Can the USA remotely detonate the UK's nuclear weapons?

>>32115007

No.

Retard.

>>32115007

No, because it doesn't work like that.

>>32115007
Yes

And china can remotely blow up everything with "Made in China" written on it. That's why we should never go to war with them, all our troops will just detonate as soon as the touched Chinese ground

>>32115007
no, what retard ever thought that?

>>32115034
I'm asking for a friend

>>32115050

Tell him he's too stupid to live.

>>32115007
with enough neutrons you could

>>32115007
I mean, it's a possibility.

But how do you mean?

Like have them detonate the nuclear warheads in all their missiles, suitcase nukes, and artillery shells?

Or like plant and detonate explosives on them?

Or like use some sort of beam to activate the explosives in the warheads?

>>32115120

I think OP means via a backdoor.

>>32115007
the core controls for the warhead are still made in britain iirc.
like the controls for the lens.

might be some hidden kill switch to stop the missiles from launching but if a random anon online can think of that then i'm pretty sure some paranoid game theory expert working for the UK government probably already had the missiles ripped apart and analyzed under an electron microscope.

Yes, fuck off red coats.

>>32115120
>Like have them detonate the nuclear warheads in all their missiles, suitcase nukes, and artillery shells?

Since when did England have nuclear artillery

>>32115120
>>how to know someone is underage on /k.
>Like have
>Or like plant
>Or like use
I can already imagine you talking...
"like, ugghhhh, some thing that, ughhhh, is like cool man will blow up the bomb things."

>>32115235
I'm sorry I didn't put a lot of effort into my questions to the OP about their retarded question.

But like, chill out man. You are superseriously harshing my buzz, like totally ruining the high bro. Like, c'mon bro, do you even lift?

No because Britain can just deactivate the atoms