Vortex Razor HD Gen II 1-6 X 24

>>31363716
vortex stuff is p much gtg

>>31364068
Thank you.

>>31363716

25oz

File: IMG_8895.jpg (2MB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1333px

Fantastic optic, amazing optical quality, large eyebox, forgiving eye relief, and a bargain compared to similar optics. Only downside is the weight. They are insanely heavy, but worth it.

Go for it mane. I plan on buying one of these and also a 4.5-27 gen II. great optics.

How do Vortex compare to the Bushnell Elite Tactical line?

File: Bushnell Tac Elite 1-6.5x24 Ilum 6.5x.jpg (458KB, 1959x1102px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 1959x1102px

>>31364278

Forgot to attach my image.

Seems excessive amount of $ to pay for that low of a magnification, but maybe that's just me. I will say that I like the razor hd gen ii 4.5-27x56 that I have though.

>>31364201
thats like twice as heavy as my Trijicon Accupoint btw, 14 oz master race

File: PA ACCS 6x.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>31364304

You're paying for light transmission and clarity. I have 3 of pretty much the same style 1-6 optic but my Leopold is appreciably better than my Bushnell Elite Tactical which in turn is significantly better than my Primary Arms.

>>31363716
If you don't care about weight, pretty much the best price/performance on any intermediate optic for a carbine. Glass is very clear, and field of view is great. But it's heavy... in a fairly noticeable way. I find myself putting it on carbines a lot and then taking it off a lot, as the decrease in handling doesn't quite make it worth it for me (of course ymmv). If you want similar (slightly better actually) optical performance but don't want the weight, I recommend the Kahles K16i or Swaro z6i. Both will save about half a pound on the vortex.

>>31364356
Have you tried the vortex strike eagle?

File: 20140716_202153_9 (2).jpg (560KB, 2226x1383px) Image search: [Google]

560KB, 2226x1383px

>>31364588

Can't say I have.

>>31364319
Vortex razor line is all twice as heavy as it should be

>>31364703
>>31364232
I think it's due to them using steel internals for strength/longevity/reliability. Not an excuse, just an explanation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHzvI6zu7Mo

>>31364278

About the same. Or, close enough that I can't tell the difference.

>>31364304

The Razor 2 and Bushnell SMRS are the cheapest mid range 1-6x's you can buy. Luepolds and Burris all cost even more for similar quality glass, turret tracking, and reticles.

>>31363716

Where did you find a black version of the Razor, and what size Butler Creek covers did you use?

>>31363716

RIP IN PEACE SUPERSETCA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHzvI6zu7Mo

File: Primary-Arms-Platinum-Series-1-8X24mm-Riflescope-with-CQB-Reticle-picture.jpg-e1450141406575.jpg (52KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 640x640px

Another option
http://www.primaryarms.com/primary-arms-platinum-series-18x24mm-riflescope-with-patented-acss-556-545-308-reticle/p/pa1-8x24ffp-acss/

File: PA1-8X24FFP-AD-MIL_7.jpg (64KB, 2000x1334px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 2000x1334px

>>31365997
Also a mil reticle option as well