below the charging handle, it is not the RPK receiver.

>>32146455
lol is this the entire weapon? looks just a m4a1 with parts missing

>>32146912

I think it's one of the early colt 9mm ARs.

>>32146528
I have a C39v2 and enjoy it.
I was thinking about picking up an M70 for my second ak but the draco looks really neat.
How long does it take to get the tax stamp to SBR it?

File: folded.jpg (2MB, 3680x2752px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3680x2752px

>>32146280
I have one of those

File: open.jpg (2MB, 4000x2336px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4000x2336px

>>32146437
>Who makes decent AKS-74U copies today?
Nobody, you will pay a pile for the parts kit then a pay a pile to have it built
>Also can you get a real holster?
I assume you mean the aircrew plastic holsters. If so, no. I talked to about 40 gunstores/milsurp sales people in russia and they all say they are hens teeth

>>32147237
well shit then maybe someday

File: Itty bitty baby AK.jpg (65KB, 1161x480px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 1161x480px

>>32146280
>protip:you can't
But I can...

>>32147279
looks like a scorpionized ak, how the actual fuck it cycle?

>>32147289
7.62x25mm blowback.

>>32147315
oh i assumed it works with 7,62x39

>>32147279

Awe I want one

>>32147279
What kind of round does it fire? .380?

>>32147138
Nice to see someone else with a C39V2 that doesn't shit on it. Don't shoot mine much but ilove it.

>>32147493
probably 7.62x25 Tokarev

>>32147279
this weapon seriously need to be painted again
>that insulating tape on the mag

File: MP5A2.jpg (53KB, 899x599px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 899x599px

>>32146280
You were saying......?

Lil' Misery was also pretty fuckin dope. Didn't save the jpg though.

>>32147237
>no PBS
>intothetrash.jpg

>>32147279
>The first AK you find in S.T.A.L.K.E.R.

File: didntread.gif (976KB, 252x198px) Image search: [Google]

976KB, 252x198px

>>32147600
>>no PBS
Fake can while I wait for SBR stamp

File: type56c.jpg (21KB, 600x209px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 600x209px

>>32146280
>not even posting the cutest AK

>>32147806
I love the Chinese style side folders

>>32146280
Maybe not. But I'm sure I can prove you're a faggot.

I fucking love these small AK's with wire underfolder stock

It's just so perfect for urban operating

File: R retracted door open.jpg (103KB, 1382x574px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1382x574px

>>32146280

File: AK pistol deal with it.png (1MB, 1182x600px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1182x600px

>>32146280
>>32146286
>>32146455
>>32147173
>>32147279
>>32147806
>>32149072
You call that small?

>N-PAP Owner here
>CON: No Bayonet Lug
>CON: No rear sling point
>Unlined barrel is accurate, but thick
>PRO: Side-rail for optics is already present
>> You don't want a top rail anon, top rails are shit.
>CON: Furniture seems difficult to find

Despite its inconveniences, I enjoy my PAP. If you want a bayonet lug (Can also be used to mount a bi-pod), you can change the gas-block, or slap some weld on it and do some fitting/grinding.

>>32149391
Oh, also: If you're getting a PAP make sure it's gen 3 or newer. First get had some shit-tier fuckery going on that made it only take single stacks and was allegedly like trying to make PB&J without Jiff.

>>32146653
I'm pretty sure that the M92 has a different (thicker) receiver than the standard NPAP.

>>32149391
I want an O-Pap, I've heard they're better

>>32146393
Regular Dracos are fine, the mini and micro Dracos suck dick though