so /k/
what is the superior carbine?
AR-15 or AN-94?
>>32048564
not a fair comparison. the AR in it's modern flat top incarnations is a rifle meant to be heavily accessorized. the AN-94 and AKs with side rails are not can't be. It's always an afterthought and mostly in the way. AK types are meant to be used with irons. the best "uprgrade for an AK would be better sights (ghost ring etc.) and better triggers.
>>32048590
what is AK-12
>>32048596
still an afterthough. no where near as slick as an AR.
>>32048600
implying early AR-15 was HSLD as today AR-15
>>32048607
>implying early AR-15 was HSLD as today AR-15
can you read?
>the AR in it's modern flat top incarnations
>>32048630
>the AR in it's modern flat top incarnations is
please explain why AK in it's modern incarnations is just a afterthough
>>32048638
>please explain why AK in it's modern incarnations is just a afterthough
what AKs are you talking about? changing the furniture from wood to plastic doesn't really make the gun modern in my book. The AK has not gone through a development like changing the carry handle sight to flat top rails. and when you have an optic on the saide rail, god forbid you have to cler a malf like a BCG override. you ahve to take off the optic, the the dust cover, clear the malf and then reassemble the gun.
>>32048652
>what AKs are you talking about?
Ak-12 of course
and hinged dust cover can hold zero, and the side rail as well
>>32048564
The AR platform is superior to the AK platform and the AN-94.
I'm surprised people don't know this.
>Putting pulleys in a gun
Gimmick wears off when you have to fix the thing.
>>32048732
>shits where it eats jam-o-matic
Yeah nah
>>32049368
>derpposting this hard
>>32049368
>>32049368