is this an abomination, /k/ ?

>>31601949
>is this an abomination, /k/ ?
>Trijicon-4x32-ACOG-with-RMR-Reflex-Sight-L12998451.jpg

>>31601949
>he's poor

>>31601949
>plain black ACOG with RMR

Yes, the ECOS is the big money baller's choice.

>>31601949
You can't beat a trijicon, not even close to an abomination.

Its a stopgap thing, in the next 10-20 years it'll have been rendered totally obsolete by the prevalence of variable (think elcan specter) or dual view (think D-Evo) optics. For now its fine, but future generations will look back and laugh at us for having such a massive HoB.

>>31602276
>massive HoB.

It's a nonissue with the ACOG. I thought the same way until I purchased my ECOS. Using it showed me the light so to speak.

File: 35243d1422824957-new-hotness-image.jpg (2MB, 2310x3084px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2310x3084px

>>31602255
>ACOG
>Big money
Fucking poverty ruins people>>31602255

>>31602276
What's wrong with height over barrel? It's comfy.

>>31602297

It's all relative. Do I have glass that cost more than my ECOS? Yes. Would a "normal" person ever spring for an ECOS when a Holosun would accomplish everything for him? Fuck no

>>31602297
shittttttt thats an expensive piece of glass.

you could have posted something thermal if you really wanted them to feel poor.

File: svcar.jpg (559KB, 2433x1071px) Image search: [Google]

559KB, 2433x1071px

>>31602319
Thermal is for detection
Clip on nods are for shooting

File: 48544.jpg (45KB, 600x407px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 600x407px

>>31602276
> by the prevalence of variable (think elcan specter)
But the world of high speed low drag already went full circle and came to double sights combo. Again.

>>31602297
>scar h
>s&b

>butler creek covers

>many great 1-6 optics available on the market for ~2k or less
>stick two optics on the rifle instead.

I really don't understand why people do this.

File: 1467607661255.gif (1MB, 260x260px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 260x260px

>>31602388
>Dat DAGR system

>>31602448

Combat proven reliability

The RMR mounted that high up puts Russian chinwelds to shame. If you want a red dot with your ACOG/scope mount it off to the side.

>>31602477

>implying variable optics are somehow untested

>>31602388
> 25x zoom on an automatic
for what purpose?

>>31602448
1-6 is slower than a 1x and a 4x

>>31602495
That's 3-18x
Useful for 1000m shots

>>31602448
Speed of transition? Competition shooters been there already and invented offset irons.

>>31602482

>implying the piggybacked RMR is for actually aiming long enough to necessitate a weld of any kind

>>31602424
Lol I saw this too. I mean yeah we all use them but one reason I really like Leupold scopes is the covers. Seems like something a lot of companies miss.

>>31602276
I dunno. A fixed 4x ACOG is pretty great out to 300. I haven't used an Elcan, does the image jump out at you like an ACOG? Good glass is #1 for me.

>>31602517
>Useful for 1000m shots
The one you will ever take, anyway.

>>31601949
tryhard tier

File: 1422766811413.jpg (100KB, 765x569px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 765x569px

worldsTallestOptics.jpg

>>31602141
shuddup cat killing attention whore

>9001 HOB
>transitioning to 45 degrees to shoot off eye rather than just using an offset optic.

Yeah, pretty fucking stupid.