INFANTRY

>>32055053
>Implying Strykers aren't just rolling coffins against a near-peer.

>>32055053
Well they are marines

>>32055149
Well they did simulate a Stryker brigade taking out an enemy armored brigade..only with heavy casualties.

>>32055053
bcuz Russia is like 95% open fields.

File: 1340520086409.jpg (71KB, 539x465px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 539x465px

>>32055053
>Why do I always see videos of infantry training in open fields? Why the fuck would modern infantry engage in open fields?

Well, laddo.

1. Because training in heavy vegetation sucks fucking ass. That's why.

2. We still do. And it sucks fucking ass. And taking a video of your PSG screaming profanities after mother nature thwacks him across the face for the umpteenth time on the STX lane is only funny in the context of the moment, not as an Army recruitment video.

>>32055053
1. Gotta cross open fields to get to the innawoods in most places
2. They're propaganda/recruitment videos, filming in the open allows John Q. Public to see all the "cool shit" you wouldn't be able to if it were filmed innawoods with trees n' shit in the way.

>>32055053
>Why do I always see videos of infantry training in open fields?

Because if they were training in enclosed fields you wouldn't be able to see them, would you?

>US marines

thats all you gotta know

>>32055053
Fuckin POG

because that's where the photographer has the easiest time taking pictures.

isn't it bedtime yet?

File: 1454710623698.jpg (145KB, 670x424px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 670x424px

>>32056979
No. Need a bedtime story. Please read the one about headspace and timing.

Because officers literally become aroused by complicated conops