Arguments against universal background checks

The less power of a government over the actions of its citizens, the better.

You already need background checks to buy or sell in a store. "Universal background checks" is code for "no private sales or trades of guns EVER AGAIN because some nigger might shoot up a 7/11 some day." It's the exact opposite of rational or common sense.

>>31188307
because it would create a backdoor registry, and the government would then be able to come for your guns.

if you pose a constant threat to the well being of others due to criminality or mental illness you shouldn't be free to begin with.

Because this would be a heck of a lot easier than background checks.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/01/proposal-would-label-bullets-sold-illinois-serial-numbers

SHALL

NOT

I'm against universal checks. It won't stop Jamal from selling Tyrone his Hi point.

>>31188534
>http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/09/01/proposal-would-label-bullets-sold-illinois-serial-numbers

I'm fucking triggered. As a Californian it's only a matter of time until I have to deal with this shit and .22LR goes up to five bucks a round.

>>31188307
I don't have an issue with them in theory but the way they are written makes them overly cumbersome.
>hey want to try one of my guns? Lets go over to a gun shop, run a bgc for the transfer, go to range and shoot, back to gun shop for bgc to transfer it back to me

I would much rather NICS be open to the public for voluntary bgc on private sales. That will catch the same minuscule percentage of transfers to prohibited persons as the UBC's proposed by brady/everytown with none of the hassle and expense.

>>31188307

What's the benefit?

When felons buy guns now, it's from people willing to sell guns to felons - Jamal and his crew. Do you think Jamal is suddenly going to say "shit mang, can't sell ya de gat becausss you no can passs de check"