ITT more like this.
>>31554799
Supposing such a thing is even possible, why exactly is it that fucking massive? It seems to me that you'd want to make such an advanced aircraft as small as humanly possible to save on the cost of it's skin. Stealth skin is already expensive as it is, and nothing even close to av-cam has ever been demonstrated to exist in a form suitable for military application.
>>31554822
Just a wild guess, but I think it's that big in the diagram because that's how big witnesses have said it looked to them from the ground. this design is very obviously based on a famous series of UFO reports in which witnesses saw a chevron of five lights in the sky moving slowly.
ARV Fluxliner
do some research, connect the dots
>>31554833
Seems like it would be massively cost inefficient to coat such a huge aircraft in a stealth skin, much less some kind of active camouflage. Also here's a primitive stealth aircraft that has actually been verified to exist, assuming of course OP is interested at all in things which actually exist.
>>31554892
nah m8 this is an /x/ thread
>>31554852
holy shit this is redpill
>>31554892
The horten wasnt made to be stealthy it was ment to fit the 3x1000 program
>>31554892
The only stealthy aspect of the Ho 229 was the fact that it was a flying wing, it didn't have any radar-absorbing capabilities beyond that.
>>31554926
>>31554941
True, the few minimal stealth properties were probably less a result of intention and more a result of coincidence. Still a pretty neat plane though.
>>31554926
there was some stealth
one of the horten bros did some shit with the paint i forget though
it was done to help them penetrate the british home radar. According to Northrops tests it would havd allowed the hortens to not be identified until they were 20 minutes out which would have made interception very difficult
Here's a photograph of the TR-3B
>>31554799
>post black projects
>>31554891
u-209 was presumed lost with all hands on may seventh 1943. it was able to report to its sister ship u-954 that its transmitter was heavily damaged among other things..
>>31554799
these and the black triangles are no joke man you dont want to fuck around with this kind of stuff
>>31554799
>black project
>>31554915
explain pls
>>31554799
This thread has been seized by the Central Intelligence Agency. From now on anyone who will post will be logged. No further comments shall be made.
>>31556896
Bane?
>>31554822
Most likely the plane would carry large volumes of heavy equipment and components and thus it's larger to gain lift.
The design looks retarded aerodynamically, i doubt it would actually fly (even then, fly straight).
Let me just tell you that the B2 is a 60 year old design and that our secret planes now our already 60 years ahead of that piece of crap, in fact I doubt one can even call it a plane these days
>>31555018
underrated
>>31556402
Shiiieeeet
>>31554799
Why would you put 5 giant lights underneath!?
>>31554799
Love these threads. Keep up the guess work guys.
>>31554799
>VSTOL
>Global Reach
If they wanted range they would not be using VSTOL, any physicists or engineers on tonight?
>>31557855
to make it check out with the UFO sightings of course
>>31554852
>>31554915
Pls esblain