How come civilians haven't done drone strikes?

>>31937117
Because explosives

>>31937122
>guns don't exist

they dumb dumbs

Consumer drones are tiny as fuck and weigh a fraction of a feather.

They can't really hold guns and bombs and shit. The simplest solution would be attach a gun, but the recoil would probably fuck them up hardcore.

>>31937236
Planes are bulkier.

>>31937324
But thanks to larger wingspan they can take more of a payload. Fucking retard.

>>31937364
That's my point, it was just badly worded.

>>31937117
It's just a matter of time.

My prediction that it'll be an explosive payload delivered with an entry level, but big enough FPV drone. More probably a fixed wing than a quad - they have better fuel efficiency, lower detection rate, and better range. You won't even know who pulled the trigger.

>>31938400
On nightline the other night they embedded with Iraqi special forces. In one scene they send a camera quad up for recon. It took less than minute and an RC plane made from C4 and duct tape was comming their way. They shot it down but mentioned you never launch a drone till your ready to move fast.
This is old hat tactics this day and age.

>>31937117
because you're not a civilian if you do a drone strike

>>31937117
tf2 faggot shoot urself in the nuts

>>31937117
check youtube, OP.
The average civilian drone is flimsy but I've seen the larger ones equipped with roman candles, a glock, a chainsaw, a flamethrower, etc.