What does /k/ think of this gun?

>>31854345
Better than nothing, generally reliable enough to be useful, in a caliber that is at least useful.

You could have done a lot worse.

A friend of mine carries a Bersa Thunder in .380 and loves it, and as much as I talked shit about his decision, it's never hiccuped on him during a range session or concealed carry qual.

I personally would advocate for a 9mm, but a 380 is at least useful.

I've only read about the Bersa Thunder 380.'s, it seems pretty similar in appearance to one, but with a double stack mag. If that's so, it should be reliable based on the ammo you use. I hear it only likes certain kinds, with heavier loads.

I'm personally interested in acquiring a bersa thunder in 380. too and would like to know more. I've honestly considered just buying a makarov or Pa-63 and swapping out the trigger since the prices are so similar where I am though.

>>31854362
All the afordable 9mm they had where full service pistols, i want something more easy to conceal, also the mag capacity should be enough to deal with a threat.

>>31854345
Where'd you find yours, OP? I heard they didn't even sell those in the US.

>>31854383
My bet is that in a firefight someone armed with a Bersa Plus is better armed than someone with a Makarov due to having the double of bullets in a fully loaded magazine.

I've carried one for years. Feels great in my hand, I often forget that I'm carrying it. For the price you can't really go wrong.

>>31854398
I am in Argentina, those are sold here, Bersa is the most common brand because it is national as the cheapest.

>>31854400
I'd agree in with that comparison, I was more comparing it to the thunder. I honestly didn't know the 380. Plus existed until now, and like an above anon said, they're not available in burgerland. those two options are the closest comparisons to one another.

>>31854438
How popular is the 380 round in burgerland?