Is there any reason I shouldn't buy the CZ 805 Bren Carbine?

>>31193127
Last I heard it was a piece of shit

>>31193127

Not even 1/20th as good as the gun it's trying to clone.

>>31193130
>>31193140
Do either of you happen to own SCARs?

Just get an AR or an AK or a CZ 58

well the 806 fixes all the issues the 805 had so just wait for that.

File: image.jpg (68KB, 434x407px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 434x407px

>>31193127
Its heavy, antiquated, and its a CZ.

>>31193127
>Is there any reason I shouldn't buy the CZ 805 Bren Carbine?
The 806 BREN Mk2 exists?

>>31193176
Came here to post that.

Is it cheaper than the scar? That alone makes me want it.

>>31193200
Yea, and three times the weight. That alone should make you scoff at it.

>>31193145

That's irrelevant. Gen 1 805s were overweight and unreliable. Maybe they fixed it for gen 2.

SCAR looks better. Bolt lasts 200k rounds. Is there anything else to ask for?

>>31193216
gee its 21 pounds?

>>31193216
Is it like all metal or something

>>31193390

It was designed to have a plastic receiver like the G-36, but they ended up milling it out of aluminum with the same dimensions. The 806 was redesigned to use aluminum from the onset and unsurprisingly looks even more like a SCAR.

>>31193293
Yea, i think so. At lest it felt that way when i heald it.

>>31193390
I think its made of lead.

>>31193443
Does it come in 7.62?

>>31193127
because it has the ergonomics of a 2x4

File: r00b8hX.jpg (69KB, 640x427px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 640x427px

>>31193145
Sure thing buy a gun that was confirmed to be shit by the Czechs only to have the company release the improved variant in a few years/months

>>31193261
>
Seems like someone is trying to justify their purchase

File: 1470780336206.jpg (191KB, 1280x825px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1280x825px

>>31193216
Yeah 8.43 = 7.7*3

Turn your old trip back on Squid
You aren't fooling anyone