Would you kill a surrendering enemy/group of enemies?

Not until I sodomize them first

Most of /k/ would shit themselves and cry if they had to go to war, anon.

>>31608870

Depends on what color they are.

White-alright
Brown-Gun 'em down (sandniggers)
yellow-kill a fellow
Nigger-pull the trigger

>>31608856
No, why would you ever? Even if the enemy does it, it's up to you to be the more professional soldier.

>>31608856
Depends.

Depends.

Are the radical mud shots? Yes, and double tap em too

Is the food supply low already? Would taking on prisoners strain an already weakened supply? Yes

>>31608888
This

>>31608856
Not without giving them a cigarette.

>>31608888
>humiliating your own race

Plebs.

>brown bend em down
>yellow make him yell "oh"
>Nigger prove that your dick's bigger

File: image.jpg (16KB, 305x165px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 305x165px

Look! I washed for supper!

>>31608943
>Is the food supply low already? Would taking on prisoners strain an already weakened supply?
eat the pow's

>>31608856

Depends on when and how they surrendered.

If they shot at me a second ago and killed my buddy, then sure.

>>31608856
Only if they weren't white.

Or if one of them shot my best fried five minutes ago. Then they should have surrendered sooner.

>>31608856
Only if I thought keeping them alive might be too dangerous. Taking prisoners is pretty always better than killing them all.

File: M A D M A N.jpg (92KB, 1080x810px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1080x810px

>>31608856
depends on the enemy im facing

a radical jihadist? better dead they will never change, but if it was regular soldier in the opposing army and they voluntarily surrender i have no reason to shoot a defenseless man

File: image.jpg (51KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 601x508px

>>31609034
>mfw he was speaking Czech and was trying to tell the Americans that they were conscripted by the Germans and didn't fire any shots

Don't believe me? Go Czech.

>>31609272
This.

>>31609200
This.

Only if they're commies, because in that case they're probably trying some dirty trick where they pretend to surrender and then another one shoots you or they blow themselves up or something. Fucking commies.

>>31608856
Depends on if they are reglar army folks or jihadi.

Regular army gets treated as PoWs per regulations
Jihadi never surrender, even if they fly the white flag and reach for the sky. No mercy, no survivors.

from what i know soldier who is throwing his rifle away and put his hands in the air is a just a desreter and this kind of action doesn't count as a surrender which should be done by commander of his unit

Yes. In any situation. Its war. What kind of faggot surrenders anyway?

>>31609281
I came expecting stormies and normies going at it to laugh at idiotic racist rhetoric

Not to feel..

>>31609534
You, when there's a flamethrower pointed into your bunker.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_3QeW9hgpE

>>31608856

The Laws of War say that is illegal.

>>31609920
Laws of war only applies to humans. Sandniggers arent even on the level of cockroaches.

>>31608856

paging Cpl Upham, Cpl Upham please report

>>31608888
nah yellows are alright
not
>yellow-play it mellow

>>31609920
>Laws of War only apply to those that abide by the Laws of War

>>31608856
No. If you do, the others will be unwilling to surrender. They will fight to the death, which will make your war harder. Be very kind to those who surrender, merciless to those who don't.

>>31608856

Situation dependent. Is recovery of actionable intelligence likely? Do you have sufficient resources to detain and transport? Then no. Otherwise, waste the motherfuckers

>>31608856
Depends, am I in a situation where I can actually take all of them prisoner and secure transport to a POW camp? Yes.

Did like 10 dudes in the middle of buttfuck nowhere get the jump on 30 reds? Sorry, mass execution time.

File: remove partisan.jpg (110KB, 967x718px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 967x718px

>kebab is to be removed from premises immediately
>all others better hope you've got room, time, and food for their asses

>>31608856
Only if they're white

File: 1388269015904.jpg (44KB, 400x550px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 400x550px

>>31610644
>Sorry, mass execution time.

>>31610083

no. that's not how it works at all. you obey what you signed even if the other side doesn't.

>>31608856

>>92075014

File: dresden-firebombing-70th-anniversary[1].jpg (407KB, 1180x787px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1180x787px

>>31611556
This guy is right, everyone.

>>31608856
depends what my sarge/LT says

>>31611704
He says follow the fucking Geneva convention you dumbfuck.

File: 1393725694330.gif (226KB, 500x276px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 500x276px

>>31611724
lol didn't sign

>>31611724
does it applies to muslims?

>>31611556
If they fake surrender wearing explosive vests even once, I would not let any give up.

File: Sarge_S10.png (671KB, 749x729px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 749x729px

>>31608870
Private Donut!

What have I told you about making up words! We have a reputation to uphold, we don't want stoop down to the level of those honorless blues

>>31608856
Depends on their savage level. Savages only pretend to surrender, they have no concept of honor.

So basically yes if they're not white.

>>31611556
No, that's not how it works.

>>31608856
Depends on the type, radicals will be shot, ATF will be shot also depends if I have the means to house them. Food doesn't matter, they can eat each other

>>31608856
There's surrendering before a battle, clearly and in good faith.

Then there's "surrendering" when you're already in combat (have fired at us), then realizing you're losing, and trying to pussy out. That's not surrendering, and the battle isn't over until it's over.

>>31608856
No, unless they were known to have committed extremely unethical acts/ war crimes (rape, attacking civilians, torture and murder of their own prisoners, etc.)

Only if they were the Airbats...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cu9ekJRqgM

>>31608856
idk do his boots look about the same size as mine?

>>31609281
Who cares. They still were the ones pulling the trigger. Who fucking cares what country they're from.

They weren't murdered for their political ideology or their snazzy uniforms, they were shot dead because they were shooting at the allies like 20 minutes prior

File: 1470492967443.jpg (1MB, 1600x1000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x1000px

It depends.
>Any middle-eastern nation excluding Kuwait and Qatar
(((MOWING INTENSIFIES)))
>Russians
TIK-TAK TIK-TAK TIK
>Everyone else
[contacts CP for further instruction}

>>31612813
> Wants to kill Russians
> But not Qatari

Wew lad
e
w

l
a
d

>>31612822
I'm deep Slavic. You can never trust a Russian.

Qataris *can* be nice. That's better than a Russian, which can only be Russian.

>>31612827
> "deep slavic"
> hates russians

Khokhol spotted

>>31610524
This

>>31612832
MORE LIKE EVERY OTHER SLAV SPOTTED
WHO DID THE RUSSIANS FUCK OVER
FUCK YOU BURGER
FUCK YOU VATNIK
YOU DON'T KNOW THE DOG RUSSIAN
FUCK YOU

>>31612827
deep faggot more like it.

I sometimes wonder how much of this shit went on, probably heaps. You see stories about big warcrimes of summary executions but think of how much shit goes on in todays society let alone in all out war with millions of people across an entire country.

There weren't police and cctv watching over the shoulder of everyone, how many times do you think a small group of friends found a couple of lone surviving soldiers or even civilians in a bush somewhere and just blew their brains out before reporting back that they were KIA

>>31612836
Are you from a former Soviet state? Are you a polak? Are you some Eesti seanigger who's shit got pushed in? Are you the descendant of a proto-mongoloid finnish rice farmer? Or maybe a romanian gipsy?

If there's one tendency you can discern amongst the countries that have a culture of hatred for Russia, a pattern if you like, it's that they all got fucking buttbamboozled at one point by the russkies kek

File: 1471629349094.jpg (10KB, 244x207px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 244x207px

>>31612758
>They didn't fire any shots
>They didn't pull any triggers

>Who cares. They still were the ones pulling the trigger.

>>31612854
>expecting a retard who tries to justify executing prisoners of war to be anything but a brain dead nigger
c'mon now.

>kill niggers, muslims and russians
>spare the rest
The only real choice.

Depends who i'm fighting.
If im fighting conscripts then no.
If im fighting ISIS i would shoot them with bacon wrapped bullets

Only if you were in there OP

>>31608985
This guy knows it

>>31608985
ayyyy

>>31612849
Funny how western yuro cucks try to teach eastern europeans on how to act towards Russians. You never had to live next to and endure those barbarians.

>Inb4 based putin
>inb4 butthurt belt

File: 14031083_1169814456412650_1765540150_n.gif (570KB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

570KB, 500x280px

>>31609014

File: 151093.jpg (237KB, 614x654px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 614x654px

>>31608856
even though edgyfags might say different. if anything you want to encourage enemy to surrender by treating them fairly. cause this makes your war efforts easier in the future. chinese were pretty darn willing to surrender to the japs prior to the rape of nanking, for example. some might even say the incident marked the beginning of the japs losing their firm foothold in china.

obviously you still gonna get fanatics try to feint surrendering to do harm. but that actually would cause less hindrance for your overall war effort compared to if you just slaughter all the surrendering combatant and having them all fight you to the death.

Got to have prisoners for a prison exchange.

>>31608856
If there is reason to believe the surrendering soldiers are bluffing yes

>>31608891
I am a faggot, the post, at least you didin`t say that is the "moral thing to do" or some BS like that.