Which one should I get, /k/? >USP 45/HK45 >FNX45 >P220

Glock 17/19

File: Viper2.jpg (54KB, 680x680px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 680x680px

>>31635251
wow terrible just terrible..

P220 is great, Fnx has capacity

File: 673476347.jpg (61KB, 800x500px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x500px

You already know, OP.

>>31635235
USP. Shouldn't even be a question, it shits all over its competition. Also my favorite handgun of all time.

File: image.jpg (134KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 640x640px

I usually base my purchases of .45s off the capacity-to-size/bulk ratio, but ultimately it's all up to your personal preference in the end.

>>31635235
FNX.

>>31635235
5 dragon dildos

>>31635235
You should join the squishy masterrace

>>31635235
The only bad thing about the USP is the rails. Other than that it's based

It's fucked up that for as long as they've been around HK pistols are still some of the hardest to get parts/accessories for. And then there's the price...

At least fingerfuck them before you buy. Don't buy sight unseen.

My vote is FNX, followed by USP. Something about the grips on sigs rub me the wrong way. I'm weird though.

File: image-20160806_165430.jpg (1MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x1836px

Usp 45, there fucking sweet

Not trolling, why do so many people here seem to prefer the USP45 over the HK45? I've never shot either for the record, just a lot of 9mm/40 guns.

File: HK no comprmise.webm (219KB, 352x198px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 352x198px

>>31635235
USP 45 because its soft shooting for a .45 and actually has character and sex appeal.

File: image.png (153KB, 1136x640px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 1136x640px

>>31635285
Reminder that everyone hates you

File: DSC02095.jpg (3MB, 4116x2700px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4116x2700px

>>31636950
USP is larger, more capacity. Softer to shoot.

Also it's way more sexier.

File: 14650138_10210888090381232_5523830736679567646_n.jpg (152KB, 802x476px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 802x476px

>>31638357
This.

P220 10 mm

>>31636950
More capacity, a bit cheaper but not really that different if you have big hands. The decocker isn't as big either.

The only downside is its a bitch to put a light on it compared to the Hk45, and if you have small hands the HK45 is more ergonomic. Since most people buy these as toys It doesn't matter if they can put a light on it.

USP Elite, Expert or Mark 23?

debating same thing for my suppressor host.

>>31637061
Reminder, that's the way I like it, it lets me know how bad I trigger the kiddies

>>31635235
>2016
>buying HK shit
FNX45.

>>31635235
Got usp45 last year. Wife loved it so much had to get usp9sd. And of course hers had to be new.. Bank ACCOUNT still hasn't recovered but our range time has never been better.

Take that fn autist with no hasguns gf

>>31635235
usp 45 or you're forever a faggot

I have an irrational hatred of the usp 45, no idea why

take the sig

>>31639953
>I act like a bitch and I'm glad I have no friends.
>Le Triggered shitlord!!

K.

>>31635235
Off the list? Probably the HK45. Have fun getting hk to give a shit about you though.

Otherwise why .45? Muh caliber?

1911 or P220

File: 1469312006234.jpg (83KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 500x500px

>>31635235
Hello brother!

Kinda funny, for like a week now I've been looking over USP 45 Tactical vs FNX 45 Tactical.

lurking this thread.

>>31640944
I want a modern .45. I already have a 9mm.