Is .38spl a good enough defensive round??

>>31854509
Yes

>>31854509
Yes.

>>31854509
Yes.

>>31854509
Yes!

Yes.

meme

>>31854509
Yes.

>>31854509
No, someone post the story of the guy who got hit by a ricochet off a armadillo because he used .38

>>31854600
>Defending yourself against an armadillo
An armadillo makes a pour human analogue. Your argument is invalid

>>31854509
Yes

Humans still not have developed any kind of exoskeleton.

If you can hit what you need to, it's fine.

>>31854509
No. It's too slow. Everyone can outrun it.

IT'S A GODDAMN BULLET! WTF DO YOU THINK?

>>31854648
I dunno mang I jerked off with shampoo and didn't wash it off for 3 consecutive days. It made my dick form a hard, thick crust and I had to peel it off, on occasion ripping the skin. It was a very painfull experience but on the cool side I could shape my dick into a octagon and it would hold the shape, similar to the way frozen or crusty clothes, do.

only if you like carrying a THICC revolver. you must be a fudd

>muh reliability

>>31854600
>armadillo
>firing .38spl on armadillo
>bullet bounces back
>wounded shooter
> an armadillo

So the guy shot probably either a LRN or a shitty FMJ round on an armored srface at less than 4 meters and got wounded.

WHAT A SURPRISE.
RULE N4 : Know your target (and its bouncing factor/what's behind it)