EDCC -- 3" 686+ [7] VS 4" 627 [8]

>>32109815

>you're a big guy

I've shot the 6" 686 quite a bit and I absolutely love it.

I can't imagine concealing that big of a revolver though, you must wear jackets.

>>32109815
8 shot is smaller than you would think but yes jacket gun as >>32109844 suggested being likely. Wouldn't use buffalo bore or hot reloads but great desk/car/house gun to leave loaded at all times for 8 shots of fuck you to intruders

File: python.jpg (469KB, 2380x1040px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 2380x1040px

>>32109815
for IWB the 686 definitely
for OWB or a horizontal or vertical shoulder rig the 627
vertical shoulder holsters are the only real practical option for barrels longer than 4"

>>32111718
Why hello 1974.

Revolvers are for faggots and jam all the time and typical revolver rounds are anemic in power. Get yourself a real CCW gun like a High Point or a Taurus. Cheap and shoot the good stuff.

>>32111887
Sure Tyrone

>>32111887
Although I am team semi auto, i've never had a revolver jam on me

>>32111863
Fun times and still applicable for office wear for the busy executive who doesn't feel the need to leave q witness statement (or evidence) after dindu defense

>>32112060
Thanks for the integrity it goes lacking in these discussions too often. I love both for different reasons and see no reason to limit options.

627 is 5" and an 8 round cylinder is pretty fuckin big. I'm about to buy one for OC/innawoods but I don't see myself comfortably concealing it.

File: 460.jpg (492KB, 2370x1064px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 2370x1064px

>>32112353
It would be wide for IWB but OWB or shoulder holsters would be fine.

Needs a jacket or something though.

>>32112375
Jacket with large exterior pockets paired with a featurless paddle holster pinned to jacket lining. Used to carry a 44 mag 4 inch this way for coyote/couger/black bear/junkie defense before I moved up north