>Posy yfw "Zeppelin Raid!"

>>31778819

zeppelins didn't fly that low on bombing missions

File: Rigid ariships.jpg (12KB, 284x178px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 284x178px

>>31778819

File: .hugh.jpg (7KB, 163x240px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 163x240px

>>31778819
>tfw I load my Martini Henry with incendiary rounds

File: d.jpg (70KB, 1589x403px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1589x403px

viva da blimp

>>31778860
>missions

They only bombed London once.

How much damage could Zeppelins take in reality? Didnt it only take one good shell or Rocket to ignite the entire thing?

Which militaries used them and how many were there? Were they actually effective?

File: 7.62PZ.jpg (82KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 640x480px

>>31780735

>Didn't it only take one good shell or Rocket to ignite the entire thing?

Yes, but back then they simply didn't have the technology to make a shot like that.

Planes with machine guns and incendiary or explosive ammo became the standard defense.

There's a decent amount of explosive .30 cal rifle bullets floating around in collector's circles. As far as I know Russia is the only country who continued to produce explosive .30 cal after the second world war, everyone else gave up and pursued autocannons. I believe the US still makes explosive .50 cal for aircraft applications.

>>31778819
>Schutte-Lanz

Uhh, anon?

You do realize that you started a zeppelin threat without ACTUALLY posting a picture of a Zeppelin, right?

>>31779901
but they carried uot multiplte missions throughout the WAR