Find a flaw, /k/.

Their satallite phones failed during Operation Red Wings. Also it's apparently a really grueling place to work.

>>31729353

how so? just the pace?

>>31729177
I cant own anything they make as a civilian.

Would love to have a couple javelins around. No more worries about tanks or helicopters.

>>31729177

FCS a shit

>>31729177
They went bankrupt. My company bought them, then went bankrupt and my current company bought them. So they're shit

>>31729631
Raytheon is or at least was the biggest 0day exploit vendor. You can own a 0day.

>>31729919
Wtf are you talking about?

>>31729177
The font.

>>31729177
They aren't offering me a job

They consistently underbid competitors on large contracts, and the wait until wrll into the design process before revealing 'unforseen' costs to make up the difference.

Otherwise, they produce some very useful shit. The tech behind the Elcan Spectre led to some cool DLP projectors.

>>31729373
Yeah, long hours on a fixed salary where you rarely get paid for the overtime expected of you. Other than that, typically bureaucracy shit that comes with wiring for a huge defense contractor, e.g. long wait times for components, and having your life based around yearly performance reviews.

>>31731616
>They consistently underbid competitors on large contracts, and the wait until wrll into the design process before revealing 'unforseen' costs to make up the difference.
lockheed and northrop pull the same shit all the time, pretty much s.o.p.

>>31734070
There's a solution for that: the dreaded firm fixed price

>>31731616
You are pretty much describing military tech contracting to a T.