Explain to me how the Navy believes that the carrier strike groups will remain viable after the Supply-class is retired. Without fast combat support ships, there is no replenishment vessel in the fleet fast enough to actually keep up with and support a carrier strike group in combat. How are they going to fill this huge capability gap?
Two words, nanomachines, son.
Probably the same way they do it at the moment given that there are only three Supply class left and there are ten carrier strike groups.
>>31177282
They put up on desert islands and hunt seals and turtles.
>>31177282
Every Nimitz they retire is getting retrofitted into a giant supply ship to serve alongside a Ford class. Think of just how many more supplies they can carry with a carrier sized resupply ship.
>>31177282
>>31177486
That....actually sounds like a great idea.
>>31177486
Neato. According to?
>>31177549
It's such obvious bullshit that you should be ashamed to ask for a source
>replenishment general
>general
lovin this meme
>>31177689
I make all of my threads generals even if it doesn't make sense. It's my trademark.
>>31177537
You're right, that means it'll get rejected immediately.
>>31177549
t. Newport News Shipbuilding engineer
But really I'm just shitposting about the retrofit.