Thoughts on the Colt Mustang?

S'alright.
SIG 938 is better though.

>>31709098
Would carry if released in 9mm

>>31709098
the S&W Corvette is 2x as good

>>31709142
>>31709161

P938 is 9mm, P238 is the SIG's equivalent of Mustang, chambered .380.

I've got both - like P938 better, P238 just doesn't have that punch. However, it is very clear that P238 is the original design, and P938 is "enlarged" P238.

Carry wise, I wouldn't say they're that different in bulk - if you think you can get away with carrying P238, then in most cases P938 would be just as fine.

>>31709416
I've heard the 938s have reliability issues. They also cost way too much for something that doesn't have a spotless reputation.

238s on the other hand, do seem to have a spotless reputation.

>>31709098
Should rename it to the colt pony.

anything Mustang should be atleast .45 acp. Its kinda like when ford had that terrible shitbox mustang.

File: 1474919668649.gif (2MB, 480x270px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x270px

>>31709166
>Implying a 'vette is only 2x as good as a 'stang

>>31711080
>938 reliability issues
My experience is that it depends on how you lubricate it, that it is picky about. It looks like it likes it wet, and doesn't like it dry. I'd also say that it likes the Lucas Oil that comes in a box with it very well - but don't let it dry out (that's a concern with a carry weapon, you might just forget)
>238 spotless reputation
In my book, they're the same.

I still carry the 938, but now that I got comfortable with it, I'm considering switching to P226 IWB. That one really never misses a bit no matter how neglected it is.

>>31709098
I like it better than the sigs. I would get the aluminum version, it's not much heavier.

>>31709142
Though the Sigs look terrible by comparison