How many guns is too many?

>>32047469
>guns
>too many
well I guess if they're all nuggets, glocks, or hi-points then the answer would be 1 however for pic in OP you're going to want at least 10 of those with no maximum

>>32047469
>Too many guns.
what?

>>32047469
when you aren't able to afford ammo for all of your guns

Precisely all of them plus one

When they fill the entire volume of your house, vehicle and sheds and other lockable structures.

Gotta be able to secure the guns when you have to leave to buy more guns.

When there are literally none left to buy

One more than all of them

X+1
Where X = All of them

More than 3

You only need a pistol, semi-automatic (or select fire) rifle, and a shotgun

Proof me wrong

>>32048033
How am I gonna build a fence if I'm only allowed three nuggets?

>>32047469

I don't understand the question.

>>32048033
Technically you would probably want a bolt action rifle in a larger caliber or hunting purposes beyond 4 or 500 yards.

>>32047469
When it's starts to impact your relationships and life negatively.

Basically the same as alcohol or gambling.

Before I get flamed I don't mean a legal limit to drive just that if you're spending rent money on ammo/guns you should reconsider you actions.

>>32048396
top wholesome post friend

>>32047469
When you start to buy guns in retarded calibers that you need to go to specific stores or cost more than its worth to practice shoot with.

>>32047469

>coworker: why do you have so many guns?
>to protect my other guns

File: AQONV7y.jpg (1001KB, 3283x4925px) Image search: [Google]

1001KB, 3283x4925px

What a wild collection of guns.

The 90s were a wild time. You'd never see that combo today even if they remade the episode.

>>32048396
so basically, dont be a poorfag and youre all set.

>>32047469
>In the hands of citizens: Never too many
>In the hands of The State: One.

When you can no longer ensure that they will be maintained to a level in which they will be preserved for generations to come.

>>32048038
Underrated post

>>32047469
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

When it interferes with your ability to move

File: g-wld-100921-weapons-3a.jpg (397KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 800x450px

>>32047469
around the point of nations attempting to fight you like you're an army i'd say

>>32048902
Surprisingly no. Just because you make $120k/year doesn't mean you aren't living paycheck to paycheck. People like to keep up with joness which gets more expensive the higher up you are. It's certainly easier to not struggle when you make more money but people still do. They just drive teslas instead of corollas and eat at expensive steakhouses every night instead of McDonald's.

>>32048033
>Need
SHALL

>>32047469

when you have trouble keeping all the necessary ammo in stock. That's why it's good to use the same ammo across most of your guns.

>>32048995
the key is to grow up poor and continue to be a poor fuck while learning how to accumulate wealth

if you're rich the moment you go below your childhood standard of wealth (which is yearly vacations, nice cars, pretty friends, beach holidays and the occasional business class flight for an overseas holiday) you're going to lose your shit, if you're poor you can eat ramen for the rest of your life and be happy

t. rich poorfag

p.s teslas are shit and elon musk is a fucking hack

>>32048995
its not struggling if youre living beyond your means at well above the average wage, youre just a spoiled idiot.

in my mind, a man only needs 2-3 guns of each caliber he wants to own

for example 9mm
>buy shitty 9mm glock for beating up
>buy 9mm HK or Colt cuz you ball hard
>buy a beretta 9mm cuz it's cheap and reliable for the price

of course you may want to collect different types of guns too. Having lots of guns of the same caliber is a good thing.

>>32048981
decent collection

when you need a bigger safe because your current safe is already filled to the brim, so buy another safe

>>32049019
Tesla was just the first to thing that came to mind. I am not not a fan.

>>32049022
I would agree but I met a lot of people when I worked in finance that were struggling while make an absurd amount of money. And I do mean struggling with money taking payday loans and fighting with their spouses. A lot of that can be solved like you said but it doesn't change their experience.

Rich people are pretty big babies though so it can be hard getting them to give up 4 of their 7 leased cars.

>>32047469
>How many guns is too many?
If you personally possess more firearms than the government, then you may have too many.

>>32049052
i unironically drive a neon pink toyota corolla from 2000, i might have a look at that new model 3 once it comes out but unless that's good i'm not buying a new car until i roll this one into an orphanage

File: 1455893340353.jpg (40KB, 400x402px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 400x402px

>>32049051

>not building a shed filled with safes

>>32047469
all of them + 1

>>32047469
When you can't maintain them.

>>32047637
>>32047680
>>32047918
>>32049083
It sounds like you faggots are saying there are or soon will be too many guns.

>>32049150
I think their reasoning is you wouldn't be able to shoot all of them

>>32049150
no, "all of them" is a constantly increasing number

Dudes, OP asked how many guns are too many, not how many guns you should own.

"All of them" is too many guns. Because if you have all the guns, that means no one else has any guns, which sounds like tyranny to me.

File: 1475524151842.png (515KB, 680x639px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 680x639px

>>32047607
>tfw 1 gun is too many

>>32049292
Top kek

>>32049165
An increasing number that is forever "too many"

>>32049163
OP didn't specify to shoot, to own or to shove up your butt so people are just outright saying that the number of guns that exists is too many.

>>32049433
>An increasing number that is forever "too many"

2/10 I replied

>>32049057
This. If you personally have an arsenal greater than the governing body it is a safe assumption you are the tyrant guns are for overthrowing. Or at the bare minimum a piece of shit billionaire.

>>32049433
No, they're saying you take the TOTAL number and add one. Meaning, whatever the total number of guns is, it will never reach the mark of "too many".
Why am I replying to this

>>32049070
Good man. Imo there's no reason to get get a new car every couple years. I'm perfectly fine driving my 08 accord and not having a $3-$400 monthly payment. That's a lot more guns and ammo and booze.