Pro-gun democrat calls out opponent's lies the /k/ way

>>31379068
damn son, I guess based politicians do exist

Hold up I thought this guy advocates for stronger gun control

File: I expect nothing and im still let down.png (774KB, 994x550px) Image search: [Google]

774KB, 994x550px

>I approve of background checks

NOPE opinion discarded; not a friend of ours

>>31379068
Wow he put an AR back together that wasn't even completely field stripped. Real impressed

File: 1465736369449.png (313KB, 401x547px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 401x547px

>>31379068
>background checks

NOPE NOPE NOPE

NOPE on the fuck out of there.

>>31379068
I respect him as a person but disagree with his stance on gun control. I'd probably enjoy a cookout at his house.

>>31379162
>RACIST
>INTERNET
>CARTOON
>MEME
>FROG

>>31379068

>I approve of background checks

Go fuck yourself, OP.
Then check rile 11.
It should explain why you're about to be banned.

>>31379170
>I'd probably enjoy a cookout at his house.

what kind of statement is this?

>>31379114

Jim "Smoke the slopes" Webb was pretty based for a Democrat too.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMJIPLjMTOw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLDLzgBdvUU

No, fuck off, the NRA is right. You can't budge one inch. See what happened in California.

>/k/ sperging out over background checks.
You need to understand which battles you can win, and which battles you cannot. There is a less than ZERO percent chance that BG checks get removed. It's even less likely than lifting the import ban or appealing the Hughes

>>31379134
>>31379162
but we already HAVE background checks, him saying that is an attempt to impress "muh universal chex" normies

>>31379181
An honest one. A kind of guy I could be ok hanging out with for 2-3 hours.

File: 1396800865009.png (112KB, 238x276px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 238x276px

>>31379068

>"I approve of background checks"
>"""""""""""pro-gun"""""""""""

wow look at me I can put a fully-assembled BCG into a fully-assembled upper and attach it onto a fully-assmbled lower BLINDFOLDED

This guy knows his business

>>31379068
>I approve of background checks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>/trash/

>>31379206
He measn "universal" background checks as in outlawed private sale

>>31379132
>>31379177
There's literally nothing wrong with stronger background checks if they're implemented properly. As long as they remain constitutional, they pretty much serve no purpose other than giving the gun-control fags a "win" and getting them off our backs for a while. Hell, it could be used in a compromise - "stronger background checks" for removing SBR's and suppressors from the NFA, for instance.

And even if he is pushing for more gun control, I'd rather have someone who understands guns doing that than an idiot like, say, Feinstein. At least the former can be reasoned with.

>>31379068
Damn... As someone who's going to vote for Blunt that's still a pretty strong message. I still ain't voting for someone who sides with communists and Jews, but still, strong message.

File: 1462214246201.jpg (41KB, 600x615px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 600x615px

>tfw really tempted to pursue a career in politics like my father
>tfw I'd probably lose any congressional race because someone would find my history of furry porn, /k/, /o/, pepe images, and more

>>31379245
Go fuck yourself, liberal.

>>31379248
>tfw I'd probably lose any congressional race because someone would find my history of furry porn, /k/, /o/, pepe images, and more
if anything I'd vote for you because of that. We need a few of us in office before we can get this country back on track

File: 1461693998634.gif (342KB, 250x188px) Image search: [Google]

342KB, 250x188px

>>31379245
>There's literally nothing wrong with stronger background checks if they're implemented properly.

>As long as they remain constitutional

>>31379245
We already have background checks, fuck off.

>>31379245
>nothing wrong with stronger background checks
except the part where interviewed criminals already said it doesnt effect them, and that the insane can get through everything you can think of by simply acting normal for an hour.

>>31379068
Fun fact: There are democrats who know things about guns and still want bad policies. There are also republicans who know nothing about guns and want good policies.

>We need BG checks

WE ALREADY FUCKING HAVE THESE

FELONS AND WIFE BEATERS CAN'T OWN GUNS

YOU CANNOT ENFORCE BG CHECKS ON PRIVATE SALES IT'S L I T E R A L L Y IMPOSSIBLE

I WILL SEE YOU FILTHY GUN GRABBING SCUM SWING FROM TREES SO HELP ME GOD

>white male
>democrat
?
does he know what year it is?

>Religion Judaism

oh my mistake, noone here should support him.

>>31379268
I know, but I can just imagine some far-left hacker to smear me with what I fap to at night.

Normies would see how Pepe and 4chan is """"connected"""" with Neo-Nazism and immediately be revolted. I'd love to run for office, it used to be my dream to do so. Nowadays the prospect of doing so frightens me.

>I was in the army(reserves)
>I deployed tomafghanistan (once)
>COMVOYCONVOYCONVOY
>I won't say it but I was Intel so I never touched my gun my whole career
>did I mention I'm army?
>I'll tell you this while doing a task any 18 year old in his 4th week of basic training can do: reassembling a gun designed in the late 50s that's Been field stripped into four basic parts
>army
>clearly my ARMY experience makes everything I say more valid
>army?

>>31379245
Perhaps you also agree with the veteran retards that believe military personnel/veterans should be the only ones to own guns. It doesn't matter how much you know about guns, what matters is your stance on the subject.

>>31379362
yea but he was doing it blind folded
And he's "reasonable" because he wants background checks, so terrorists can't get guns!

I literally just got my first AR a couple days ago and never touched one before that, and I could do that easily. Not impressed, libfucker

File: image_0.png (256KB, 547x422px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 547x422px

>>31379245
>Stronger background checks
Anyone with two brain cells can either pass or find someone to pass a background check. The irony and intent of background checks and waiting periods is to put a stumbling block in the way of normal law abiding citizens who don't autistically know all state and federal gun laws to avoid getting buttfucked.

Just today at my gun store
>Tyrone and co come in
>Tyrone 1 with CC permit wants $300 Taurus millennium
>All good to cash and carry because of our retarded state laws being superceded by government issued good boy CC permit
>Other associate asks whether his driver's license is his current address
>Stupidly admits it isn't and is his grandfathers
>Doesn't have new address on any government issued identification
>Cant buy gun because now that we know our FFL would be assraped if it came to light/Tyrone would be committing a felony by falsely putting his old information on the form
>Even though he's a card carrying "not a felon" who paid the state $140 for the privilege
>Mfw current address isn't even transmitted during the background check and all they ask for is place of birth, name, birthday, sex/race, and state residence/citizenship

As far as the liberals plan to keep niggers disarmed the system works perfectly. Needing state ID with address information and state residency paperwork is racis and specifically designed to restrict the rights of the poor lacking stable living environments.

File: image.jpg (55KB, 587x581px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 587x581px

>pro-gun
>democrat
Pick one. He advocates universal background checks. Youve been easily influenced by fucking lefty propaganda because
>ar-15
>muh military service

>>31379068
>I'm a nun but I work at a whore house.
Nope. Fuck Democrats and fuck Republicans.

>>31379313
>I WILL SEE YOU FILTHY GUN GRABBING SCUM SWING FROM TREES SO HELP ME GOD
Way to make the pro gun side look sane, sensible and reasonable.

thank you for your service

>>31379068

>"we need le background checks to make sure le turrists don't get guns ecks dee xd"

>get denied a gun purchase because the NSA had relayed to the FBI of me posting smug pepe's on a cantonese cartoon imageboard and accuse me of being a white supremacist
>no due process so nothing can be done

rights are rights are rights. If they can be taken away from you for arbitrary reasons, then you didn't have them to begin with. It's just like that "hate" crime bullshit: pure feelings, no thinking.

>>31379458
You forgot
>national gun database

I'd bet fienstien schlicks her old haggard cunt to the thought of all the shit she could do with that information

>>31379498
Inorite? now the world will think /k/ is a bunch of warmongering psychopaths

>>31379409
As a liberal, I kind of disliked that comment, because I've always seen "TERRORISTS!" as a strictly Republican tactic.

I've been seeing a lot of stuff like that. Punctuating sentences with "GOD BLESS AMERICA!" and talking about their faith. It really feels like I'm losing the party I grew up with to conservatives jumping off the sinking republican ship.

>>31379308
There's smart people and there's stupid people. Politicians are no different, they just have farther reaching consequences to their stupidly.

>>31379341
>Not following in the godemperors footsteps and owning that shit

"You're goddamn right" should be your answer to whether you were involved with the alt right and repeatedly posted "nazi frogs" to Hillary Clinton's Twitter account.

File: 1471761872854.jpg (53KB, 627x477px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 627x477px

I bet a lot of Israeli's can do that too. I don't care about their opinions either.

>Muh terrorists

Stop letting sandniggers into the country.

File: pvwHkLA.png (166KB, 523x407px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 523x407px

veteran here, i dont think alot of you irresponsible cunts should be armed in any way, shape or form

i also want it to be easier to collect a body count when the economy collapses so i pray to god they increase background checks and make it more difficult for you civilian right & left wing fucktards to get a hold of guns

i am firm support of veterans of the military owning guns and no one else

god bless america and good luck when it all falls apart

>>31379068

What a badass

>>31379658

thx for the cervix pfc jarhead

>>31379658
>100% guaranteed to not be a combat related MOS

I bet you were in the Navy or Airforce

>>31379459
>That pic
Top-tier video, fapped to it more than a couple of times

>>31379856

>responding to bait

never respond to bait

>>31379134
>>31379162
Can someone explain to me why background checks are a bad thing?

>>31380702
They create a record of who bought something. A stealth registry if you will.

That said, there are advantages. As a Canadian, I get guns and ammo shipped directly to my door, no FFL required.

>>31379068
No, this fucking faggot is calling for stronger gun control

Fuck off shill

>>31379245
by "stronger backgruond checks" he meant using the no fly list to prohibit gun ownership.

because SECRET list, with SECRET criteria for joining said list should TOTALLY be used to deprive someone of their constitutional rights...

>>31379245
get the fuck off this image board lib faggot

>>31379068
ARMEEEE

>Was actually just a pog-ass Intel Captain for the Nasty Girls

fuck off lib.

>>31379132
He does. He was against constitutional carry, wants no fly list no buy, thinks only cops should have scary guns, he is your usual gun controller but he is dressed in a uniform

>>31379458
That happened to me once after moving into a new place. I spent a hour at a nearby DMV and still picked up the gun by lunch time.

>>31379246
Dont. If blunt falls MO will have two demo in senate. Can't let that happen

>>31380702
because we already have them. its not about adding background checks, its more about stopping the private transfer of firearms, stop gun shows, and to disqualify more people from owning guns by taking a very liberal window on things like domestic abuse, drug use, or criminal records.

>>31379458
to be fair they do stop lone wolf no friend idiots from getting guns. No one wants to help a weirdo muzie or autistic school shooter get guns but your right that it doesn't impact your organized and typical crime.

>>31379341

I'd be more amused by the headlines 'local senator has secret human-animal fetish'.

File: loqbait.jpg (3KB, 160x160px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 160x160px

>>31379658

Why do people not know that background checks and big expensive licenses already exist?

>>31379498
Who cares what we look like to the enemy? As far as I'm concerned, they should fear us.

>>31381103
Because the anti gun crowd has been pushing that narrative for 20 years, with the pro gun crowd mostly remain quiet

>>31379541

Its because the democrats are taking over a bunch of republican talking points because the repubs with Trump have fallen off the deep end.

This election cycle has changed so much.

Its the democrats who are the party of unity, the republicans are at each others thoughts.

The democrats are the ones going 'murica!'. The repubs are in shock.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8O0uv4_ryas

Its why I think that, no matter who wins the presidency, the senate will go democrat.

>>31380863
And when Leroy comes to visit, you aren't legally allowed to do shit but let him take your shit while you flee to a safe space...

Maple scented pussies...

>>31379068
The problem with the bills attempting to introduce national law for background checks is the Dems keep trying to sneak in shit like "no more 30-06/.50 rifles," or "no more salt weapons" or "no more 30rd magazines" and similar horse-shit.

My state has background checks, and aside from like, one thing I disagree with, they're pretty fair and understandable to me.

The one thing I disagree with being
>oh haha, you got caught with weed? Nogunz 4 u
Kinda like how Cali recently passed the bill where
>you have medical mary jane card? Haha, nogunz 4 u
Take that away and/or add
>you're presctibed oxycontin? No guns 4 u
>you got charged with (any) drinking offense? No gunz 4 u
And one I don't remember seeing, so~
>oh, you're (partially OR completely) blind in both eyes? That's okay, here you go

Pot smokers are less violent and less prone to violence than pill poppers and booze drinkers. It's fucking dumb. Thank god I never got caught with the herb.

File: image.png (204KB, 750x3200px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 750x3200px

>>31380702
Pic related

File: 2345234532.png (304KB, 584x565px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 584x565px

>>31379068
>Disassembling a gun while blindfolded is hard to do
Nigga, if you can disassemble it with your eyes open, you can do it with a blindfold easily. Especially if it's a piss easy gun to take apart and put together like an AR.

>>31379865
I can't get over how fucked up her boob job was, I heard they pretty much had to take her nipples off and sow them back on.

>>31381149
are you delusional or just insane? what the fuck

>>31380702
SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

YOU FUCKING COMMUNIST

>>31381323
As much as I agree with this, we need to create an actual narrative and a legitimate argument as to why any form of gun control is wrong. Flinging shit will only make us seem like we're a bunch of crazies. Debate with rational.
If they act on their commie notions, THAT is when we fling shit.

File: Rockman.png (430KB, 378x464px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 378x464px

Just throwing what I think out there.

It is our right as law-abiding citizens to own firearms and ammunition, looking at it from a rudimentary standpoint. Following that, I would personally say that unless you are a felon, are obviously insane or otherwise challenged mentally in such a way that prevents proper firearms safety, or of course denied by the owner of the store for whatever reason, then you cannot purchase a firearm, accessory, or ammunition. If you are none of those, then you can purchase whatever firearm, ammunition type, or accessory you desire without a background check, and without a waiting period or delay of any sort, unless it is a store-related matter, of course.

I also understand that an unlawful or insane person could potentially have a sane, law-abiding citizen purchase a firearm for them. If this were the case, and something bad were to happen, then the fault would lie only in the person using the firearm (unlawful/insane citizen), and the person with awful judgement that supplied the firearm for whatever reason (sane, law-abiding citizen). Bad things will continue to happen, and bad people will continue to roam about, but background checks of any sort (An unnecessary breach of privacy and a hindrance regarding your right to make said purchases), nonsensical regulations/restrictions regarding firearms and all things related, and the registry of firearms and all things related will not cease that. It only weakens and criminalizes law-abiding citizens.

>>31381171

>my choice of drug should be perfectly fine, but fuck others who take their choice of drug

literally stop-liking-what-I-dont-like statism

>>31381150
It's a common misconception that you can't defend your home, even if it is with lethal force.
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/canada/self-defence-what-s-acceptable-under-canadian-law-1.1229180

>>31381336
> Debate with rational.

so a bunch of sandniggers shoot up a few places in the EU with illegal assault rifles and their response is to demand öegal semi-autos be banned?where is the reason and rational there? gun control has always and will always be irrational and unreasonable.

File: taking the bait again.jpg (36KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 500x501px

>>31381149
THAG YOU FOR CURRECTING DUH REGORD :DDD

File: 1469915327445.png (879KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

879KB, 800x800px

>>31379658
>I'm a glorified welfare queen.

File: 1470030733717.png (969KB, 897x684px) Image search: [Google]

969KB, 897x684px

>>31381302
>are you delusional or just insane?

In regards to what?

In regards to Republican talking points. The Dems grabbed a bunch from the republicans. In particular the "USA! USA! USA!, "American exceptionalism", "American values!" "Country #1, 'murica!"

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/conservatives-agree-dnc-was-disaster-for-gop

In regards to the republicans being at each others necks? Do you really think the republican business establishment, the religious conservatives, and the libertarian-republicans really are that much into Trump?

What with Ron Paul saying people should vote libertarian party. Ted Cruz and certain others not endorsing Trump and such. While the democrats have been particularly co-operative as of late.

Just you wait, as week as Hillery is as a presidential candidate, she might still win. But I'm certain the Senate will go blue, even with a president Trump. And what it is coming down to is that while Trump may be the stronger candidate, the Democrats are overall the stronger party in this election cycle, mostly because of Trump himself.

>>31381370
Fuck off, he's right.

It's legal where it's legal, and the liberals are only using it as a "No guns for anyone" backdoor bullshit measure because they clearly use state's rights when it's convenient. Demonstrably, there are probably more crimes "caused" by alcohol or anything aside from criminals and dealers doing criminal shit, and it's demonstrably more addictive and worse for you. Either they're just doing it for bullshit or they need to add the rest, that's his point.

I swear to God, you people are just as bad as the "DUDE WEED" faggots about it sometimes.

>>31380702
privilege cards.

and allowing the american government to decide who may or may not own firearms is wrong.

File: Smuggy TayTay.jpg (49KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 640x640px

>>31379068
>2016
>democrat

>>31379068
OP trying to sell us rebranded gun control.

fuck straight the fuck outta here, faggot

>>31379068
>BG checks so terrorists cant get guns

Ah, maybe we should put all suspected terrorists on some kind of list that prevents them from passing a check. Then we can put all our political enemies on it.

>>31379245
>a ban on private sales and a state monopoly on transfers
>literally nothing wrong
You're going to have to explain this one to me. California pulled the whole "it's just a background check" shit too. Over 20 years they boiled the frog and now the state has universal handgun and longarm registration, precisely what we paranoid slippery slopers warned of.

File: Serving_Gods_Khorne_by_Mr_Culexus.jpg (640KB, 500x3327px) Image search: [Google]

640KB, 500x3327px

>This entire thread after just wanting to share an interesting video
I love how butthurt the alt-righters get.

>>31381474

But he is a DUDE WEED LMAO faggot. He wants to remove the rights of drug users except those that use marijuana because lol it cures cancer

>>31381669
I'm not even mad, just baffled at the number of people that don't know what a BATFE form 4473 is.
>we need better background checks
>"oh like this form here used for every gun purchase from a registered FFL?"
>that's fake you made it up!
Anti-gunners irk me more than wet socks.

>UTG sight
fucking dropped...

>>31379206
Dumbass. We are FOR background checks at gun stores and such.

I dont want to file paperwork, contact the ATF NICS system, and pay a fine to let my brother touch my glock at the range without becoming a felon.

>>31381558
But thats racist anon.

>>31380863
And I go on armslist and find AK-47's for sale, no ffl required.

>>31381669
>I love how butthurt the alt-righters get.
you should be butthurt to bitch niiga your rights are at stake to, but you probably don't care because you talk like a commie scumbag and you are probably a fucking weaboo

File: JasonKander-Share_c154-0-956-468_s885x516.jpg (27KB, 885x516px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 885x516px

Why are the cute ones always anti-gun?

File: 1453702629288.jpg (68KB, 599x547px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 599x547px

>>31381857
fag, heres your (you) don't spend it all in one place

implying putting together and AR blindfolded is hard

>>31379341
Just hit back at them for 'kinkshaming'

>>31381740
Do you you honestly think /k/ is filled with gun owners?

File: 1455513774933.jpg (141KB, 572x677px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 572x677px

Epic video OP, I'll now vote Hillary so she can put in place all that common sense gun control and background checks you and your fellow dems want. Kill yourself faggot.

File: 1443145114050.gif (3MB, 360x203px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 360x203px

>>31381730
I don't even need to ask if you're autistic.

i remember purchasing my first assault rifle at a gun show

the dude looked at a wad of 20s totaling to 1000$ and he disregarded looking at my state ID and was just like 'ok dude here you go'

i wish all gun stores were like that

>>31381926
There's at least one or two, possibly 3

>>31379068
>>31379134
>>31379162

Am I the only one here who supports the idea of background checks, atelast ones that work (because most don't, ask Sen. Kennedy).

Though I guess if terrorists couldnt get guns that'd mean I'd have less to shoot at.

>>31381256
Yea I'm pretty sure we got that level of reassembly and a functions check blindfolded down to 8 seconds while we were bullshitting around waiting for our NTC rotation to kick off. Not hard but it will seem cool to a nogunz civilian.

>>31381937
>Drumpf

File: 1471039851789.jpg (297KB, 1402x1080px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 1402x1080px

>>31382107
> being a cuck

>>31381106
Because it's not the fucking enemy you need to sway, you troglodyte. The people on the fence or in the middle are larger than both of the other sides combined. When you look normal and present your facts like a well-adjusted human being, you have a better chance of someone coming to your side instead of screaming "HANG THEM" in front of someone who can only see the surface of the ideology you're wading in waist-deep.

>pro gun democrat
literally no such thing
in the end they will always vote for some kind of gun control and use mental gymnastics to justify it to themselves

>>31381969
The thing that's already performed?

Secret: If you have no prior offenses (Your suicide strike is your first and only offense) You will pass any background check baring a direct tie to terrorists, which is even subjective.

A background check can only do so much, no matter how thorough. Enforcement of the laws we already have would turn up better results.

>>31379245
Background checks do nothing to reduce crime, they are failed bad laws.

Ideally we'd get rid of them, but that's going to take a long time to accomplish with advocacy.

I will not support more stringent background checks, because that would be doubling down on a bad law that inconveniences the citizenry for no safety benefit.

>>31382141
There are still some pro-gun Democrats, like Jim Webb.

They're just an incredibly small minority at this point.

>>31382179
Are there more pro-gun democrats or anti republicans?

File: 360_reagan_lede_0204.jpg (26KB, 360x235px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 360x235px

>>31382196
>anti republicans

>>31379245
Go find a dull knife in your mommies kitchen and cut your balls and dick off, be the emasculated liberal bitch boy you truly are at heart in the physical world. After that invite all the people you know who agree with that shit you just posted and have bleach and ammonia party in your basement.

>>31381256
He assembles it. Little bit harder.
I'm sure anyone who's at all taken handled an AR could do it, but it's still cool to see.

funny how he chose an ar-15 to do this with, because it's piss simple.

write him and tell him how much of a fucker he is...i am

get on this.

>>31382242
calm down hard ass

>>31379245
>As long as they remain constitutional
Issue #1
>in a compromise
Issue #2

I can agree with universal background checks ONLY if they are free and there is a way to do them yourself without needing a dealer, and it does not record what the check was for, only that it happened. When all that is in place, then I'll support it. Until then, fuck off.

>>31381470
None of my traditionally democrat neighbors have any signs out this year. One house that had a 3'x5' Obama Biden sign in 08 has a tiny little Gary Johnson sign this year. Most of the Republican houses have signs for local and state candidates. I'm seeing Trump signs in the yards of people who don't normally have signs out.

Lots of young people with MAGA hats.

I predict that everything stays pretty stalemated this fall, seems like everyone thinks that the problems are all caused by everybody except their guy.

Maybe low turnout makes something weird happen, but I bet most incumbents will win and a close Trump victory.

I just hope Gary gets 15%.

Not because I like him or his running mate, but because it'd be nice for the Ls to get major party status.

>>31379658
What is it with
>veterans
and not using capital letters or periods?

From Facebook to 4chan, it's like their time in the sandbox removed brain cells

>>31381854
>you should be butthurt to bitch niiga your rights are at stake to, but you probably don't care because you talk like a commie scumbag and you are probably a fucking weaboo
Case in point.

>>31382253
AR-15s are also scary and 'salt wepuns

File: Csp9OiNXEAAWO3q.jpg (66KB, 600x488px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 600x488px

>>31379068
>Pro-gun democrat

>>31379409
I can put a lot of things together blind folded, does that mean I'm qualified to be president?

File: 1454381905289.jpg (281KB, 912x684px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 912x684px

>>31382314
not an argument

File: 1471404203688.jpg (45KB, 749x458px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 749x458px

>>31382465
> not an argument

>Dat filename
I can repost pics too!
Am I cool now?

>>31379245
>if they're implemented properly

the problem with every gun control proposal in the US is that they aren't implemented properly and they are passed in bad faith.

File: 1470683285481.gif (159KB, 300x169px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 300x169px

>>31382896
>>31379068

However much I disagree with the guy's views, I'm pretty confident that someone who is familiar with firearms is at the very least far less likely to push for nonsensical bullshit like what went down in CA over the summer.

Measures that limit harmless features on firearms and criminalize law-abiding citizens while doing nothing to curb crime.

>>31382309
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burn_pit
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mefloquine#Neurologic_and_psychiatric

>>31380702
I'm okay with background check 2bh

>>31379132

He does, that's why he is just slightly less shittier than the other democrats who will pass gun control that only applies to you plebs.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2016/02/25/ex-calif-state-sen-leeland-yee-gun-control-champion-heading-to-prison-for-weapons-trafficking/

>>31382250
>Basically only 4 parts to put together
>Bolt is completely assembled already, buffer tube it already lined up so all he has to do is push down on it
It's really not all the impressive, it's pretty easy to tell which part is which and how they go together just with feel. Basically anyone could get this down a bit sloppy on their first try, perfectly after only a few (like 3 or 4) practice runs.

>>31382364
yes

>>31379459
>>31379865
>>31381297
Can I get a source on it?

>>31379245
Eh there is a reason for it anon.

Universal background checks means that if you can't perform them, you can't sell shit. So gun shows or just selling your gun to somebody because you want to get rid of it will become a chore. This is not bad by itself if the law provides alternative ways of performing them that aren't horribly inconvenient. I can't think of such alternatives but if you find a way then sure.

However the problem lies in the law itself. And it's not exactly intentional.

I'll give you this question - what crime, should make it impossible for you to EVER get a gun? How long should "temporary" bans for "lesser" crimes last?

It is a headache for legislator. You literally can't make honest law about background checks because of it, there will always be somebody who's been fucked up by you innocently.
>>31379341
If your only "evil" activity is done on 4chan and you're not using any cloud etc. you're probably safe. Posting on 4chan isn't something wrong by itself as well, you have(had?) Vin Diesel posting in /tg/ or Taylor Swift lurking somewhere so who the fuck cares about politician being here. You're not likely be presidential nominee(or do anything "big") in the next 10-20 years anyway so hacking isn't very dangerous for you.

>>31380702
Consider this

>I sold weed in high school when I was 16
>get caught
>tried as an adult
>whoops, looks like I'm not allowed to defend myself anymore

>>31379245
Send me links to reports that BGC stop criminals from being criminals

>>31381058
Sure stopped lanza amirite

It doesn't do jack shit you statist cuck.

>>31379245
Shall not be infringed. Go fuck off you Cuck.

>>31383971

>I'll give you this question - what crime, should make it impossible for you to EVER get a gun? How long should "temporary" bans for "lesser" crimes last?

I would assume any premeditated violence with a weapon.

>>31379068
Seems pretty Trump desu Trump doesn't want goatfuckers getting guns, he supports the no fly no buy, he'll MAGA.
If he's an economic protectionist he will also make sure the import ban stays in place or we get a 35% tax on commie imports, then he'll MAGA again because he sees that milsurp guns get purchased instead of domestic guns like Rock River and Colt, or Rock Island and Kimber, gotta keep them domestic production high fellow American!!!!!

>>31384215
How about a guy who has beaten somebody heavily? Is he safe with gun or is he too dangerous to have one?

At first I wanted to say about knife stabbings but I saw "weapon" so... yeah.

Then you have things like family abuse. Or very good one - drug dealing - drug dealers may be part of the organised crime world so you'd rather restrict them from it. On the other hand plenty of people who are just your average junkies get convicted for drug dealing because they've had some big amount of stuff.

How about repeated crimes?

As I've said, it's not that simple.

>>31382309
Vet here and combat stress reducing mental functions is a thing. Most of the time it recovers in a year or two especially when reading, problem solving, and critical thinking are involved with the daily routine. Unfortunately a lot of us go to video games, alcohol, and assorted stupid shit. At best it delays any recovery.

>/k/ is not bot for politics, unless you post democrats

Mods=fags

>>31379245
>everything is black and white
>people like this cant see when control gets out of hand and cant be stopped.
>still want control like a dog on a leash
wow

>>31384852
Implying we dont still have 50 pol bait threads and "omg gun bans feinstein obingo shillary" threads a day

File: 1455053620588.jpg (283KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

283KB, 1920x1080px

>one on hand I really really don't like Blunt
>on the other hand this faggot likes background checks

We also got fucking Billy Long running for house of representative.
Why does Missouri get stuck with the worst cuckservatives we can't get rid of? Term limit on congress when?

At least we're getting based Greitens for gov.

>>31379068
wtf I love democrats now

>>31381149
>+ 3 Shekels have been added to your account.

File: democrats_on_november_8.jpg (357KB, 1888x1227px) Image search: [Google]

357KB, 1888x1227px

>>31381149
>Democrats
>party of unity
ABLOOBLOOBLOO

>>31381470
You're nuts
Voter enthusiasm among republicans is the highest its been for decades

>The Dems grabbed a bunch from the republicans. In particular the "USA! USA! USA!, "American exceptionalism", "American values!" "Country #1, 'murica!"

This is not a good thing, just makes them look like more dishonest hypocritical pieces of shit, especially since they are running a corrupt criminal candidate, and supporting all sorts of anti-american groups like muslims or black lives matters.

The only reason it is "close" is because Hillary has HID all along, she can't hide all the way to the election.

All these polls are assuming 2012 turn out, when its not going to look like that at all.

>>31379068
Missouri resident here.

Never ever vote for demoshits. Even if they claim to be pro gun. They will always vote along the party line which is ANTI GUN.

If you care about gun rights VOTE REPUBLICAN.

>>31385167
>Voter enthusiasm among loud, fringe, extremist republicans is the highest its been for decades
FTFY

>>31385177
If you're voting democrat for literally any reason you deserve to be marched off into gas chambers. They have a fuck of a lot more problems than being anti-gun.

>>31385267
? More like among formerly apathetic and first time voters, and former democrats, and former independents

>>31385285
REASONABLE POLITICAL DISCOURSE

>>31385312
Yeah, no. When you've basically become the Klan's candidate you don't get to claim that.

>>31385336
Nothing wrong with being pro-white, fucking cuck

File: 1474069668596.png (450KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

450KB, 640x640px

>>31385336
>He believes the media nonsense about the Republicans being the KKK

>>31385336
>The Klan's candidate
How's the clorox tasting these days? Do you believe everything Hilldog's site says?

>>31379068
is putting a rifle back together blind folded supposed to be impressive

seems like something you could learn to do if you just sat down for a couple hours and practiced it

seems really simple preschool round peg round hole kind of thing

>>31385336
he says, as Hillary's mentor and an example she has set for herself is a highly ranked KKK member.

>>>/leftiepol/

>>31385370
Its an obvious attempt to get pro gunners to vote for a democrat.

>>31385336
What flavor is the Kool-Aid Hilldog's got ya drinkin'? Because it's gotta be some good shit to make you this fucking stupid.

>>31385343
>>31385344
>>31385353
>>31385371
>>31385394
Nothing like the truth to get the alt-right foaming at the mouth!

File: 1474293758133.jpg (854KB, 800x1236px) Image search: [Google]

854KB, 800x1236px

>>31385441

>>31385441
You might want to reset your autocorrect senpai, it's changing bait to truth.

>>31385448
>>31385454
Don't you have a rally to get to?

>>31379245
BGCs need to be more efficient, not "stronger".and records need to be transferred from state to state. The VA tech shooter should have been denied on a 4473 due to his mental health issues, but his records weren't transferred to Virginia.

>>31385502
>$0.10 have been deposited into your account
>Thank you for correcting the record

>>31385502
Don't you have a cartoon frog to fight a war against

>>31381209
That image is retarded.

>>31379162
>background checks for guns are evil!
>background checks for religion are fine though
Trump voters, everyone!

>>31384000
Maybe you shouldn't have broken the fucking law then.

>>31379134
This

>>31381297
what did they sow them with barley or wheat?

>>31385981
Corn

>>31384000
Well, scum shouldn't own a gun, there is nothing wrong with that.

>>31379245
>stronger background checks
what does that even mean?

do you want literally EVERYONE to have your medical records for your dysfunctional penis?

>oh, see here you seem to got a small dick, can't be selling to a licked dicked, might get testy

where does it end?

>>31379276
this

>>31379362
underrated post

>>31381058
They don't stop lone wolves because lone wolf violent criminals typically do not have a criminal record before their big crime.

Anyone who has a lengthy criminal record is associated with enough people to make a straw purchase happen.

>>31383751
http://www.luv2skeet.com /4036/stepmom-mia-khalifa-and-juliana-vega-fuck-and-blow-her-boyfriends-dick/

>>31380702
In the magical world of never leaving traces and honest government no.

>>31379658
4/10, made me reply

>>31380702
Paranoia.

>>31386730
Or they pull a Lanza and steal the gun from someone who can clear the check (in that case after murdering his own mother as she slept with the .22 she straw purchased for him).

>>31385794
Guns are inanimate objects, religions are ideologies that can breed dangerous views in people that could cause them to commit violence

>>31379068
>i'd like to see him do this
So what is the message? That you can't legislate areas you don't have personal experience and expertise in?

>>31379222
Let's see a 6-hour long commercial where he mills out an 80% lower and assembles that and an unbarrelled upper blindfolded upside down in a shark tank

>>31379068
>Dems lying about background checks again

File: 1473946374145.png (2KB, 239x258px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 239x258px

>>31379068
>tfw a background check didn't stop my younger brother from buying a hand gun on his 21st birthday after struggling with depression, anxiety, and manic episodes of rage through his whole life

Never been charged. Never been committed.

How do you background check that?

>>31383971
>This is not bad by itself if the law provides alternative ways of performing them that aren't horribly inconvenient. I can't think of such alternatives but if you find a way then sure.

Open the NICS to anyone who wants to use it. If I can go to a gunshow, fill out a form on a laptop, and get my background check back in five to ten minutes there is no reason why I shouldn't be able to do the same if I'm making a private sale.

>>31387086
>Open the NICS to anyone who wants to use it.
And now your potential future employer knows you have bipolar disorder.

>>31386995

>Do you want to buy a gun?
>Yes
>Denied

>>31379245
Not even an inch of ground, ever.

>>31385823
On one hand there's all this respect for DA LAW then on the other you'd be telling me the government should be able to decide who owns guns and who doesn't right? So you're for background checks and other guncontrol bullshit just because it's DA LAW right?

>>31385441
>alt right
So you came here last week after watching some news reports? Fuck off.

>>31387935
>being mad about people using the soft title you picked instead of KKK, Stormfronter, etc

>>31379132
He is, OP is shilling a shitter

File: 1474054710821.jpg (10KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 300x168px

>>31379341
Just change your surname to Cohen. Show the judge your 3% Jewish heritage in your 23 and me results and say you want to connect to your heritage. Management positions at fortune 500 companies and a near ironclad defense from strict media scrutiny will follow.

File: 1473723088826.jpg (72KB, 604x453px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 604x453px

>>31379245
You literally cannot make a stronger background check system without violating 2nd or 4th amendment rights even further.

Background checks make sense in other parts of the world, but in a country where it's estimated there are more firearms than people.....No, it does nothing to prevent criminals getting guns. Just a minor inconvenience.

File: 1470515848216.jpg (59KB, 544x468px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 544x468px

>>31379068
Missourifag here, there is no such thing as a "pro gun" democrat in this state, not one running for office. There were at some point, but now it's cucks who bow to the national party with the veneer of a fudd or St. Louis dindus who shouldn't have glocknades. On a side note the Republican running for governor is no better and is a cringe tier seal team operator. *Sigh*

>>31379068
>>>/pol/

>>31379302
if they can act normal for an hour for a specific purpose, i don't think they were insane desu.

File: Screen Shot 2016-06-27 at 2.58.27 AM.png (252KB, 474x492px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 474x492px

>>31379068
>Pro-gun democrat
>democrat
Into the trash it goes.

File: This+one+is+actually+particularly+amusing+considering+where+they+are+_5c72c535794f11858a6e0a89957f6fda.jpg (14KB, 311x326px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 311x326px

>>31382107

>>31379245
>There's literally nothing wrong with stronger background checks if they're implemented properly. As long as they remain constitutional, they pretty much serve no purpose other than giving the gun-control fags a "win" and getting them off our backs for a while. Hell, it could be used in a compromise - "stronger background checks" for removing SBR's and suppressors from the NFA, for instance.

I'd agree with you, except that it won't be a compromise, it'll be universal background checks get passed, and then they conveniently forget or write out all the pro gun shit.

>>31381106
>Who cares what we look like to the enemy?

When the enemy controls the media, and when perception is virtually reality, it makes no sense to put more fuel onto a fire that's already consumed 3 out of 4 of your limbs.

>>31379245
>>There's literally nothing wrong with stronger background checks if they're implemented properly.

Except the fact that if every background check is conducted for every gun sale you have a registry of all guns and you can round up and confiscate guns like Australia did, except they didn't have a registry.

If they did they would have confiscated 3 million. They only got 600,000. That's why they want "Universal Background Checks" i.e. a gun registry.

Fuck off.

>>31379658
>i am firm support of veterans of the military owning guns and no one else

You bring disgrace to the branch of the armed forces you served and the constitution you swore to protect. You are truly a welfare queen degenerate.

>>31379068
>I approve of background checks
Which are already in place, unless he's advocating for stricter control, in which case dropped like a rock.

>>31392004
Remember FOPA?
> No such rule or regulation prescribed [by the Attorney General] after the date of the enactment of the Firearms Owners Protection Act may require that records required to be maintained under this chapter or any portion of the contents of such records, be recorded at or transferred to a facility owned, managed, or controlled by the United States or any State or any political subdivision thereof, nor that any system of registration of firearms, firearms owners, or firearms transactions or disposition be established. Nothing in this section expands or restricts the Secretary's authority to inquire into the disposition of any firearm in the course of a criminal investigation.
Nevertheless, the ATF Firearms Tracing System (FTS) contains hundreds of millions of firearm tracing and registration records, and consists of several databases:

No I didn't think you did.

>>31382284

I think it should be a felony to create a registry of gun owners and if one is used to take guns from people the crime should be considered treason against the American people.

File: free the shit out of everything.png (2MB, 760x1024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 760x1024px

>>31384886
>based Greitens
Nigga what state are you living in? He's about as operator as Jesse Ventura..

>We also got fucking Billy Long running for house.

Jabba the Longhutt isn't that bad when it comes to the 2nd ammendment, though he does act like a Rino sometimes.

File: k gets OCD.png (2MB, 1106x5120px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1106x5120px

>>31379068

I completely agree.

I seriously think we need stronger, federal background checks (criminal, mental, monetary) to prevent the Tyrone's and Lanza's of the world from buying their future murder weapons. Look at pic fucking related if you don't believe that we to stop mental fucks from buying guns.

Also as a former-marine I think that getting a CC license is WAY too lax, you should have to demonstrate excellent marksmanship at multiple range tests and go through one of those tactical academies that show you how to take cover, fastdraw, etc, and maybe go through like a week or two long class covering everything. Untrained civilians with guns is a recipe for innocents getting shot (either themselves or others) and all the time, money, and background checks spent on this means that it weeds out the fuckups with a n***** killing complex that wants to play soldier on our streets in peacetime.

>>31394523
>Lanza's of the world from buying their future murder weapons
Reminder that with Lanza's mental health history he couldn't buy a gun anyways.

His mother got him, took him to another state, took him off his meds, let him stew in a blacked-out room with just the internet, and even straw bought him a .22.

Which he murdered her with, stole her AR-15, and went to Sandy Hook with.

Omar Mateen had several background checks and licenses/permits.

James Holmes was never put into the system, despite telling people who should have done something about it that he was obsessed with killing.

The systems are already there on the firearms side, the problem's that mental health care is basically decrepit now and nothing's getting reported to NICS like it should.

>>31379248
>tfw I'd probably lose any congressional race because someone would find my history of furry porn, /k/, /o/, pepe images, and more
This is me, except it would be any /h/ or /pol/ content that would get me. Fuck. Remember when we all had a semblance of privacy lads? Neither do I.

File: Beaker.jpg (27KB, 319x420px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 319x420px

>>31394706
>His mother got him, took him to another state, took him off his meds, let him stew in a blacked-out room with just the internet, and even straw bought him a .22.

File: You.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>31379658
Fuck it, I'll bite.

File: 1469069402946.jpg (80KB, 500x729px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x729px

>>31379268
Just pull a trump and shrug it off we need more people who are cowed by the left's bullying

Everyone in this thread should be banned

Fucking christ

>>31382300
>I just hope Gary gets 15%

Man, you and me both. I voted for him last time, and I'll vote for him this time. It's a damn shame no one I will ever like has a snowball's chance in hell.

>>31381035
>gun show loophole

>>31381297
theres 3 ways to do it actually
from below the breast

from the nipple, which does what you stated

from the armpit which leaves no scar near the breast

idk how much money she makes but given she uses her body to make money then she should have paid more for it.

>>31382300
>>31395074
Fuck Gary and his gun grabbing vp I'm voting for Darrell Castle.

>>31394706
>let him stew in a blacked-out room with just the internet
well shit
that's enough to make anyone a fucking pscyhopath

File: 1341713244731.gif (216KB, 180x180px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 180x180px

>>31396210
>Darrell Castle
>voting for a theocracy

>pro-gun
>democrat

My favorite meme

File: 1471494550154.gif (430KB, 500x538px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 500x538px

>>31396532
You got a problem with that?

>>31379245

Remove leftist.

>>31386905

This, they are more dangerous than any firearm could ever be.

>>31379068

>pro gun democrat

Does not compute.

>>31398539
>Nobody can have a personal platform that doesn't fit the party line!

>>31398539
>>31396544

>someone's politics don't agree with mine 100%, he must be a liberal

>>31379245
>compromising with liberals
>compromising with the 2nd amendment outside of the Supreme Court
>compromising on any amendment because Huffington Post called you tiny dicked and some progressive politicians held a slumber party at their office

>>31381171
>Pot smokers are less violent and less prone to violence than pill poppers and booze drinkers. I
pot smokers make shitty decisions just like pill poppers and booze drinkers. you might think your mind is being expanded but the rest of us are laughing at you.

pot smokers are just as big a problem as any other substance abuser.

>>31382955
>Measures that limit harmless features on firearms and criminalize law-abiding citizens while doing nothing to curb crime.

gosh! its almost as if it has nothing to do with safety or crime prevention!

>>31394523
laws only bother the law-abiding, kid.

what makes you think a wannabe jarhead washout like yourself should own a firearm? you're obviously mentally defective and bordering on pathology

File: 1473011495615.png (1MB, 1100x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1100x1200px

>ctrl+f
>Hegelian dialect
>no results

C'mon guys

>>31379245
>compromise

Giving you what you want while surrendering our rights is not a compromise.

That's the opposite of a compromise. It's a surrender.

>b-b-b-b-b-but we'll give you suppressors!

Those weren't yours to take to begin with, faggot. What about this topic is so complex for you people?

>hurr durr look at me I can reassemble an AR15 blindfolded, I was in the military I'm so special

>>31398595
>I listened intently to the D.A.R.E Officer

>>31381842
You will never find an actual AK-47 on armslist.

>>31379068
What happened to all the pro-gun Democrats? And why do they think running on a gun control platform will work?

>>31380977
what did you do?

>>31379068
ANY negotiation for gun rights needs to start at the beginning. Repeal EVERYTHING and start from there, then we can talk.

>>31379245
>than giving the gun-control fags a "win" and getting them off our backs
You poor fool. That's like feeding a stray dog so it will go away.

>>31398595
Regardless of your ill-informed opinions regarding the character of drug users there is no rationalization for denying cannabis users their right to bear arms. Cannabis raises inhibitions and makes people less prone to violence by its very method of action. Drunk people make dangerous decisions because their brains are hopped up on inhibitory neurotransmitters which makes the danger seem both more remote and less serious; cannabis has the opposite effect.

You can see this in the (few) studies done on driving while under the influence of cannabis; users drive slower and are more cautious compared to both drunk and sober people. Not that I would legalize stoned driving; it still impairs reaction time and short-term memory.

>>31379245
This.

I would trade background checks (stricter one than we have now) if they lifted all AWBs and removed the NFA.

DESU I would jump thru as many hoops as they wanted if it meant I could get to a point where I could build/buy anything I wanted without any permission slips (form 1s, form 4s, etc)

>>31398594
Why would you compromise inside the Supreme Court?

>>31379068
>shilling for universal background checks
>advocates for the terror nofly bans
>pro-gun
>democrat
i poop on u kid

File: 4897695356853896.jpg (757KB, 2000x1450px) Image search: [Google]

757KB, 2000x1450px

>>31379068
>background checks
SHALL

daily reminder that the background check is a good idea. i dont want criminals or other assholes with guns.

t. p2a democrat

>>31380863

that is technically correct, however, the FFL retains the 4473s and not the BATF.

the only person who knows you owns guns is the FFL.

>>31381171

this.

4473 needs to be changed in those states or get the marijuana question off the 4473

>have you used marijuana?
>yes because i have a prescription for it a state that has legal medical marijuana
>lol kek that sucks dude, no guns 4 u big guy but we can sell this rifle to an alcoholic who beats his wife and kids


tl;dr 4473 is FUCKED

>>31401347
>Hey Steve I can't buy a gun from the gunshop. Can you buy one for me
>Sure Bob
>Thanks Steve
so helpful