.

>most units pictured are actually just POGs who get deployed to urban sectors and don't help in the fighting at all

Is Wargame actually any good? I was meaning to get it at some point because it looked a bit like WiC, but the orbital camera so your units are single-pixel sized kind of throws me off.

File: 1458781750458.jpg (14KB, 451x330px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 451x330px

Post deck ideas.

>scandinavian airborne
>eastern european pre '80s motorized
>dutch-german armored

File: haganai.png (819KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

819KB, 1280x800px

>>31379316
Pre 1980 Australian Armored.

>>31379296
You can zoom in to ground level.

You just typically won't because shit is hitting the fan at lightning speed.

File: whispering japanese cartoon girls.png (750KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 1280x800px

>>31379316
Pre 1980 Czechslovakian support.

File: SASR.png (116KB, 360x184px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 360x184px

> forgot the most operator

Tech support for MI, so no. Far from it.

File: ohno.png (251KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1280x800px

>>31379316
Bronze age phoenician spear throwers.

File: 1464553921669.png (51KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1280x800px

>>31379316
Early Cambrian Trylobites Shelled

File: images (17).png (99KB, 1280x800px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1280x800px

>>31379316
Cosmic dust age White dwars Neutrons

>>31379296
You can zoom in close enough to visually inspect the uniforms on the individual infantrymen, but considering how fast things can go completely to shit if you're not paying attention, most of the time they'll just be unit markers.

I really do suggest the game though, I've had a lot of fun with it. Heck I used to be a driving force behind regular /k/ wargame threads back when Red Dragon was new.

>>31379366
Eight squads of these guys and four squads of SAS have won me some pretty audacious victories, they're damn tough.

File: 3408434802767.jpg (155KB, 1280x671px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 1280x671px

>>31379264
Best Operators coming through HATO fags btfo

File: noradtonk1.0.png (2MB, 1306x863px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1306x863px

>>31379316
NORAD armored.

File: Wargame inf.webm (3MB, 856x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 856x480px

>>31379708
Where the fuck are the TH-495s for your Canadian rifles?

>>31379748
While 495's are good I personally like a card of 15pt line infantry.

>>31379708
>3 cards of planes
>Leopard C1s when M1s exist
>Eryx teams when you have tanks.
>unarmored CV
>Naval
>Rangers in shit trucks and not heli borne for sneaky ops and fast recon
>shitty 10 pt recon truck instead of coyote.

2/10 would not play with

File: 1442668015_ВП1.png (492KB, 900x366px) Image search: [Google]

492KB, 900x366px

>>31379776
You gotta spam the 25 point shit, its the best NATO spam unit in the game. REDFOR gets the BMP-1 spam so you gotta counter it wit the TH, amazing autocannon

>>31379825
>redfor gets BMP-1 spam
>current meta is BMP-3 spam

okay

File: 20160916095433_1.jpg (474KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 1920x1080px

>>31379316
Nam deck

>>31379839
35/35 points please explain

>>31379898
Thats Airland Battle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCTjoo_fCTU

>>31379704
SAS is better. Better gear and faster choppers.

Not that any of those are actually bad, they're not the best though.

File: 1459280718978.jpg (100KB, 680x583px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 680x583px

>>31379704
vatniks

>>31379792
0/10 review.

How to spot a noob
>uses grizzly over bison

File: gitgud2.jpg (354KB, 1291x846px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1291x846px

>>31379977
git gud


NORAD Armor is so bad compared Burgers on their own.
Cannucks don't add a lot for the decreased availability and activation points for the deck.

NORAD Motor however is great.

>>31380045
You get more availability in grizzlies.

File: 1407222926012.png (161KB, 381x338px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 381x338px

>>31379342
>not pre-1980 British Marines
Step it up, senpai.

File: 20160918220855_1.jpg (237KB, 1366x768px) Image search: [Google]

237KB, 1366x768px

rate

>>31379838

BMP-3 spam is not meta at all. The most meta spam is mot shutzen 75 in BMP-1 SP1.

I'm doing com for mech, but what's a good OPFOR mech?

File: NSWP mech deck.png (1MB, 1295x850px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1295x850px

>>31380296
NSWP mech is super meta.

Here's the deck I'm using

>>31380512
I always use to that faction. They seemed to have the best out of the rest if I weren't going fo USSR.

File: i have no idea what i'm doing.jpg (217KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 1280x720px

Any ideas on how to make this NORAD deck less shitty?

Ok....
Let's get rid of what you don't need first.
90% of the games, 300 points are better spent on most things that are not two Atachms. Get rid of those two.
Also you don't need an apache when you're running two longbows.
And choose only one tank between the Leopard C2 Mexas and the MBT-70 because they all fullfill more or less the same role.
Now the first thing you do is to add Muhreens '90 to the infantry tab just because.
On the support tab, have yourself a AAA of your choice. I like Centurion Marskman and Chieftan Marskman the most.
On the tank deck you should add the M8 AGS just because.
On the helicopter tab, you'll add the 45 point Cobra.
If I were you I'd change the F-16s for a 170 point F-15 and the Raven for a F-117 but that's just me.
Protip: F-117 can work as anti-radar. If you know where the enemy is the bombs will hit them before the missiles reach your ECMless plane...

>>31380823
>2 ATACMS
REEEEEEEEEEEEEE
also take a more armored CV

>>31381079
>>31380961
Yeah, I figured that I could use the ATACMS as some manner of counter-battery platform after a few games' worth of getting wrecked by arty surrounded by really good AA. That didn't turn out to be as effective as I'd hoped.

>Armored CV
Is the armor that important? Shouldn't my CVs be kept far, far away from actual combat anyway? Still new to the game, so I'm not sure how often my CVs will come under attack once I get the hang of things.

Wait, people still play wargame? Shit I've been playing squad for the past month and I've got an itch for wargame again

>>31381138
Having a mortar take out you're Humvee CV is retard
Either take the APC or TACOM or CV Inf of your choosing
Plus US a shit go with Blue Dragons

>>31379708
>no super m60

It's literally the best budget tank in the game, using them as defense is amazing.

File: Norad General.png (1MB, 1290x849px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1290x849px

>>31380823

>>31381243
>Norad deck
>no Chimera

but why

>>31381243

Goddamn, you're a piece of shit.

>>31380105
>delta farce
>avengers
>cavalry scouts
>rookie wild weasels

but why?

File: airsoft.jpg (43KB, 564x730px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 564x730px

How is wargame:rd gameplay wise? is it comparable to the other two games?

>>31381243
>No FOB
>That many command units
>That few supply vehicles
>No Chimeras
I don't understand.

>>31381138
>>31381185
>armored CV
To be honest it's a waste of time unless you're using your CV as a part of an offensive.
Often times experienced players will put T80K or Leopard 2 CVs which are very well armored and cost *a lot* in the frontline as to bait the enemy. Another strategy is to use it as a part of an offensive, as I was speaking. You get a large column of heavy tanks push towards a spawn zone. It's very easy to just mortar a CV that just arrived at the edge of the zone and destroy it, or kill it with an autocannon. That's not the same however with an armored CV, which would require very heavy armor, ATGMs or air power to be knocked out.

>>31381138
In matters of CV, you typically want the 100 point jeep.
Other kinds of CV:
>amphibious land vehicle
Used to cap sea zones in land/sea maps without the need to buy a giant warship.
>helicopter CV
heli rushes and the same as amphibious land vehicle but you can't hide it in the grass so its usually vulnerable.
>infantry CV
They're limited and slow on their own feet thus relying on transport but are the most resistant. I personally only use infantry CVs when I have two different kinds of CV in my deck.
>Freemantle
The blufor exclusive 100 point patrol vessel, courtesy of the Australian navy. it's the cheapest CV that is navy, usually effective in navy battles that you don't want to spend money on capping points.

>>31381196
Two Meme 60s = 1 Chimera and the M8 is even better. Muhreen decks are the only reason I see anyone running Meme 60s

>>31381481
Why do people run FOBs.
Everyone uses FOBs so I just steal their supplies instead.

>>31381672
Because the enemy team almost always has one guy who likes to zerg rush. My guys only have so much anti-tank ammo, anon.

File: 1432825904013.png (865KB, 935x645px) Image search: [Google]

865KB, 935x645px

>>31381758
>no as-90
>no planes
>no lynx 3
>4 line infantry
>shock troops at elite
>no chally 2
3/10 made me reply

>>31381758
>No aircraft outside of a recon helo

It's almost like you're trying to be stingy and turtle

>>31381758
this is bait

>>31381844
AS-90 doesn't work with my playstyle.
Planes are nice but they're flying win tokens.
Lynx isn't that spectacular.
Not sure what the problem is here
Understandable, but it was literally my only option.
Mechanized doesn't allow CH2.

>>31381846
Out of the times I've used aeroplanes and helicopters, they're easily taken down or they're pretty much a waste of deployment points sitting in a corner. They can effective but not with what I do.

>>31381880
It isn't.

>>31381912
Or more so, Commonwealth doesn't allow CH2*

File: 1472796567713.jpg (145KB, 500x774px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 500x774px

>>31379264
What cards would /k/FOR have?

>>31381912
It is bait, if it's not bait then you can't have enough of an IQ to learn how to read and write in English in which case we wouldn't be communicating. The moment I saw that I immediatly knew it was bait and I'm surprised that people still believe it it's not.

>>31381996
TRAPS '16

Mosin
Trash Cannons
LARP MG34s

Strength 15
Size Tiny
Stealth Poor
Speed Fast


>>31382024
Other people explained their issues. You just seem to be hitting your head against the wall like a child with ADHD. Calm down Kiddo.
Explain what's wrong.

>>31381996
>Nuggeteers
>Vinning '90, strength 1 100% accuray Elite SF
>Supergavin transports
>All helo transport replaced by gliders
>Air tab only A10s and F14s
>USS Iowa in Naval Tab

>>31382052
>two CVs
>repeated canadian rifles
>repeated canadian rifles of the same year
>repeated canadian rifles in the same transport
>repeated diggers
>repeated diggers of the same year
>repeated diggers in the same transport
>commandos instead of commandos 90
>commandos in the same transport already used by all other infantries
>two SASR
>two SASR in the same chinook
>no SAS
>no gurkhas
>no royal muhreens
>no AA team
>no fire support team
>no AT team
>no engineer teams
>no anti plane AA
>repeated challengers I
>repeated cheftan Mk IIs
>no challenger 2
>no challenger 1 Mk 2
>no leopard C2 mexas
>no cavalry tank
>repeated Green Jacket
>repeated green jacket in the same transport
>very good optics recon heli when you have exceptional for almost the same price + rockets
>no SBS
>no recce
>repeated cougars
>repeated ASLAV-25s
>no helicopters
>no aircraft
>repeated STRBs
>berliet exocets instead of sea busters

It's like David and Goliath all over again.

File: reference.jpg (267KB, 1318x762px) Image search: [Google]

267KB, 1318x762px

>>31382127
Also here's mine just in case.
I just noticed I run 120 point Chally while also Chimera when I should run the 145 point Chally.

>>31382127
Goodpoint
6 x What's the problem here?
I don't think you've ever used commonwealth or multiple nation decks or things along the lines of mechanized.
2x Look above
I was going to earlier, and see the perks. But from what I've heard SASR stands out as a useful unit and has a MG while SAS only has a AA.
2x Mentioned the problem earlier
3x They're mostly useless compared to vehicles, and come in limited numbers.
Mentioned the problem earlier.
2x don't see the problem.
There's a mexas, added it after I posted actually. Just created the deck now.
I'm assuming you're sugguesting this as you can throw it out to fight and charge but I'm not intending this kind of gameplay.
Only good recon inf, and only vehicle availaible.
No, with this deck type I only have the gazelle unarmed.
Can't, not there.
Can't, not there.
>Repeated courgars and aslavs a problem
They're cheap and they're good in forests or against vehicles if placed strategically.
As I've said earlier, I don't value helicopters/planes, especially on BLUFOR. They ultimately act like flying +100 targets.
Not sure what the problem is here.
Genuinely interested, why is the sea buster better?

>>31382262
My mistake, recce is there. I think I'll work on ym deck and repost.

>>31382232
I'm the fella you replied to earlier, I had a few decks along the same you went for in the past. In most cases it just wasn't enough, and the enemies basically got high point feed.

I see you're going for an over ability but like, I'm going for more of a balanced mechanized alternative with heavy firepower and pushing ability while it also has backing from the behind. I've also got the mechanzied limit. You were using commonwealth like me so, I guess the only difference was one of the types. No wonder you thought my deck was odd.

>>31381481
I play conquest, hunting CV's is really important, and you go through a large number of CV's in one game.

>>31381356
Deltas are heavy infantry basically, this was a different style i normally did with mass rifleman and sappers.

Avengers have 70% accuracy, they function instead of a card of infantry IRAA.

Cav Scouts are cheap and cost effective with the Dragon.

Rookie Wild Weasels will vet up with one to two kills. They function similar to PUFFs, but with better stats. They double as anti helicopter rushes. Plus, this 100 pt plane can kill the 150 pt KA-50 or any number of anti air batteries.

File: 20160919044555_1.jpg (446KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1920x1080px

>muhreens

File: image.jpg (650KB, 1192x1907px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 1192x1907px

>>31379264
No because I live in Australia, and you all know what that means

>>31380214
Looks fast and agile but puma helicopters are big and good targets for Igla missiles.

>>31381424
i have that top rifle
it is fucking retarded but so simple i could make a copy in my garage

>>31379264
what does the NSWP really add to the best germany ? please explain

File: 01236962696a66a5507105f18d0acb32.png (295KB, 450x624px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 450x624px

Israel OP

File: 1455921388.png (862KB, 1108x353px) Image search: [Google]

862KB, 1108x353px

>>31386446
Please tell me this is real.

File: 2016-09-19 11_55_23.jpg (636KB, 2203x1179px) Image search: [Google]

636KB, 2203x1179px

>>31386496
Yep.

File: Disturbing.jpg (52KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1280x720px

>>31386510
>RTS instead of NATO symbols

>>31386510
Just watched this too, great recon transporting great recon inf with 65% atgms got my sheckles

Are there any other new units coming out with the Israelis?

>>31379296

It's actually really comfy to play against an AI deck, spawn a bunch of shit and zoom in on the action while the two sides beat the snot out of each other.

You never actually do this in a real game since you can't control anything particularly well at this level of zoom but the game actually looks pretty great when zoomed in.

I am also guilty of zooming in on my planes when they airstrike while making pewpew noises as they release their payloads.

>>31386881
Don't think so but Yugo/Finns will come out before the end of this year.

>>31385701
Ondavas from the czechs
Prams
Better helis from the Poles
Kommandosi
Czech AGL-30 infantry
Czech BMP-2s with Konkurs-M
Polish Newas
Czechs give T-72MIMs which are great mid price tanks
Grom IRAA infantry
Czech Napalm Mig-29
Polish recon heli with ATGMs

>>31386881
Presumably not, but there's a chance they'll use some of the new models to rework existing units (using the Israeli F-15I Ra'am model to replace the F-15D for the US) and that they'll reroll some units already in the game (Chonma-ho IV to Chonma-ho 92). Wouldn't count on anything all new, though.

>>31386881
They streamed the Jew unveiling this morning.

>>31386446
This is one of the many units.

They also get Recon special forces with spike ATGMs, and the helicopter that carries them in has ATGMs.
They get several ATGM carriers, including that one that looks like a tank. It really carries 24 missiles that have 27AP. Highest in the game.

Their aircraft are OP too. Lots of good planes.

>>31381424

It is basically ALB

The big thing they added was naval, which while pretty to watch, isn't particularly fun to play.

>>31386446
>>31386496
>>31386510

Jesus christ, Finland/Yugo is gonna have to pull some shit out of their ass if they want to compete with this.

>>31386929
>They also get Recon special forces with spike ATGMs, and the helicopter that carries them in has ATGMs.

and if helo transports with the best ATGM in the game aren't your thing, these recon SFs can also come in recon transports.

File: F-15E_391st_USAF_081215-F-7823A-931.jpg (206KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 1024x683px

>>31386923
>using the Israeli F-15I Ra'am model to replace the F-15D for the US
It'd be nice to get a proper Strike Eagle finally.
>people point out the F-15E isn't actually one and looks more like a F-15D than anything
>Eugen just says well fuck it, I guess it is an F-15D then and leaves it like that for over two fucking years

>>31386957
They could always just make up units or give them prototypes or concepts from another country.

Like how the Danes have those Italian made Otomatics.

>>31379296
All units are modeled to (largely correct) detail. This includes munitions such as rockets, missiles and bombs. In fact, munitions (with the exception of bullets and gun shells) are all modeled and are true entities. Meaning they interact with everything. I've had a scenarion where an AShM was deceived by Chaff and ECM, shot upwards and then collided with a harrier, exploding the harrier because of it's fuckhuge warhead. Same happens with ATGM that burn out their engines and much more like it. Many cool details with LOS mechanics as well.

>>31387146

Also shot down planes can and will crash on units, destroying them.

>>31379316
Egypt/Syria for Redfor.

I wanna have a shitty re-enactment of the three day war against the AI and occasionally yell OY VEY when a Merkeva is taken out. Also I feel like i'd be able to recreate a

>>31386510
Anyone know where I can watch a replay of the stream?

>>31387497
The VOD is at https://www.twit___ch.tv/eugensystems/v/90235477

Delete the underscores.

>>31387561
thanks bb

>>31387146
>>31387195
Once BTFO'd some pubs after my teammates missile from his mig-31m missed and it went into the CV In on of their spawn zones.

There's a webm of it around here.

File: wg_mig-31.webm (3MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1280x720px

>>31387779

File: Wargame shit.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

My personal favorite US deck atm, performs fantastically in Conquest which is what i almost exclusively play.

I also have some favorite Redfor decks.

>>31388291


>ATACMS
>PATRIOT
>LONGBOW
>M1A2
>NIGHTHAWK
>F15D


Kill yourself. Most cancer deck i've ever seen.

>>31388333
Well, Blufor is the FOTM...

It's a shame, I love my Czech stuff, but it gets roflstomped by bullshit ATGM units.

>>31379296


it's kind of shit and the community is cancer, but if you are good you can do okay but its still shit

>>31388291
Only issue is lack of a decent cheap tank killer like the HMMVW TOW

That and a cheap amphibious recon vehicle. You could possibly replace the SEALS in the V-150 with a LAV

>>31388333
What's wrongbow with the Longbow?

>>31388511
too OP. But the fact that its fuckheug expensive and you only get two counters that. They're still amazing if you're not an idiot tho.

>>31388511

Are you serious

>Exceptional optics
>fires TWO fire-and-forget missiles with insane accuracy and AT values
>Outranges almost all anti-air weapons in game and due to optics and FF weapons it almost always wins versus anything that doesnt outrange it

It's basically attack helicopters for easy mode retard babbies

>>31380512
Thats a pretty gud deck.

>>31388623
>>31388511

But the main gripe i have with it, is it is SO OP that it makes it impossible to play many decks, since you have no way to counter them but MANPADS which are slow and vulnerable to anything.

File: wargame shit 2 USSR edition.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>31388333
I laughed pretty damn hard, here is my USSR deck.

>>31388643
>>31388623
Ah, I misunderstood. I thought that anon was saying the Longbow was a shitty unit.

>>31388643
>>31388623
Its not so hard to counter them, you can rape them with the 10 HE arty or the cluster arty, you can beat with with AA helis if they get ballsy.

>>31388746
You haven't played in a while, have you?

>>31382232
>Using lynx ah1 instead of ah7
WAKE ME UP INSIDE

>>31388756
I have, like within the month. People get lazy and you can snipe their longbows pretty easy.

>>31388756
Also Tung-m Missiles can take them down too, as long as you be sure to turn off your radar gun.

>>31388333
What if I added the Chimera and used Kiowas instead?

I need maximum cheese.

>>31388291
>no smaw in lvtp
Why are you doing this?

>Soviet-Korean Airborne deck
>Have over 230 helicopters
>Literally spam them with your buddies armored advance
It's just a matter of attrition. If you have a deck that can absorb blows while having competent support and forcing the enemy into a funnel, you can use your superior Vatnik Attack helicopter spam to make the salt flow.

Also why can no BLUFOR country do good helicopters but the US.

File: Wargame again.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>31388867
Actually let me show my Norad deck i built for a buddy of mine.

>>31388885
I like Smaws but it couldn't fit them into the deck so i built it without them, works fine and don't really miss them too much.

>>31388908
This is basically the deck I just built, except with the recon Bradley, the Kiowa instead of the longbow, and the 25 point Centurions.

I want to get better at this game but the ai are retarded, I'm too shit to 1v1 even a child and no one will let me fill the 10th spot in their big brawls.

God damn life is suffering.

>>31388951
Find a guy who you like who plays the game often enough and ask him for tips and help, i have been playing Wargame with friends since European Escalation so i know what im doing.

>>31388706
Scrub who's thinking of picking this up here, what exactly do the Su-25T and Il-102 do that makes them worth as much/more than an Su-27?

>>31387848

hahahahahahahhahaha

>>31388951
Same here. I'm a shitter at MP and I even manage to get fucked by the AI sometimes.

File: wargame.jpg (389KB, 986x1233px) Image search: [Google]

389KB, 986x1233px

>>31388999
Su-25T is decent because of its large payload and its gun getting buffed you need to remember to use it when enemy AA is either lost a lot of its numbers or down entirely, however it can potentially knock out 4 M1A2 Abrams in two passes as i have seen it do.

As for the Il-102 its more about its armor and it has a heavy payload, the aircraft used to blow dicks but after the HE buff it can rape face and it got its dropping area increased so its not localized in one spot. I works for me but i lack SEAD which i am usually covered by having a friend who uses it while i don't.

>>31389026
Frankly the Ai won't do much for you to improve, best thing you can do is get a buddy to play with or even get people who are well versed in the game already and have them give you some tips and advice on what to do.

The Ai cheats and is largely retarded.

>>31379704
I fucking love these.

File: airborne USSR.png (188KB, 1190x336px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1190x336px

>>31389060

>>31388623
>literally best attack helicopter in the world
>F-FUCKING EUGEN NERF PLS

git gud fag.

File: 1465186451939.jpg (3MB, 2208x2398px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2208x2398px

>>31389078

File: Dangerously Cheesy.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

Gonna post more decks i made

>>31379264
I wanted a Wargame set in modern times but then I realized it would basically be the exact same thing

>>31389135
I want a Wargame set in the grim darkness of the far future.

File: not much i can think of to call this.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>31389135
>laser weapon prototypes for the US
>Same thing
Not really fair to make a modern Wargame at the moment.

File: k.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

Last deck i am putting up for a bit.

File: I am Painis Cupcake.gif (608KB, 356x200px) Image search: [Google]

608KB, 356x200px

>>31389135
>scrubs throwing their 300 point F-22s/F-35s straight into fields of S-400s because hurr stelf

>>31389151
They could add some units, though.

>F-35
>very good stealth
>HE bombs
>Radar missiles
>very shitty cannon

>Commanche
>good stealth
>new ATGM missiles, more range but less AP power than hellfire
>powerful 20mm cannon

>Puma IFV
>OP 30mm cannon and 7 point front armor

>>31389181
>F-22 rapes everything in the air
Would be more op than the Rafael was on launch.

>>31389135
Sometimes I kind of wish for RD they had gone full alternate 90s and just given everyone what they might have fielded had the Cold War dragged on another decade. They still sort of ended up doing that, but in such a half-assed manner leading everyone to cry bias.

File: 1474061104680.jpg (128KB, 800x585px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 800x585px

>>31389192
Yes, please.
>a plane that can fire infrared, semi active and active radar missiles all at the same time
>with at least 4 of each
>60% ECM
>exceptional stealth

>>31389212
I like the prototype system personally, frankly the USSR dissolved in 1991 and the Kremlin of the USSR did evaluations and the sort about the first gulf war.. The game wouldn't be more different than it is right now.

>>31389135
I wish we had the act of aggression/war units in a wargame style game and had mod support.

Imagine dozens of crazy futuristic factions and hybrid forces of military/pmc/paramilitary/black ops units and an exploration of theater grade weapons.

File: Let off some steam Bennet.jpg (52KB, 802x242px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 802x242px

>>31379704

File: Man is no match for Sin.jpg (37KB, 803x183px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 803x183px

Quick reminder, this worst Korean transport is an infantry shredder.

>>31381243

pretty meta desu

I dont really like the v-150 20mm its kinda shitty, maybe take a cheaper armoured recce, or maybe the lav25 despite the bushmaster being meh

>>31381261
>>31381481
>Chimera
>Good
The Chimera is a balls to the wall retarded unit.

File: 1472787749815.gif (884KB, 500x312px) Image search: [Google]

884KB, 500x312px

http://plays.tv/video/57e0a710937192ae61/-wgg-

File: This kills the slav.jpg (568KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

568KB, 1920x1080px

>>31379708
>>31380105
>>31381243
>>31388908

Out of the way fags, real NORAD men make their decks like this.

File: 2uEety6.png (412KB, 682x623px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 682x623px

>>31393201
Not really impressed.

>>31393458
Maybe its because I'm not an arty spamming shitter like yourself.

File: blufor.png (983KB, 1154x737px) Image search: [Google]

983KB, 1154x737px

>>31393717
Ayy lmao, i hardly even use the arty in my decks.

>>31386957
How would Finland even work? They could only defend and would suck at offense

>>31388890
>SovKor
>230 helos

no matter how hard you try you'll never be one of those great heroes of the sky.

File: paytowin.png (2MB, 1290x728px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1290x728px

what the fuck where they thinking

>>31393201
>4/5 inf slots
>mediocre shock inf
>meh mid-range tanks, trained
>memebow, memely cfv
>no rocket helo
>memehawk, downvetted asf/memebolt

no.

this game is great but I can't get a match. ever single lobby is a stack with three 70% friends on one side, from 2v2 to 10v10 it's just stacked teams all day. none of my friends play it. so why even bother?

>>31396384
There are lobbies for noobs and you can also sneak your way into stacked teams in 10v10s or even 4v4s sometimes.
Just reset your stats and start doing that and you'll get 90% w/l ratio.

>>31396396
I guess so. I've been trapped in the average stats abyss since release. 44% WR, 700 games played. not new, just bad.

>>31396357
Gotta make sure blufor is not underpowered ;)
The blatant blufor bias in the game is ridiculous

>>31393201
shit tier deck.
Beatable by Poland by itself lmao

File: War_Games_General_3.png (3MB, 1218x1912px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1218x1912px

>she's dead and never coming back

File: grid.png (2MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1200px

>>31379264

File: images (7).jpg (17KB, 360x408px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 360x408px

>US-Israel alliance is a coalition

>>31396615
i hope you're kidding
US would do better with UK or ANZAC, Israel can hold its own, doesn't fucking need one

File: 1472217448489.jpg (48KB, 678x335px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 678x335px

>>31396357
>>31396403
Pact nations have helicopters that are better for transporting infantry for cheaper right now anyways. I can't see the speed of that helicopter, but I think it's just a seahawk.

It's true their guided missiles aren't as good, but you can't beat having both guided missiles and rocket pods.

What's bull shit is infantry in tanks. Pact should definitely be able to transport troops on the outside of their tanks too if that's the case.

>>31396643
You realize that you can remove a couple of the ammo racks in the rear of the Merkavas and fit infantry in there, right?

The Negev APC is literally a heigheted Merkava hull with no turret and the ammo racks replaced with seats.

>>31396643
>it's just a seahawk.
it's clearly a Sea Stallion, which is as fast as a Hind, and has fucking 70%acc+stabilised 22AP missiles, significantly more useful than even the currently broken Mi-17
>>31396643
>It's true their guided missiles aren't as good, but you can't beat having both guided missiles and rocket pods.
35%acc Fagots can't hit or penetrate shit, and only the broken Mi-17 rockets are "good", with the regular 2HE rockets of the Hinds being meh, though useful for brief stuns
>>31396643
>What's bull shit is infantry in tanks. Pact should definitely be able to transport troops on the outside of their tanks too if that's the case.
Yep. Infantry in tanks. Spec Ops in Good Optic transports. 600rpm (base value!) CQC Galil LMG on Elite SpecOps, unreal levels of frontal armour, 3km range MLCOS Spikes with like what, 22 or 24 ap? It's fucked. Israel can't just be nerfed - every other faction needs major rerolls and buffs because of this
just bizarre

>>31396615
This is bait.
Israel won't be in any coalitions.

File: baneblade.jpg (319KB, 1680x1289px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1680x1289px

>>31389150
Imagine the possibilites

tangentially related to WGRD: Type 58 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWLc50E-PBc

>>31396741
>Horus Heresy and 40k eras
>Primarchs with bodyguards and pimped out personal transports like Tormentor
>Melee combat, teleportation, jump packs, drop pods
>The chance to finally field all the crazy superheavies described in the fluff
>Motherfucking Titans
>A galaxy's worth of potential unit variety
>AdMech
>Orkz

Shame that Dawn of War 3 didn't turn out to be Dawn of Wargame.

>>31389150
I think a SupCom-like game would be better for 40k.

>>31398307
This, a bit less base buildy than supcom though. What we really need is a 40k game that embraces the Epic: 40,000 scale.

>>31398397
I mean, we've seen that Creative Assembly is willing to look at the Warhammer franchise, and wince Sega owns both them and Relic (IE: Total War) it's not out of the realm of possibility for us to see a large-scale 40k RTS in the semi-near future.

File: wargame3 2016-09-21 03-50-39-82.jpg (273KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1920x1080px

rate my meme deck

>>31398728
nice meme

>>31398728
>task force 141
you must be 18 to be on this website.

>>31398793
its a joke, anonski
i might drop the as1+ for another blane, maybe a cheaper asf