>inb4 remington immediately recalls this pistol like the R51
comes in 9 and fuddy five
how can you even fuck up a short recoil, tilting barrel handgun?
It's been done a billion times, everybody makes them.
>>31803885
Because they cut corners in almost every possible way and coast off of the reputation of their legacy products
This somehow is even uglier than a Glock or M&P
>>31804085
Wow. That's fucking nasty.
>>31804085
How come all polymer pistols look like ass? I can't think of a single good-looking one.
>>31804186
That's not true. HK's polymer guns look nice.
>>31804186
Because polymer looks cheap. No way around it.
Polymer frames with metal slides are acceptable but all polymer guns look like fucking toys.
>>31803863
Where is Zed when you need him
>>31804311
Wow. Spotted the noguns.
>>31804331
>>31804295
Confirmed
>>31804186
>>31804311
>all polymer pistols
u wot m8
>>31803863
I haven't even heard of this thing and I spend at least an hour on /k/ a day
Am I alone here?
>>31804487
>and I spend at least an hour on /k/ a day
Oh, you sweet summer child.
it looks like it's designed to go in asses, and that isn't the only shitty thing about it
It will be the first polymer handgun to rust out of the box.
Jesus fucking Christ did they literally just steal a bunch of M&P's and put PPQ slide cuts on it?
I'm legitimately shocked they didn't just rebrand some import pistol.
>>31804295
>>31804461
Only the USP looks decent. And that's because it was introduced at least a decade before every new pistol had to look like something out of a tacky B grade sci-fi action flick.
>>31804664
That's been Sig's hat trick for years.
>>31804735
that's not out of the box
that was carried
>>31803863
Kinda looks like a PPQ.
>>31804669
>Remington branded Taurus
>reputation actually improves
>>31804499
Some days its several hours other times I'm not on the chan for days or weeks. It all deoends on my schedule. I've been comming to 4 chan since 2009 and /k/ for almost 5 years now.
The question is, how does Colt feel about all this and how long before they're forced to find aimw design to rebrand like a bunch of Colt Caracals (which would be rad actually)
>>31804973
Reminder that Knight and Stoner worked on this piece of shit
>>31804186
designed by committee, this is what happens when you start drinking the corporate kool aid and liking, exact same phenomenon can be seen in other markets as well.
>>31803863
Jesus christ that looks ugly.
fucking remshit
>>31804186
I like the way the Ruger American looks.
>>31806254
>I like the way the Ruger American looks.
I don't think it looks all that bad, but it's definitely a step down from the SR series aesthetically. I guess some of the extra girth is thanks to the serialized chassis. Also, it looks a bit too...smooth. Would look much better with a grip texture similar to their new LCP.
>>31804973
Colt is too busy declaring bankruptcy and won't notice.
>>31804186
VP70 first poly, best poly.
>>31804696
False, every HK pistol looks good, Even Sigs polymer guns look good.
>>31806254
You and 2 truckers from Oklahoma have something in common now.
>>31807486
>every HK pistol looks good
You wouldn't think so if they had a Ruger logo engraved on the slide. Admit it.
>Even Sigs polymer guns look good.
Only the original SP2340 and SP2009.
>>31807520
>You wouldn't think so if they had a Ruger logo engraved on the slide. Admit it.
No, If they had ruger on the side people would bitch about them less because /k/ is filled with poor fags who hate nice things.
>Only the original SP2340 and SP2009.
The P320 and current polymer hammer guns are good looking.
Hey /k/, why the fuck can't America do modern service pistols right, anyway? So many attempts and only the M&P seems to have even come close. What gives?
>>31805179
it would have been an alright pistol if they kept the trigger in the 5lb range as designed, and not given it the 12 lb lawyer mandated one.
>>31807650
The P320 and FNX were American designs.
Holy fuck. It looks like an XDm with Down's Syndrome.
>>31805179
Are those actual rifle-sized locking lugs?
>>31804825
kek because it's true
>>31804186
>>>31804085
>How come all polymer pistols look like ass? I can't think of a single good-looking one.
Detonics STX
>>31807486
You literally have the best counterargument posted above you.
>>31807447
I don't disagree.
>>31807495
it appeals to people that actually like how the new Camaro looks.
Reviews are saying this will MSRP at $500, I would just look for a FNX at that point.
>>31803863
>>31804085
At this point in the game, unless you come up with something super new and fantastic, what's the point of throwing a turd into the pond of striker polymer pistols?
>Glock and M&P have ridiculous aftermarket from triggers and sights to holsters
>SIg has a solid lead in with and easy to clean and modify 320
>Ruger has the SR series, which the 9 and 9C are highly regarded as a great non-glock alternative
>HK's VP series at least takes mags from other HK pistols and has full custom grips
>>31809935
Don't forget
>S&W has the SD9 and SD40 series, which is striker fired at a budget
>Ruger has both ends covered, with the Ruger American and the 9E, both guns that have very good reviews and are good guns
>XDs exist. For..some reason
>>31806550
They do that every decade or so, it's no distraction anymore
>>31807627
First of all, people would bitch about them being Rugers on /k/ and "fuck bill ruger" would be within the first 10 posts
>The P320 and current polymer hammer guns are good looking.
Every design that came after the 2022 looks like shit
>>31810015
>XDs exist. For..some reason
Mostly for being "not a glock" but still dirt cheap trade ins and for bone stock .45super use. I wonder what the actual sales figures are.
>>31804825
Kek
>>31807650
if you do it right you get sued by glock for patent infngement
>>31809935
>>31810015
any nice things to say about me?
>>31813101
Well, it functions better than the caracal so there a that. Too bad steyr can't market cause it's a comfy gun
>>31804085
turd texturing
someone will stipple it