inferior to every german tank it saw action against

Even the Panzer I and II?

>>31981433
35 38?

>>31981386
*You

>>31981455
Even the 35 and 38?

OP is a Naziboo who keeps getting BTFO in War Thunder and needs to get good.

>>31981386
It wrecked Pz. IIIs and IVs.

One could argue that Pz. Is and Pz. II were inferior to Polish tanks when they invaded, and that Pz. IIIs and IVs were inferior to the 1937 design of the T-34/76 when they invaded Russia.

File: m4a2e8.jpg (113KB, 800x515px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 800x515px

>>31981386
Same deal.

>>31981386
...yet it shit all over them like a constipated Chinamen full of prunes does the slats on the communal shithouse floor

>>31985152
>things that never happened

Over 80% of shittyfour production was destroyed

>>31981386
Yet, the krauts lost.

>>31981666
>hurr sherman reliable
>don't pay attention to unbombed detroit that part doesn't matter

Well, not entirely. The T-34 could and did kick the hell out of every Panzer model the Germans fielded. But even the Soviet crews themselves admitted that, outside of combat, German tanks were superior in every way. They were ergonomic, well made, and mechanically reliable, rarely ever breaking down on long road marches. They were all equipped with radios, whereas a platoon of T-34s might only have one in the commander's tank. And needless to say, heavy tanks ate T-34s for breakfast.

When it comes to WW2 tanks, generally speaking, the T-34 is overrated, the Sherman is underrated, and barely anybody actually knows anything about German tanks but thinks that they were invincible superweapons anyway.

>>31985530
100% of Nazis lost the war

>>31985579
You say that like conducive no meaningful attacks on your enemy's ability to make war is somehow not your fault.

>>31981666
They had me up until the Sherman tank. Every tank fielded throughout the war burned up when penetrated unless they used wet ammo stowage.

I think it's fair to say that the Sherman was probably the best overall tank to see action in World War II, and it's kinda fucked that its reputation has been trashed by movies and History Channel horseshit.

>>31985649

Yeah, they had other problems to worry about with the Sherman.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXB_tBgq6Rc

>>31985696
what, being penetrated from the side?

>>31985724

You could clearly see the front turret was opened up, hence why the TC is missing a head.

But hey, the Sherman have strategic mobility. Someone should actually go to the battlefield graves of the crew of any Sherman, and preach about the merits of the Sherman's great modularity and road mobility.

File: he's tryin.jpg (81KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 500x281px

>>31985758

File: horse to panther evolution.gif (4MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 480x270px

>>31985758

I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if Shermanboos would do that. Their attitude of their shit not stinking is right up their with Wehriboo and Slaviboo delusions.

And to add, at least the Krauts and the Slavs had the excuse of war being pounded into their countries to rush out low quality armor. What was America's? U-boats on the coast, the Gooks sending fire balloons?

>>31985872
don't reply to yourself, it's unseemly

File: t-34 armor seam.jpg (233KB, 999x749px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 999x749px

can't even keep its own armor on

File: XTGHVkv.jpg (144KB, 800x486px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 800x486px

>>31985828

>AYO HOL UP

>*pulls headless carcass out of turret*

>THIS MOFUGGAH HAD A FINAL DRIVE WHICH COULD BE REPLACED IN 20 MINUTES

>*smacks intestines of driver, which spill out of his mangled corpse as he is dragged out of Sherman*

>YOU SEE THIS ENGINE NIGGUH? APPROPRIATED FROM AMERICAN AVIATION TO SPEED UP PRODUCTION

>*tosses severed arms and legs from inside Sherman*

>>31985883

This might come as a shock to someone as fucking delusional as you are, but I did not reply to myself. But hey, whatever makes yu feel better

SHERMAN GOOD! SHERMAN STRONG, SHERMAN INFALLIBLE! USA USA USA

>>31985913
>things that don't happen
simply saying the sherman wasn't shit is being a fanboy

maybe you should get a doctor to check out that butthurt you're experiencing

>>31985902
you seem pretty upset that someone made a thread about how shit the t-34 was

>>31985965

I was agreeing with you about the exaggeration of Sherman fires, but the moment I mention a real problem, you freak the fuck out.

>>31985998
What are you even talking about?