so there I was, standing in the machine shop. I went full aspie and decided to manually turn the chamfers on my work piece manually... literally, as in turning the chuck by hand and cutting the chamfers, when I thought, "what's to stop us from making a fucking RIDICULOUS anti material-esque caliber like .468 or something and custom rifles to fit it for the purpose of mixing anti-material with prescision? imagine a three quarter inch hole in the target you fired a nearly 500 thousandths wide projectile at. an Ideas? information of
The fact it will take you yourself, years to do.
How much resources do you have to throw at it?
>>31894599
There is objectively nothing wrong with cutting a chamfer by hand.
(Old pic is old, but my machinists handbook is at work.)
>>31894599
The Soviets made the PTRS, a semi auto rifle chambered in 14.5x144, so like .570 freedoms.
>>31895138
yeah, but we want tiny groups AND limb destroying capcacity... also great exterrior ballistics.
>>31894991
here's a pic of my machinist books, I only just got into it recently. my grandfather gave this to me. and yeah, by the surface finish, you're not kidding.
Always with the been-done hypotheticals when it comes to new cartridges
greetings fellow aspie
>>31896573
greetings, now lets stare intently at our work pieces while we hand turn the lathe chuck instead of using the motor like normies. >>31895833
has .469 been done? huh. what about a .760? we could call it .760 FYS
>>31896828
my shitty chinese lathe at home doesn't have much torque, so I threaded my sks barrel by engaging the halfnut and turning the chuck with a wrench over the jaws.
>>31896887
I was on a proper leblond lathe, I just went FULL asperger's