100 S-300s vs 100 F-35s

>>31762012
>Vatnick rockets
only good against civilian targets
what's your question?

>>31762034
So the s-300 would get BTFO by the F-35s?

>>31762012
dumb as fuck thread. the s-300s work in groups of SAMs.

If the goal of the F-35s is to destroy ground targets the F-35s would win.

>>31762012
With JASSM, the F-35 already effectively outranges the S-300. Well, that is unless you're a vatnik and think the maximum range isn't for anything else than ballistic threats.

In terms of detection, it's hard to guess the ranges. But the moment the S-300 turns its radar on, it's locked on by the F-35 and probably has missiles coming its way. The only way for a S-300 to effectively take down a F-35 seems to be to turn the radar on when the F-35 is flying above (good luck when you have no idea where they are), but then it's an exchange of missiles going both ways.

>>31762286
HAHAHAHAHAHA

Funny guy

>>31762012

The orginal JASSM ourtranges the detection range of the S-300 system against a VLO/LO target, the jassm er makes it worse.

Being that its a LO cruise missile too, you dont gain as much RCS with it on your wings.

>>31762359
S-300 detection ranges for normal fighters is around 300km. JASSM is 370+.

JASSM-ER (same dimensions as the standard jassm) has a 1000 km range.

The F-35 bursts into flames on the runway while the S-300s shoot down 747s. So realistically, we're the ones who win.

>>31762368

Ohohoho JASSM. :)

>>31762406
Its just a damn good missile

>>31762428

That it is. That's all I can say.

>>31762377
So, did they finish integration of that missile in F-35 or this is just another picture with future plans from LM?

Is this some kind of new daily dose?

>>31762012
>100 S-300s vs 100 F-35s
You think you're playing fucking Civilization or some shit

>>31762012
School should be 7 days a week. Maybe have a later start time, 6 hours a day, but 7 days nonetheless

>>31762012
S-300 is a system. You mean a S-300 with 100 batteries? It could probably shot down the entire NATO airforce combined.

>>31762012
The Ford F350 is too big a truck for most people. Mileage per gallon is poor and not worth is unless you need it for a work truck. Overall id suggest scaling down to a F150 or F250 for a daily driver. Ive never heard of a Vatnick.

>>31765755
He means the TELs. If you are somehow counting batteries, maybe you should count F-35 flights.

>>31762042
in the last 40 years russian air defense systems only prayed on passenger planes.
so how the fuck would we know?