Which is better looking?

>caring about aesthetics
>whichever one you get, make sure to get it engraved

>>32101955
low
less jump but more recoil into your hand

Low barrel will make it easier to control recoil even with shitty technique, but speaking about aesthetics the classic is better

>>32101955
Low barrel, but without all that ugly shit the rhino has up above and a proper handle made for people without hooks for hands

File: Chiappa Rhino 200DS.jpg (70KB, 1067x749px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1067x749px

short 6 o'clock barrel

File: nosorog.jpg (33KB, 763x526px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 763x526px

>>32102207

>>32102207
I wish they waren't so shitty, I really respect the design.

>>32101955
High
>I fantasize about being a cowboy in the 19th century
Low
>I fantasize about being a street cowboy in the 22rd century

Either way semi-autos are better.

>>32101998
This. The Rhino looks like its trying too hard. A solid block without holes would look way better.

>>32101955
umm...the bottom is a pallet gun

also wouldn't you want the barrel to be as close to the sights as possible?

But if I go low, they go high.

I prefer not to have my fingers get burned and not have my rounds land lower than where I'm used to.

File: DSC05962.280140628_std.jpg (46KB, 800x446px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x446px

The only 6 o'clock bore revolver which looks good is the Meatba.

Also too many guns try to ape the look of the Colt Python with a full barrel lug, I think it's boring (most don't copy the rib anyway).

>>32101955
I want a Rhino soooo fucking bad.

Also, that's a pellet gun

>>32102229
Yes.

And, in 30 years no one will know what a Rhino is except for us /k/ommandos, who I assume will still be here sperging out, but S&W and Colt will still be building revolvers that look almost identical to the ones they build now.

No need to evolve if it doesn't solve any problems.

>>32102225
>22rd

>>32102225
>22rd

>>32102225
Bill, this is the 22rd time you've said this!

>>32102225
>Twenty-turd