How would /K/ kill a Weeping Angel?

>>31441869
Put it in a mirror box. Let the thing that lives in the darkness behind the recursions take care of them.

>>31441869
with antidepressants

>>31441869
Put it in a cum jar

>>31441869
You know flamethrowers? Like that but with eyeballs

>>31441869
By waking up in the real world

>>31441933
I take it you dont play video games or read books either, Mister no-fantasy,

File: PTRD_rifle_and_cleaning_kit.jpg (714KB, 2171x1110px) Image search: [Google]

714KB, 2171x1110px

>>31441869

>>31441869
>>31441943
Fuck off to >>>/x/

This discussion is as useful as 100 marines vs. Stick

>>31441964
Yeah, I know right. Stick would obviously fucking win its a fucking stick, it's as hard as a rock

Chisel

get 8 people to form an English square
provide over watch with >>31441948

>>31441988
A marine is guaranteed to die eventually
A stick can't die

>>31442044
And sticks break bones. A marine can only use words which will never hurt you

>>31442083
Technically the marines could also throw stones that break bones but the stick has no bones.

Stick cannot lose.

>>31442183
Right but then they'd be rock marines, not just marines

>>31441869
Put it in SCP-173 cell

>>31441869
in theory isn't it just a statue when you look at it? wouldn't that make it susceptible to the same things as concrete?

>>31441869
Look away as I fingerblast it to death. I hope she comes in peace

>>31442043
but guns are banned in England

>>31442208
Marine snaps stick
Then you have 2 stick
Stick win everytime

>>31442406
Marine puts stick inside him, marine becomes tree. Tree is many stick. Stick is alway superior

>>31442291
Came here to post this.

>>31442387
But not in Maple England.

>>31442208
Marines adapt and overcome, but they cannot overcome stick.

walk into room, close eyes, open eyes, walk out of room, lock the door behind me

Dr Who has the worst thought out enemies ever

fucking stairs how do they work?

File: HTB1dz27LXXXXXbaaXXXq6xXFXXXk[1].jpg (88KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 800x800px

cover your self in mylar emergency blanket. even if you are not looking at them. there is still a mirror image of themselves to look back at them.

>>31444695
I think they can teleport through locked doors

>>31441948
>>31442018
>>31442366
When observed, an Angel appears to just be a stone statue, but it's not quite. It's "quantum locked" (because Doctor Who physics), and thus is basically indestructible. You can move it around, but the Angel's pose and physical state is essentially fixed. No amount of firepower is going to crack it in that form.
>>31444695
Now you just have an unobserved Angel in an easily-escapable room. A locked door isn't gonna be a very effective barrier for an Angel.

Let's be honest though, the most /k/ solution is the easiest here.
>Acquire flamethrower
>Close eyes
>Pull trigger and flail wildly about
>Hope that non-quantum locked Angels aren't fireproof

>>31444847

Why not just get some robot with cameras on them and a nuke or some other bomb and switch off the camera, then detonate the nuke?

>>31444847
>unobserved
What counts as observing one? If I can smell it move would that be enough? What if I get it on a pressure sensitive plate and it will sound an alarm if it moves off of it?

Throw it into space

File: A trained eagle closes in on a drone-780x520.jpg (270KB, 780x520px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 780x520px

Launch them into the Sun.

>>31441915
unfortunately that little girl isn't much of a fighter. but it would at least keep the angel in check.

Shoot it

Get some blokes staring at it
Tie a tripwire round it attached to a big fucking bomb a few feet away
Leave

>>31441869
*unsheathes katana*
*teleports behind it*
nothing personnel, kid

File: 1469192252159.jpg (53KB, 599x554px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 599x554px

>>31441988

>>31444951
I guess you have to looka at it. I don't know. I don't watch dr. literally who

>>31442044
It will eventually be buried, compressed, lithified, and millions of years later become coal

>>31445244
why not just light the stick on fire then it's burnt up

>>31445381

Now it has volatilized into essence of stick and is pervasive in the environment. You have only succeeded in giving it greater territorial control.

File: trick-shot.jpg (50KB, 900x484px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 900x484px

>>31441869

>>31445409
>if you strike me down I shall become more powerful than you could possibly ever imagine

Fucking
Stick
Jedi

>>31441988
every time you break stick you get two more sticks! stick can't die. unless it fights fire. If 100 marines fought a stick soon the there would just be 10,000 sticks! then stick win

>>31441869
C4, it solves everything!

>>31445169

That aint gonna work, its just going to come back angry and on fire.

>>31441869
by rolling my eyes at it

Id say you could hook up several cameras to watch it and have the livestream embedded and autoplayinng on every single porn page, itd never be unobserved.

However, from what i can remember the image of it on a monitor can take on its form and then transfer itself to your fucking eye, amy pond had one growing in hers because shed seen it on screen and it would have explosively emerged if the dr hadnt done something.

>>>/x/

>>31446120
Yeah, any image - drawn, photographed or otherwise - will turn into a angel given time. However there is a method for completely disabling a weeping angel.

You throw it into a black hole, where no matter what it does, it can't escape. Alternatively you can place it in orbit and just leave it; they can move when unseen sure but they can't break physics and propel themselves off of nothing.

Also as mentioned, mirrors are their weakness or if there are multiple angels, getting them to form a "circle" where they are all looking at each other can keep them locked forever.

The image of an Angle IS an Angle.

Thanks OP.

>>31448608
Angel. Too much Saturday night.

>>31447614
>Put them in a circle
>Lights go out
>They can't see anymore
>Angels are free

Your strat is shit m8

Transmat them to the Library. Let them try to be unobserved by the Vashta Nerada.

suicide bomb tbqh.

strap explosives to chest, close eyes, click boom.

>>31441869
wink one eye at a time.
how is this concept even hard to understand. just keep winking until i can get close enough, and then use a drill or a buzzsaw or something else common and cheap with which i can destroy the stone. easy peasy

>>31444951

Quantum spookiness works even if you record the result on a tape and either watch it or delete it.

>>31441869
Step 1: Embed it in concrete up to the shoulders. Step 2: Let the concrete dry. Point gun at it. Close eyes. Pull trigger. Alternatively, just add a fresh layer of concrete over the exposed portion, and let the fucker drown.

>>31448839
Holy shit why did I never think of that?
>don't blink
Ok nigga Jesus I'll just open one eye at a time and offset my blink

as someone who has actually watched a fuckton of doctor who, i can tell you that weeping angels are scary as fuck. Basically, they cannot be destroyed with human firepower. Explosions, gunfire, fuckhuge guns. don't do jack fuck. and image, video, or recording of an angel can become an angel, meaning having a recording of one, and looking away from it while said recording plays, will result in the angle moving, even inside a recording, until it literally escapes the fucking recording. the only ways to stop them is to either have it so that something can constantly see it, without any period of time where it will not be seen. Mirrors are a favourite way to do this, as if it moves, it will observe itself, and it cannot move while being observed, no matter what is doing the observing.

>>31448644
Doesn't entirely work like that friendo, they have perception beyond that of humans (reference the doctor who episode in which they are stuck on a tomb world, in a cave network. The angels successfully navigate in the dark, thus showing they are able to sense through it). Thus they disable each other forever.


Alternatively, you place some long-term destabilising isotope that emits light, problem solved.

>>31441869
>Attach large thermite packs to Angle
>Attach string tied to feed and hands to trigger
>Step back 10 feet
>Blink

>>31441869
>look at it
>put in vat of most powerful destructive chemical I can get
>seal vat
>look away

File: 1474503850656.jpg (109KB, 738x640px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 738x640px

Wouldn't chucking one of these over an Angel disable it?

>>31448891
Quantum VCR, the state of what's recorded isn't known until it's observed.

Boom!

>>31450844
>>31449100
Hydrofluoric acid.
If it has living tissue, oxides or silicates, HF will destroy it.

>>31444951
It just means seeing them. Cameras will stop them as well, but they can move in-between the frames just like they can move when you blink, so you need multiple cameras to lock a weeping angle in place.

If you have two angles under observation, you can position their statues so that they face each other, which traps them for as long as they face each other.

>>31448831
They're too fast for that. As soon as an angle catches you, you get pulled back in time by a hundred years and the angle feeds on the quantum fuckery this causes.

File: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_1467675862623.png (651KB, 700x587px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 700x587px

>>31449686
>some long-term destabilising isotope that emits light,

>>31451294
Why not chlorine trifluoride? A more potent oxidizer than oxygen itself, able to set fire to things that are normally non-flammable.

A quote from John Drury Clark on its potential as a rocket fuel:
>"It is, of course, extremely toxic, but that's the least of the problem. It is hypergolic with every known fuel, and so rapidly hypergolic that no ignition delay has ever been measured. It is also hypergolic with such things as cloth, wood, and test engineers, not to mention asbestos, sand, and water — with which it reacts explosively. It can be kept in some of the ordinary structural metals — steel, copper, aluminum, etc. — because of the formation of a thin film of insoluble metal fluoride which protects the bulk of the metal, just as the invisible coat of oxide on aluminum keeps it from burning up in the atmosphere. If, however, this coat is melted or scrubbed off, and has no chance to reform, the operator is confronted with the problem of coping with a metal-fluorine fire. For dealing with this situation, I have always recommended a good pair of running shoes.

>>31449100
The obvious solution to the camera problem is to not have a fucking screen. You just use those go-pro cameras that record to a hard drive. Strap a bunch of them to yourself when working with angles and destroy the hard drives afterwards. Go-pro was not considered when weeping angles were invented.

>>31451473
Angels exist outside of linear time
If the film is ever watched then they're trapped, until somebody stops observing the film.

>>31451493
You're saying they wouldn't trapped at the moment of recording?

>>31451531
No, when you record a weeping angel they duplicate inside the recording, it's generally a bad idea to record them.

>>31441869
Their made from stone, the series shows this fact fairly often.

Rain, Acid, Bullets, Take your pick.

It's known that it takes time for them to reproduce through photos, paintings, memories and whatever. They can only reproduce within someone's organic memory (aka the person's mentally remembered image of an angel), if the person makes eye contact with the angle through the screen. They also are able to teleport through screens of themselves being displayed in real time, provided no one is watching the screen.

None of this forbids the concept of keeping them locked via go-pro cameras that record to solid state memory. An angle could theoretically gestate with the memory, but it would take time. The original angle would be locked by the recording go-pro, and could not escape via any screen of the recording because there is none. So long as one regularly deletes the memory of the go-pro SD cards, or better yet destroys and replaces them, that person has a viable defense against weeping angles.

>>31451718
Sorry, I meant to reply to you with >>31451842