I don't want to die /k/ What are you gonna do when it happens?

File: chill.jpg (77KB, 650x436px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 650x436px

SKS/woods

>>31717703
I moved innawoods 3 years ago. Idk where to go from here

>>31717697
Put on CRBN gear and keep doing whatever I'm ordered to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxYXjdkCPyI

Rape and pillage

If its a woman, its mine.

But seriously nukes are old shit from the 1950s. A 100 foot rock can get a higher yield if tossed through the stratossphere.

>>31717724
The.n you hunker down.

File: beautiful-gorgeous-young-woman-white-girl-600-wallpaper.jpg (67KB, 600x333px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x333px

Get under a table ofc
>nuke ground zero
>mfw im the only survivor

>>31717697
to be fair, those who die in the flash will be much happier than those who may survive in shelters or by fair luck, considering the following nuclear winter and the lethal increase in atmospheric radiation, that will inevitable, but very slowly, poison and kill everything in Earth, in the following years, then decades, centuries and millennia, what we all can agree, is much longer than the time one can spend inside a nuclear shelter.
yay! 3rd world war!

>>31717951
I hate /k/

File: 383851-26_super.png (76KB, 531x354px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 531x354px

>>31717973
<3!

Need some help fellas. It is feeling more and more like shit is going to go down. Im looking to arm myself but not really sure what I should be looking for. Was hoping for some advice on a rifle and handgun purchase.

I would like them to be hardier weapons that can go through some shit and keep firing.

Something that uses the most widely available ammo. By this I mean, in times of scarcity which rounds are still likely to be available. I have been asking around and I have been told to go with Nato rounds for the rifle and 9mm rounds for the handgun. Does that makes sense to ya'll or should i be looking at a different calibers.

Nothing super advanced as I am a novice.

I would prefer they not be super expensive but I am def willing to spend if that is what it takes to get a reliable weapon.

Something that does not jam easily.

So far I have been told to get an AR-15 for the rifle, but have not found a consensus on the handgun. I was also told to by a lower reciever and upper reciever instead of just buying the AR out right as it is much cheaper that way.

Any info/advice would be appreciated. Stay safe out there anons.

>>31717697
>I don't want to die /k/

>What are you gonna do when it happens?

Well I'll probably die when I die

>>31718011
Just have a pair of scissors OP.
>SHTF
>evil men chase you to have their way with your cute butt
>give them scissors
>run away
>they chase you
>running with scissors-they die

>>31718011
>I would like them to be hardier weapons that can go through some shit and keep firing.
AK.
>
Nothing super advanced as I am a novice.
AK.
>I would prefer they not be super expensive but I am def willing to spend if that is what it takes to get a reliable weapon.
AK.
>Something that does not jam easily.
AK.
>So far I have been told to get an AR-15 for the rifle
LOL!

and for handgun, colt 1911, I mean, is kinda the AK of guns, but honestly, thats just my shitty opinion, Im sure /K/ disagrees.
Just... don't buy anything taurus.

>>31717697
>I don't want to die /k/
>asks /k/ for advice
Seems to exist some confusion there

>>31717697
One day it'll eventually happen.
Only gonna have to do is look up to the sky and reflect the good and bad times of your life.

>>31717697
When you finish reading this sentence you will allready be dead[spoiler], not[/spoiler].

>>31718040
Ty for the (You)

File: 1474001723215.jpg (31KB, 670x503px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 670x503px

>>31717951
>considering the following nuclear winter and the lethal increase in atmospheric radiation, that will inevitable, but very slowly, poison and kill everything in Earth
No. Life will adapt and nuclear winter is probably even not going to happen. Humans will be struggling to survive, but that's been reality for the most of our species' existence.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5-xnJCFgzY

>>31718011
>rifle and handgun
i was thinking the same.
after some research i settled on a glock and winchester 92.

>>31718314
>>>31718011 (You)
>>rifle and handgun
>i was thinking the same.
>after some research i settled on a glock and winchester 92.
Cool. Glocks keep getting brought up so I am starting to lean that way. Will def check out the winchester 92. Ty for the info anon.

>>31717697
Not enough nukes to destroy the whole planet. Only enough for an area of land like Alaska.

>>31718314
>a glock
so you wanted a hand grenade instead of a handgun, cool.

>>31718649
depends on your definition of destruction.
using nuclear explosives to make a crater the size of alaska would inevitably destroy all life, or in case you are a optimistic fuck, all human life

>>31717697
Try to live as long as possible.

A friend who had to deal with this shit during the cold war and always being in a key strategic nuke target just told me "Bunkers and shit are cool, but if they launch and it lands somewhat close, you're fucked. Even if you're safe from the blast and radiation, you'll fucking go mad waiting for it to be safe to go out. The best thing you can hope that happens is if it happens whoever fired on us got it back twice as bad."

>>31717951
Pretty much this.

>>31717724
Start digging.

>>31717951
A little bit too much bullshit there but I'll give you that this time for the theatrical effect.

>not wanting to die
gtfo with this normie tier bullshit

>>31717951
I'm hoping I'm instakilled cause I'm in Seattle

>>31720062
>I'm in Seattle
Is Seattle that horrible?

>>31717703
I fucking want that helmet. What model is it?

>>31719681
Let me be more specific... anything exposed within an area the size of Alaska will receive 3rd degree burns.

>>31717703

You and every one else. Woods would be packed after a happening.

>>31717881
There's no radiation left over from a 100 foot rock.

>>31717697

The more I read up on radiation, the more I realize all these stories of viable societies set in post apocalyptic future is bullshit.

You will get sick, you will fall apart from the inside out.

You have to live underground. No argument. You have to.
What are some good food sources that you can grow underground?
Fish farm?
Mushrooms?

>>31717703

The real question is SKS or AR?

>>31717881

>rock meme
>he doesn't know about cosmic radiation
>laughinggirlsnotbeingraped.jpg

File: Meteor crater.jpg (454KB, 1024x686px) Image search: [Google]

454KB, 1024x686px

>>31722581
There;s no surviving life forms either, much more trustworthy than a lousy bomb.

The only survivors of the Mesozoic ending strike had to be on the other hemisphere.

Bolides > Nukes any day

air bursts don't leave residual radiation and dumb bombs are obsolete. The real threat is terrorists and rogue states using portable fission bombs for targeted attacks. The whole nuclear winter bullshit only happens in the MAD scenario where a thousand get dropped on land targets and that's pointless now because the next major conflict is going to be over resources. That said I'm fucking everything that moves until my nuts rot off.

>>31717951
90 percent of fallout falls out (hence the fucking name) of the atmosphere within 3 weeks of detonation.

>>31722944
and where does the fall out falls, so we don't have to worry about it?
it falls everywhere nigga, in your water, on your soil, all over your cattle and crops, and enters the food chain, infiltrate water sources and is absorbed by plants...
radiation don't goes away that easy

>>31722744
most of modern civilization would die withing the month if we ran out of electricity.
not you, of course /k/, I'm sure you have a year worth of water and canned goods.

>>31718011
Get a P320 compact for a pistol. 9mm or .40 it doesn't matter because all you will need is a slide mags and barrel to convert it.

You can get a quality AR for less than 1,000 dollars if you hurry. Just look for a mid length gas system if you can, and everything else will work out.

>>31717724
unnaground

>Tampa
Well I take solace knowing I'll die pretty quick due to about 10 warheads being dropped in my general vacinity. Oppen has already been over this scenario, however. There aren't enough nukes on either side to kill more than several million people due to how targets for nuclear bombardment are actually chosen.

>>31717951
>in the following years, then decades, centuries and millennia

Oh yeah, that's why Hiroshima and Nagasaki were already rebuilt in 1949, and are flourishing cities today

File: 1476410477487.jpg (83KB, 552x589px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 552x589px

>>31724320
> What are different types of nukes?

>>31724399
So can you name a place that will be uninhabitable for centuries because of nukes?

>>31717697
Oh, not too worried about all that worldly stuff.
Ima be ruptured by the angles.

>>31724418
Chernobyl?

>>31724125
>implying Putin wont nuke major metro areas just to be a cunt

>>31724399
>>31724418
tl;dr people still want the land after they kill the people on it
if nukes are used, it is to accomplish the goal of completely reking your opponent
if your opponent is completely rekt, their land is there for the taking
if their land is there for the taking, you don't want it to be an irradiated, inhospitable shithole
if you don't want the land to be an irradiated, inhospitable shithole, you use airburst nukes to minimize fallout and maximize destruction

>>31717951
Bullshit, nuclear winter was a lie made to sell the treaties and we've had 520 atmospheric tests ( 1,352 total) radiation will be minimal, local affects at best.

>>31717951
This seems to be wrecking Chernobyl right now! Literally the zone meets fo3

File: welcome to Bikini.jpg (719KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 2000x1333px

>>31724399
considering the effieciency of later nuclear weapons, little boy and fat man were pretty dirty. look at the Bikini atoll, almost 70 nukes were tested there, and yet the radiation today is weak enough that you presumably can live there safely. To be sure, go fishing and replace/ dig over the earth where you grow stuff, just stay away from the coconuts. If you don't, it won't kill you either, but you should consider not having children

>>31724454
>because of nukes

File: 274.png (216KB, 726x351px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 726x351px

>>31724562
> Because of Russia's incompetence in making nukes.

>>31724579
>a nuclear power plant is a nuclear bomb

>>31724587
> When it blows up it is.

>>31721323
this. this is "i'm gonna raid the gun store" tier in terms of disaster perparedness

File: TD.jpg (156KB, 428x720px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 428x720px

day of rope

File: hqdefault (2).jpg (14KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 480x360px

>>31724608
No, they don't just explode dumbass. It's not a powder keg. I bet you think if you shoot a nuclear bomb it will explode, just like if you shoot a gas can it explodes.
Dumbass..

>>31718011
AK for rifle, and some sort of full sized 9mm for handgun. 9mm is one of the most common and popular handgun cartridges out there so you'll always be able to find ammo. And if shit DOESNT hit the fan, a full size 9mm is a fun gun to shoot.

>>31724608
nah
steam explosion

>>31724608
No its not, a power plant explodes because of pressure within the reactor, a nuclear bomb explodes due to a cascading nuclear reaction of U-238 or Pu-239/241.

File: d2k5OtL.png (163KB, 582x308px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 582x308px

>>31717697
Wait for the sweet release

>>31724641
Chernobyl Cause: Inadvertent explosion of core during emergency shutdown of reactor whilst undergoing power failure experiment

> When its run by incompetent Russians I guess they do "Just explode"

>>31724626
ooshtbhfam

>>31717951
>can agree
dear god didn't openhimer cure this bullshit we have done in the us alone over 2 thousand nuclear weapon detonations there are only 4 thousand or so nukes ready to go between us and Russia most of the radiation will disapate after 30 days.

it is simple, i grab rifle and i head outdoors with my 2 dimensional wife.

>>31724741
>didn't openhimer cure this bullshit
Apparently not.

>>31724764
where do people even get this shit don't they learn about how half lives work and shit in highschool because I sure as hell did.

>>31724778
the most intensly radioactive and dangerous fallout dissipates with in 24 hours the longer lasting isotopes tend to last around a moth and with in that time frame you can spend time out side in increasingly long periods of time just don't fucking drink the water. you can eat pre packaged food and drinks though as they are uncontaminated.

>>31718011
>does not jam easily.
revolver of course

>>31724764
openheimer was an alarmist

>>31724878
What?
Are you kidding?

>>31724677
in Chernobyl, they drained way too much cooling water from the reactor core to see what would happen if such occurred unexpectedly. They realised the core temperature rose far too quickly, and pumped all the cooling water back into the reactor. At that point though it was too late, and they dropped the control rods, whose graphite tips spiked the nuclear reaction one more time (bad design)
>thiswastoomuch.jpg
The core begann to melt, and all the cooling water inside the reactor turned to steam within seconds. The immense pressure of the expanding steam just blew the 1000 tons heavy reactor cover through the machine hall roof. It was NOT a nuclear explosion, and it did NOT result in a typical mushroom cloud either, think more of a steam boiler explosion, due to the heat of the core meltdown

george patton was right
soviets were the baddies

File: lobsterback.jpg (126KB, 850x1132px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 850x1132px

>>31718011
build an AR. Spend a little while on /ARG/, trying to avoid cancer, and then spend ~750 on the rifle.
as for the handgun, all handguns are shit by definition. Get a police trade-in compact 9mm, or a used polymer 9mm compact.
If you don't want to worry about buying though, get a glock 19 and ruger AR556

File: 1466543299626.jpg (277KB, 324x632px) Image search: [Google]

277KB, 324x632px

>>31721137
gay ass guns&ammo tax, WA laws (no FA, underb&s can't shoot w/o legal guardian, UBCs)
It's very beautiful though

>>31724617
Well what would you do Rambo?

>>31724608
You do realize the concentration of enriched Uranium in a nuke plant is in the single digits percentwise, while a bomb requires over 99% enriched uranium in order to detonate properly?

>>31724660
U-235.

>>31717697

Literally just die. I'm within spitting distance of a major US military base. I will be vaporized.

File: new filters.png (49KB, 4096x2160px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 4096x2160px

Nothing, like most of you. Your middle-class suburb isn't worth a nuke that could be tasked to an actual threat or strategic target.

Duck and Cover and don't drink the water.

>>31724778
Fallout video games and movies written by liberals.

File: 1454651941475.jpg (19KB, 390x356px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 390x356px

I'd half prefer an alien invasion to a nuclear war.

Seriously. At least I'd have one life-long question answered.

Although real aliens needing use of the earth would have ridiculously potent, almost god-like technology. They can probably make all 7,000,000,000 people (including the ones hiding in bunkers deep underground) disintegrate in a nanosecond while leaving everything else pristine and untouched.

>>31725621
It depends on the type of nuclear warfare
>tactical, limited, full-scale, etc.
and your location in relation to a threat or a strategic target
>being near an airbase, or downwind from the rocky mountain silos

File: 5978111+_36b2f54894f3d87a8a8000ec98333a68.png (68KB, 325x320px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 325x320px

>>31726500

File: 1346246481676.gif (3MB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 400x225px

>>31724320
> he don't know nukes today are more than hundred times stronger... and more radioactive.

File: 1378830084187.jpg (14KB, 183x191px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 183x191px

>>31724520
>1,352 tests, along several decades
if we have a nuclear war, there will be much more than 1,352 nuclear detonations all around the planet, in the same hour...

>>31725085
well, I'd wish for nuclear death too.

>>31722756
SKS for woods
M16 for boonies

>>31721155
Macкa-Щ

>>31724532
That's how nuclear weapons work. When fission occurs the nuclear material becomes a different material with a much shorter half life.

>>31729303
Eh, thats not likely.

>>31717697
Get away from the blast zone before radiation rains from the sky or hunker down and try to radiation proof the walls of a hidey-hole to sit out the 3 day contamination period. Then maybe sit out another day. Also, paint "1 survivor" on my door, so someone might knock when rescue happens. Hopefully some method of counting time and some snackage/drinkage so I'm not terribly uncomfortable. Also, a bucket

>>31729386
On the topic, not siding against or in favor the theory thousands of nukes would blow in a nuclear war, how many, among all those nuke stockpiles, are actually ready to be deployed if Putin decides to put in the WW III? anyone have an idea? they cant be all strapped to ICBMS and ready to fly, or can they?

>>31717898
That file name.
My sides.

>>31723153
Ummmm actually...

File: FB_IMG_1476886304107.jpg (116KB, 1152x720px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 1152x720px

>>31724971

File: 1388899236151.png (32KB, 154x183px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 154x183px

>>31724125
>tfw my work is just outside of the thermal radiation radius of a hit at MacDill by a topol

File: Are+actually+said+to+myself+quot+are+you+me+quot+_3059297b76a1e9bfcc7304bc431a183e.jpg (67KB, 600x451px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 600x451px

>>31729892
>not having a stock pile of supplies in your reinforced basement

goddamn, /k/ommando, go buy rice, honey and bottle water RIGHT NOW!
and you better wear you cammo t-shirt while you are at wall mart buying crates of those, screaming about world war three, or I'm calling you a casual!

>>31730158
bonus popints for wearing a maga hat and saying hillary already rigged the election and civil war 2 electric boogaloo is happening

>>31730173
aw right, now we are talking.

>>31718011
AR is probably the best bet simply because you're in the states.

Anywhere else on the planet, you'd probably want an AK.

As far as handguns go, you'll really want a good revolver as a back up. I've got a .357 in my pack at all times just in case. But I keep an Arex in my holster simply because I like the 9mm capacity it affords.

>>31729303
>Implying that makes any difference
It wouldn't be permanent, it wouldn't cover everything, it's not like nukes multiply each other's damage you fucking retarded cunt.

>>31717869
>be me
>in class regarding corrosion
>click link thinking my volume is off
>very surprised when phone is on full volume
>instructor looks at me
>"fuck?"
>instructor nods

god danmit...

>>31719983
Found the edgy frogposter

>>31717697

Noone will use the Tsar bomba, unless its on New York.

The real tactical strikers are 1 in the middle and 6 around the center on.

Each around 150-400kt.

>>31726500
I'd prefer a Resistance: Fall of Man-style invasion. That way we actually have a fighting chance and bring home pretty cool stories of fighting ayys across the breadth and span of Europe while we're at it. Failing that, Muv-Luv style, although I don't really know that would work IRL.

>>31729554
>how many
About 1600 strategic warheads.

>>31730407
>Noone will use the Tsar bomba, unless its on New York.
>The real tactical strikers are 1 in the middle and 6 around the center on.

WTF are you talking about?

File: tumblr_nxmz2xjydY1ulyp4wo1_1280.jpg (335KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

335KB, 1280x720px

>>31717697
CRAWL OUT TO THE FALLOUT, BABAY

>>31729296
see >>31724532

File: image.jpg (238KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1600x900px

>>31730628
I don't wanna set the fire but I'd love to watch it burn.

>>31717697
I live about a mile from BAE systems so I'm basically guaranteed to be fried in the first blast.

>>31730500
He's right you know. Nuclear yields > 50MT release most of their energy into space, thus not making a very efficient weapon of destruction. Both the US and the Soviets figured that out in the late 50ies/ early 60ies, and began producing more, but smaller warheads. It's much more effective if you throw 3-5 200KT nukes at a city than if you choose one single 50MT. Also, it's easier to intercept one missile than it is with 3-5 separate

File: all i have to offer is this old map of potential NATO targets in polish.jpg (900KB, 2100x1783px) Image search: [Google]

900KB, 2100x1783px

Right lads, anyone got infographics and shit for surviving fallout/the optimal bug-out bag contents?

I live close to the Russian border and it's about time I started at least thinking about preparing for a nuclear disaster. Even if my cuntry doesn't get a direct hit, I'm guessing there will be fallout for a while.

All I got currently is a small pack of iodine tablets and a portable battery-powered radio, and I hope the shelter in the building's basement will be open.

>>31730268

>playing with your phone in class

You're paying a lot of money for a class that you're wasting

>>31730500

Larger payloads require different delivery platforms. It's cheaper just to standardize on one size of nuke, so instead of making the biggest fucking bombs you can, you just hit a target with five smaller ones if you really want it dead.

Shitpost profusely while blaring the playlist I made for this until EMP kills my electronics.

>>31722777

>that feel when regardless of the centuries of complex human engineering and extremely devastating weapons we've developed using the rarest allows, using the smartest minds, the deadliest weapon remains a fucking rock

>>31721137
No, at least not yet. But Its going to be one of the first places to strike by the bombs