What is your opinion on this gun?

>>31728884
just like most pistols it has its faults and its merits.
ive always wanted two so i can pretend im in a chinese action movie.

>>31728900
So it's gud then?

My buddy has one, it's not very reliable but it's built decently.

I'm willing to bet that if he gave it anything more powerful than a target load, it'd cycle fine.

Though I don't think there's any reason to buying one over a Makarov aside from pure aesthetics; especially since they weigh less and 9x18 isn't too expensive.

Not to mention the Baikals in 380.

>>31728910
Why is it not very reliable?

>>31728923
His friend only shoots weak target loads, and he speculates they're not strong enough to cycle the action properly.

>>31728884
this picture pisses me off
because of the angle those 9mm look very weird

>>31728884
I dont own an M88, but i do have a Tok and i love it to pieces. My only issue is if i ever have to reload in a hurry i may as well throw it, but thats mostly due to the fact that i havent had a chance to lighten up the mag release.

File: 20160112_205158~3.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

>>31728884
Love mine.
Hasn't had any issues.

>>31728884
Looks like a Beretta 92fs and a CZ-75 had a kid

>>31730493
No, no it doesn't.

File: 7654567898765.gif (117KB, 311x366px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 311x366px

>>31729352
Ok good...I'm not the only one with this condition.