First gun, what do yens think? Carcano thread

Hi Mr. Oswald.

>>31871545
>Sporterizing a Carcano
Disgusting.

>>31871545
This kills the Kennedy

>not sporterizing milsurp rifles

You know why so many of those old rifles were sporterized? Because they'd be useless without sporterization.

>>31871735
didnt do it myself, was only 160 so i figured why not

ive shot one of these, was shit quality.

would rather have a mosin.

>>31871545
1: better hope that was originally a carbine, because if it wasn't no matter how good of a shot you are it won't shoot sub 10 moa groups because they used a progressive rifling which means that the pitch of the rifling gets faster along the length of the bore and shortening it destroys accuracy.
2: I hope that scope is not your only method of sighting because damn they did a bad job of it

File: The Waffen SS questions your post.jpg (531KB, 1600x1177px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 1600x1177px

>>31871772

>>31871545
>.22 rifle scope
>on a centerfire

>>31871772
>Unironically believing this
OK chief.

>>31871772
No, guys just wanted cheap milsurp rifles to look like the more expensive sporting rifles.

Functionality was added if a scope was mounted, but I usually don't hunt with glass unless I know I'll be shooting past 150 yards.

>>31871828

Good deal. That sporter stock (looks like a Bishop) is worth at least $100-125 IIRC

>>31871873
i noticed when i shot it long distances you can barely hit shit, thought it was the scope. unfortunate cause i wanted to hunt with it, should i buy a new barrel?

>>31871928
they wanted them to be lighter, which is why they chopped the front end of the stock

>>31871887
yeah that scope has to go its really shitty, any recommendations for a better one?

>>31871735
>>31871923
>>31871928
All this autism. There is nothing wrong with sporterizing a milsurp rifle.

File: ozzy.jpg (107KB, 736x552px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 736x552px

>>31871545
>>31871715
>>31871736

>>31872015
There was a reason someone sold it, get a new barrel if a new scope doesn't solve the issue.

File: image.png (606KB, 1450x660px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1450x660px

I can't wait to buy that M41 and K98k from my grandpappy...

>>31873359
>theres nothing wrong with throwing away the entire value of an object and destroying its history at the same time

>>31873359
Adding a scope to a inexpensive milsurp is okay, but full sportering is retarded in this day and age.

>>31873981
>Mass produced rifles that have sat in storage for 3/4's of their existence have value and history

>>31871736
figured i may as well buy the model that killed my second favorite president

>>31873981
A gun is just a gun

Sporterizing makes these guns useful, otherwise they are too heavy and inaccurate

>>31872015
Scope look like those cheap pieces of shit you get for bb guns

>>31874016
They literally do you mong. Practically no sporterized milsurp are worth more than $150

>>31874514
>im a shit shot and too weak to hold a 7 pound rifle

There is no situation where sporterizing milsurp isnt retarded in the current year.