BAD-LBS-MIL

>>31837286
Sure. It may be pricy, but it seems like exactly what you want. Do you care that it may not balance out your AR the same way anymore? You should get it if you're ok with that.

File: nine.jpg (379KB, 1400x801px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1400x801px

I'd strongly advise against it unless you are Squid size.

I had an Ace Entry stock and it's preposterously tiny.

>>31837541
5'5"
I was also looking at the MFT Minimalist stocks and just keeping it short as well, but this looked neat for an extra $15

File: window blessing.jpg (732KB, 2200x1467px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 2200x1467px

>>31837559
>5'5"
I'm so sorry.

>$15
According to the internet it's about $70, which is quite expensive. A real stock gets as short, yet also allows full size humans to use it with adjustment. And is cheaper.

Now instead of strongly advising against it, I demand you reconsider.

>>31837541
what are those blue tipped bullets?

>>31837653

ice bullets

they freeze the target in place so you can shatter them with a melee attack

>>31837591
LGS has it for $60, and I can find the MFT online for about $45, but the money isn't a huge concern. Not many others would use my rifle but I suppose its still an advantage for getting a traditional stock.

>>31837559
My friend is about your size and has a Magpul CTR on his SBR, and it works well for him.

could the argument be made that this is a sling mount and not a buttstock in order to get around NFA rules for SBRs? has anybody tried?

>>31837680
Yeah, I just want something different and am sort of going for a light build. I have other ARs with magpul stuff on em, and I like the CTR and the SL K. I just wanted something different for this build I guess.

>>31837541
That's a sick sbr.