Post your own chart

>>32059994
>M1917 not in patrician

More US troops weilded these over a 1903.

>>32060224
Yeah, but wasn't the 1903 better?

>>32059994
add m39 in patrician

>>32060239
No.

Also, you used the wrong 1895. Christ on sale, get your shit together. Also, the 5rnd Berthier long rifles weren't used in WW1. They came after. It's the 5rnd carbines that were used.

>>32059994
K31 to Patrician or your chart is shit.

>>32060281
>>32060257
>K31
>M39
>WW1
Hmmmm

>>32060239
ehh sorta, they're both really strong actions, 1917 is a bit heavier but has a nicer rear sight than the earlier 1903s which didn't have a rear aperature on the bridge, and it also depends on if you prefer cock on closing, which is faster if you do it with gross motor skills but it annoys a lot of people because you have to overcome that spring tension to close the bolt.

also the gewehr 88 is frankly plebeian, it was just as hastily cobbled together as the Lebel but it was just *okay*, while the Mauser is considered to be one of the, if not the best rifles ever made

>>32060289
Didn't read filename, so that's my bad; thought it was just a chart of milsurp boltgun rankings in general.

Which then leads me to wonder about the quality and popular opinion of the Schmidt-Rubin compared to others in it's time.

>>32060289
Didn't see that. Whoops.

>>32060322
The 1911 infantry rifle is bretty sweet.
Standard sights, strong action, and extremely accurate free floated barrel.

Gp11 ammo is arguably the best standard issue ammo ever used.

>>32060224
This. OP is a faggot.