HOLLIS Vs. HOLDER/LYNCH

Thread replies: 19
Thread images: 12

Anonymous
HOLLIS Vs. HOLDER/LYNCH 2016-10-18 04:15:06 Post No. 31715768
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: hands up dont suit.jpg (8KB, 270x187px) Image search: [Google]

HOLLIS Vs. HOLDER/LYNCH Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:15:06 Post No. 31715768 [Report]

Hands up, don't suit!!!

What's the word on the machine gun suit?
I haven't heard and can't find anything new in a really long time

https://hellerfoundation.org/about/hollis-vs-holder/

https://www.scribd.com/doc/296125465/2005-Approved-Form-1

http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_1_5/1681489_NFA_cases__Hollis_and_Watson_v__Lynch___So_who_wants_to_see_an_approved_form_1__p_160.html&page=161

/k/ humor dump until this thread picks up

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:15:50 Post No.31715774
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:15:50 Post No.31715774 [Report]

>>31715768
They refused an en banc review. So the case is dead.

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:18:55 Post No.31715809
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:18:55 Post No.31715809 [Report]

File: dick flare gun.jpg (551KB, 2000x1127px) Image search: [Google]

551KB, 2000x1127px

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:19:13 Post No.31715814
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:19:13 Post No.31715814 [Report]

>>31715774
From what I gathered about "en banc" review, the circuit court it was headed to denied it from being heard?

Does that mean Hollis could appeal to a higher court, or that the court itself didn't give a first fucking response to appeal?

>sorry, not lawfag here

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:21:34 Post No.31715851
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:21:34 Post No.31715851 [Report]

File: Carl.jpg (31KB, 354x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 354x500px

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:23:28 Post No.31715880
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:23:28 Post No.31715880 [Report]

File: DISARMAMENT MAN.gif (103KB, 741x1029px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 741x1029px

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:30:59 Post No.31715967
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:30:59 Post No.31715967 [Report]

File: movie theater gummie bears.jpg (43KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 720x540px

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:32:49 Post No.31715983
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:32:49 Post No.31715983 [Report]

File: Shaq shot grouping.jpg (68KB, 719x725px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 719x725px

>>31715814
>>31715774
weren't there two similar cases in different districts

The Deplorable Phil (ID: !!esSirF6LRYN) 2016-10-18 04:33:15 Post No.31715988
[Report]

The Deplorable Phil (ID: !!esSirF6LRYN) 2016-10-18 04:33:15 Post No.31715988 [Report]

>>31715814
It means any alphabet soup agency can make shit up as it goes along and we have no legal recourse.

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:34:36 Post No.31715998
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:34:36 Post No.31715998 [Report]

Kind of hard to appeal to the Supreme Court at this point with Scalia dead.

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:35:21 Post No.31716003
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:35:21 Post No.31716003 [Report]

>>31715768
TL;DR of it is that the case failed and the appeal was rejected. It's dead. We lost this time.

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:38:34 Post No.31716037
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:38:34 Post No.31716037 [Report]

>>31716003
NOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOoOo

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:40:09 Post No.31716057
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:40:09 Post No.31716057 [Report]

File: harry potter 1911.jpg (91KB, 500x817px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 500x817px

you think they could at least update the website...
>https://hellerfoundation.org/about/hollis-vs-holder/
i'll continue to humor dump

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:40:41 Post No.31716065
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-10-18 04:40:41 Post No.31716065 [Report]

>>31716037

Don't Lynch yourself yet ( get it? fuck you.)

No seriously, depending on the outcome of this election and who ends up on the supreme court in the next four years, we MIGHT have a chance of at least reopening this or at the very least overturning stupid shit like suppressor, SBR, and SBS taxes.