find a flaw

File: fa18_8.jpg (30KB, 546x224px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 546x224px

>>31360167
that one has two seats.

File: Screenshot_2016-09-17-00-55-15.png (293KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1080x1920px

All of this.

File: Screenshot_2016-09-17-00-59-20.png (264KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1080x1920px

>>31360330
It should look more like this.

>>31360167
>Tilted-outward extra-draggy wing hardpoints

>>31360167
>Not a jolly rogers F-14

Flown by inferior USN pilots instead of superior USAF pilots.

>>31360167
>Not the C model

>>31360167
mainly range but for the price they are equal to f16

>>31360390
What plane is this?

>>31361054
Su-33
>>31361011
>Less range, less payload, less BVR capability

>>31360427
I never understood why they did this.

>>31361161
It's because simulations during testing showed that weapons or fuel tanks ejected had a risk of flipping and flying back up into the fuselage. Tilting them outwards stabilised that at the expense of way more drag.

>>31361054
F/A-MAS

Canard and 2D thrust vectoring and it's superb

>>31360390
Tradeing a little speed for 2k more kilograms in payload seems a fair trade, to be honest.

>>31360390
believing what the Russians claim...
the Mig 25 was supposed to be a god jet but was basically junk with giant engines.