[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Why do people hate on 7.62x39 so much while praising the .45

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 64
Thread images: 4

File: cartridge.jpg (77KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]
cartridge.jpg
77KB, 1024x768px
Why do people hate on 7.62x39 so much while praising the .45 acp for its "stopping power"?
I've been thinking about doing a 7.62 build but everyone i know is saying its a piece of shit round to invest in.
i know ones a pistol caliber and another is a rifle, but arent they in a similar situation right now?
>both are fairly heavy hitting for the guns they're chambered in
>phased out by lighter more efficient cartridges (for most parts)
>both have greater penetration power compared to their competitors but harder to control and weigh more
is 7.62 just that much worse because it's in the rifle realm or is it just a bloated muh americanism behind the .45 acp?
im relatively new to firearms so im sorry if i sound retarded.
>>
I think it's a Russian hate thing. I've loved my SKS to death since I've bought it.
>>
I dunno. I look love the 7.6x39 cartridge. Maybe the hate comes from hating something that isn't American? The 7.62x39 does a lot of things well enough. Intermediate cartridges rock.
>>
If anyone was looking, Dick's had boxes of 100 rounds for $30 yesterday. Don't know if they are still that cheap. Funny story, I bought one and a box of 50 9mm, the upstanding african american that checked me out (who was NOT high, you can be assured of that) scanned in the 9mm first, then while the "check ID" error message popped up, scanned the 7.62, but of course it didn't scan, since the register was waiting for age verification. My total was $13.
>>
The 7.62x39 is hated because you might as well just shoot 5.56. Much better ballistics.
>>
It's an outdated poorfag round made for drunk russians or inbred hajis.

The free world uses .223, and for good reason.

Now fuck off, Vladimir.
>>
>>31919329
This. It's a round designed for disposable soldiers anon
>>
>>31918970
>is 7.62 just that much worse because it's in the rifle realm
This, big and slow is (mostly) a pistol thing because all pistol rounds have crummy human killing performance. Rifles don't have the case/barrel size limitations that pistols do and can thus do both big enough and fast enough at once.
>>
>>31919358
I prefer big calibers

If you need more stoppin powah, just make it go faster
>>
>>31918970
>762 build
Like an AR? That's why people shit on it. 762x39 ARs are notorious for being shitty, unreliable, prone to breaking, and also ugly as fuck. It's not the best round but it still kills shit and within 300 yards it's accurate enough
>>
JUST
UST
ST
T

BUY
UY
Y

AN
A

AR
A
!!
>>
>>31918970
>Why do people hate on 7.62x39 so much
It's pretty much just salty AR fags and Mini Thirty owners. CZ 527 and AK owners enjoy the round.
>>
>>31919504
read: Slavaboos enjoy the round.
>>
>>31919539
Slavaboos enjoy a cheap slav round that can be used for plinking, defense, and medium game, stop the fucking presses.
>>
>>31918970
Probably because it doesn't feed well in muh aye arr fifteen. Look at .300 meme out. Everyone jerk ing off about it left and right, yet failing to see that in terms of performance it's essentially 7.62x39 redesigned to fit in STANAGs and cycle well out of ar15s
>>
>>31919307
What is penetration? What is better terminal dallistics with shorter barrels? What is the ability to cycle subsonic?
>>
>>31919613
A meme. Velocity and accuracy is wjere its at boris
>>
>>31919474
>Fucking up this badly
>>
>>31919663
Not when you're fighting at under 300 yards
>>
>>31919663
>he doesn't want a sneaky breeki suppressed krink build
look at this faggot
>>
>>31919726
not when 7.62x39 can't reliably hit anything outside of 125. inb4 youtube videos with "muh SKS can hit out to 600!

Yea, nah.
>>
>>31919753
>use low quality ammo
>get bad results

Color me shocked
>>
>>31919782
no shit. 7.62x39 is low quality by design and manufacture.

that's kinda the point of this thread.
>>
>>31918970
Cuz et aint uh thuddy-awt six, whut fer stoppin fellers in thuh tracks
>>
>>31919854
I'm talking surplus. You absolutely can hit consistently beyonder 150 meters with 7.62x39
>>
ITT: slavaboo virgins
>>
File: baitzkrieg.jpg (26KB, 540x315px) Image search: [Google]
baitzkrieg.jpg
26KB, 540x315px
>>31919854
>>
>>31919880
Do you want to provide some ballistics tables, nog?
>>
>>31919896
>>
>>31919925
Oh shit, 7.62x39 is worse than .300 blackout

My sides are gone. My point is made.
>>
>>31919948
If by worse you mean nearly identical
>>
>>31919959
When you have to claim your caliber to be "nearly identical to .300 blackout you've already lost, my friend. Goodnight.
>>
>>31919977
Your argument is itself a non argument.
>>
>>31919948
>>31919977
>that guy who thinks it's smart to attempt 500yd shots with an AR of any type
>>
>>31919387
Something you can easily do in a rifle. Pistols, especially semi-autos, are limited in how much you can do that because the cartridge can only be so large and the barrel can only be so long.
>>
>>31920035
>that guy who thinks it's smart to attempt 500yd shots with an AR of any type
Even if you've got a 2.5 moa rifle at best you can nail steel out 500 yards just fine. The marines regularly shoot out to 500 yards. Are you just retarded?
>>
>>31920173
So can AKs my friend. Try doing that in combat and also ask yourself how useful that is when you're fighting in urban warfare and you wish your area could penetrator the cover they were hiding behid
>>
>>31920173
"can sometimes do it in the prone on a range" vs "literally any other conditions"
>>
>>31920226
>>31920226
The autism literally never ends.
>>
>>31920226
>They only make Ak's in 7.62x39
>They only make Ar's in 5.56x45
Okay fag lord
>>31920258
>that guy who thinks it's smart to attempt 500yd shots with an AR of any type
I wasn't aware you were specifying the conditions retard. Maybe you should just blow your brains on the wall for being this retarded?
>>
>>31920340

This is a classic situation where you should listen to your own advice.
>>
It's not a great round. I love it, but it's lacking. You won't be able to shoot at more than 400 meters if that's a factor. Over all though, it's a fun round with tons of energy behind it. Just don't overlook the fact that it's a glorified pistol cartridge.
>>
>>31920340
Psst, you can still hit targets past 300 yards with a 7.62 ak. Well maybe not you personally, but it is definitely doable
>>
>>31919594
This is exactly why I like the meme cartridge.

Let's do an ak round in an AR.

Lost the case taper, which is good, and you get subsonic if you like cans.

I like cans.
>>
>>31920396
I think it's great too. I just understand that it's not magic. It's just 7.62x39 that feeds in an ar15
>>
>>31920384
No it's not. 300 is good but at 301 it all goes to shit. That's why you want 5.45x39 because that one's like a laser
>>
>>31920410
I'm not the magic guy.

They call me

Can-anon
>>
>>31920410
It preforms worse then x39
300 blackout: 125 gr (8 g) OTM 2,215 ft/s (675 m/s) 1,360 ft·lbf
x39: 8.0 g (123 gr) FMJ 2,421 ft/s) (1,607 ft·lbf)

an analogy would be: 7.62x39 is to .30-30, as 300 blk is to 7.62x39. Beyond its ability to switch to subsonics and expand (but not fragment, or maybe it does I never looked it up) more then .223. Other then that it is a "meme" round.
>>
File: withavz.jpg (2MB, 2688x1520px) Image search: [Google]
withavz.jpg
2MB, 2688x1520px
>>31918970
only /arg/ fags hate on 7.62x39. It does what it was designed to do well; kill shit at 300 meters. If you want a tack driver at 600+ meters, you pick up a 5.56/5.45.
>>
>>31919098
>Maybe the hate comes from hating something that isn't American?

That would explain a lot.
>>
>>31919474
>Just buy an AA

Nobody needs an anti-air gun, anon.
>>
>>31920846
Just read the 2nd Amendment.
>>
>>31920846

SHALL
>>
>>31920887
NOT
>>
>>31920928
BE
>>
>>31920947
INFRINGED.
>>
>>31920878
>>31920887
>>31920947
>>31920964

If not all samefagged, fucking based.
>>
>>31918970
Too many complete pass-through with minimal damage. This is why the ak-74 uses the 5.45 round... Yaw
>>
IN for the thread that killed 7.62x39. I've been waiting on this for a while.

7.62x39 utterly BTFO.
>>
>>31918970
7.62x39 carries more than three times the muzzle energy of a 45 acp. People bitch about 7.62x39 vs 5.56x45. 7.62 is slower but has larger bullets which are 2-3x the weight of a 223 as well as an additional 200ish ft/lbs of muzzle energy.

223/556 are tiny light but very fast bullets. Fast bullets can do more tissue damage and penetrate armor better.

They are both just intermediate rifle cartridges with each their own special advantages and disadvantages.

Then comes 300blk. better than both, superior energy from short 8-10" barrels, capable of great suppression. Bullet weights ranging from 70 some grains up to 245 grains . In terms of energy, it is roughly equal to 7.62 but is capable of firing a broad range of bullet weights and very little loss of energy when going from a 16" rifle barrel down to a 10". I get 1,300 ft/lbs of muzzle energy from my 147gr fmj reloads out of a 10" barrel. A 556 from the same length barrel is pitiful. A low 750 ft/lbs of muzzle energy.
>>
>>31918970
7.62x39 is god tier for civilians
>>
>>31919896
http://youtu.be/aSuAPjw2Jgw
How about a reality check Fatnik
>>
>>31920928
>>31920947
>>31920964
>>31920976
Hmm all about a minute apart...
>>
>>31918970
Theres no point in a 7.62x39 ar, but the round itself is fine. You really gotta know your zero if youre shooting past 400 yards though
Thread posts: 64
Thread images: 4


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.