/k/ approved

>>31171760
>not the original
>Jericho isn't /k/ approved
>Luger isn't a full sized /k/ approved handgun

Someone needs to fix this...

>>31171924
Bleh.
I responded to the wrong post.

>>31171774
Can you remove the P226 from that list?

>>31171924
Luger isn't in current production, and is generally speaking a collectors item. Same goes for all milsurps.

>>31171867
>No Remington 700

>>31171924
>jericho
lol

>>31172006
ebic meme

Should probably add i didn't make any of these. These are just the three I've collected.

File: bGbS0.jpg (234KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 1200x800px

>>31172242
Only old Remington bolt actions are good, new ones are shit and don't deserve to be on that list

>>31171760
>1911s
>no para/para-ordnance

>>31171774
Where da Hi-Point at, mane?

>>31172273
why

what's wrong with them?

File: image.jpg (2MB, 3098x1911px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3098x1911px

I have one

>>31172351
Remington got bought by freedom group, who doesn't know what the fuck QC is. They're slowly starting to make guns you can trust to have at least basic functionality and not violently disassemble themselves.

>>31172537
So we can only trust steyr or ruger to make good bolties now?

>>31172565
Any pre-2008 Remington should be just fine. Also, you're forgetting CZ, Howa, TC, and Tikka.

Keltec SU-22 ain't horrible, but mine tends to have fairly regular FTEs

>>31171867
No Savage axis?

>>31171760
How is the West German Sig not on here?

>>31173238
Because West German Sigs fucking suck? I would take an early 00's Sig over a stuck in the 80's rust bucket Sig.
>b-but muh legendary internal extracter!!1
>they dun't make 'um like dey used 2

>>31172567
The 15-22 isn't that bad, it operates like a full-sized ar but fires the 22lr. I know it's not piece by piece like an ar but it definitely helps with timid shooters. But I do prefer a 10/22

>>31171760

/k/ approved is idiotic. /k/ doesn't agree on anything.

But if you're going to do this stupid shit, TISAS makes a very decent 1911 for the money. Better than RIA.

File: 18-Mossberg-MVP.jpg (82KB, 531x432px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 531x432px

>>31171867

>no Remington 700
>No Savage Axis and yet somehow two Rugers
>getting a Mossberg MVP in anything but .223

Disgusting.

/k/ approved wheelgun list?

Metal frame sub compact for concealed carry?

>>31173453
>Metal frame
Why tho.

>>31173453
maybe Walther PP?

>>31173464
I like it
>>31173861
Id prefere something in 9mm or 45

>>31173929
Sig p938

>>31175301
that's exactly what I would keep except the FNX 9

>>31173453
Sig P938 or CZ 2075 RAMI

File: my version.jpg (2MB, 2500x2267px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2500x2267px

most of these 9mm are poop

>>31175389
thinks glock > ppq
wew lad

>>31175389
I can guarantee you crossed off all of those for subjective reasons. All of the guns you crossed off have great track records and will perform admirably. Just because you don't like the ergonomics or aesthetics doesn't mean that someone else won't; that's why it's a list and not a single end-all suggestion.

>>31175389
What's wrong with the VP9

>>31171867
No howa or weatherby. Ya done goofed

File: 1466977655445.jpg (1MB, 3024x2800px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3024x2800px

>>31171760
I need the /k/ approved movies image that isn't this one, this one is kinda shit.

>>31173973
Are these good? Worth the price?

File: 1472104413052.jpg (731KB, 3678x3487px) Image search: [Google]

731KB, 3678x3487px

>>31175389
>Didn't cross off the HE Grenade 17

>>31173431
The the MVP is on there at all is proof it was compiled by imbeciles. The MVP is a 4x4 is a Raptor is a shit. Always has been, by design, regardless of what name they stamped on it.

>>31175389
go ahead and mark out the CZ 75b as well

anyone who didnt completely drink the kool ade knows they're trash

>>31175425
>All of the guns you crossed off have great track records and will perform admirably.
pffffft yeah ok bud

>>31175648
Great proof and rebuttal, 10/10

>>31175606
They're good guns, generally keep a good reputation. Triggers are good, they're very small and easy to conceal. Biggest complaint I've really only heard is that the sights can be too small for some, but that's a subjective thing. May tend to be a bit snappy on the recoil too but with a gun that small it's expected.

>>31175680
what was there to fucking rebuttal you didnt post any proof?

act like a faggot get treated like one baby.

File: 143212.png (133KB, 562x472px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 562x472px

>>31175389
LEAVE ME AND MY FNS ALONE!
>cheap
>awesome nigh sights *cough* Glock *cough*
>perfect trigger
>accurate as fuck
>reliable as fuck

>>31175628
?

>>31171867
this list could be much larger
one, tons of the poorfag guns, like the marlin x7 (my deer rifle for 5 years now, never had problems), savage axis, ruger american, etc. are all in the $300-$400 range, very similair, and all very accurate.

remington 700 isnt on there, which I know current production sucks, but it still deserves a spot, considering you stuck the model 70 in there.

further more, the marlin 30-30 needs to be there.

>>31172273
current production winchester is shit, old model 70s might be the greatest bolt guns of the 20th century.

>>31175709
There are literally thousands of happy owners if each and every gun crossed off in that pic who greatly enjoy their weapons and have gotten reliable use out of them; my claim is based in common majority knowledge, yours is not. How the fuck would all of those companies sell so many if they were shit? literally the only thing you could argue is ergos and aesthetics, and subjective qualities don't count, so sorry.

>inb4 squishygun
>inb4 hurr CZ finish quality
>inb4 beretta memes

When you're on the side of the majority, you can ask for proof. until then, I'd like to know exactly why you think all of those guns crossed off should not be on that list aside from your opinion

NO MOSIN?
>>31171867

File: 1472503296249.jpg (46KB, 536x536px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 536x536px

>>31175389
worth a chuckle.

These will always be biased pissing contests that help nobody. Why don't we just make charts for individual companies? I don't know much about Sigs but the owners seem to think half their line-up is immaculate and the rest is dogshit.

>>31175389
i dont even know where to begin. you mark all of this shit and compeletly miss the sig p320 and 2022.
I dont understand how you dont like the p30, but think the 2022 is in anyway aceptable.

or how you axe the the lionheart, but leave the 5900 series intact. do you not know what the lh9 is?

while we're talking about the 59 series, which you like, all metal da/sa guns with slide mounted controls, how do you mark out the berreta?

so, in short, kill yourself

>>31175598
Where the fuck is generation war

>>31175864

Sig makes the P22X series, and shit. Nothing else.

t. P220 & P229 owner

>>31175598
>Cold Mountain

The first quarter of the movie was near apocalyptic, but the rest of it is boring as fuck.

File: image.jpg (18KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 220x220px

>>31173357
Holy shit dude, West Germans are great.
Fuckin noguns

Can we make a new handgun chart?

>>31171774
I'm gonna be picking up a P320 soon, it feels so right in the hand.

File: image.jpg (1024KB, 2827x2864px) Image search: [Google]

1024KB, 2827x2864px

>>31175598

>>31177083
VP9 is a good gun

>>31175608
>>/v/

Anyone have the latest nogunz/ poorfag sheet?

>>31175902
>while we're talking about the 59 series, which you like, all metal da/sa guns with slide mounted controls

This is wrong.

File: 1472668251897.jpg (1MB, 2500x2267px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2500x2267px

Updated

>>31175816
Not the faggot who you were arguing with but I think all he was trying to do was use some instant bait, m8. Also thinking of getting a Lionheart LH9 off of GB if the price is right...if not a Jewricho or a Beretta 92 will be good as well.

Is there a /k/ approved book list?

>>31172567
Where does the .22 STG44 stand?

>>31175968

It's on there with the original title of Unsere Mutter, Unsere Vater.

File: 1453008510197.jpg (18KB, 626x624px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 626x624px

>>31175628

>>31178990
MAC pls leave.

>>31178190
This is just a list of different styles, not a tiered list... Does anyone have a /k/ approved list of .22's?

>>31179289
Friendship ended with VP9

Now GLOCK is my best friend

yooo the sig p320 looks sweet.

Any of you anons able to tell me personal experience and their opinion on it?

>>31179319
Everything else > Sig Mosquito > Phoenix > Brick and Sledgehammer

>>31180700
I heard about the Mosquito being a shit, but how about other .22 Sigs? Like the P250 or the 1911 models?

Opinions on the beretta 92fs?

9x19mm parabellum

A friend of mine is looking for a buyer and I'm looking for a fun but I'd rather know something about it, basic stuff is it reliable if maintained? how does it shoot? etc.

Also what would be a reasonable price to pay for it?

>>31171774
Are the Luger and C96 Red 9 considered full size?

>>31171867
>no mosin
>no mauser
Git out

>>31171774
What the hell? Where's the Kahr TP9?

>>31171760
Where's the /k/ approved .40 caliber handgun list?

File: yellow_page_pdf_btn.png (87KB, 288x219px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 288x219px

>>31179075
Phone books are pretty good bullet traps for handgun calibers

>>31182533
10mm auto or .40 s&w?

>>31182634
.40 S&W

>>31182071
Double stack mag fed guns only anon.

>>31182658
Nice b8

File: Nylon66.jpg (475KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

475KB, 2048x1365px

>>31172567
No Nylon 66?

>>31182036
I personally think the CZ 75 is everything the 92fs wishes it could be. Most people like the Beretta because it was used by the US. It's definitely reliable and a good gun. If I was buying another, I'd spend at most $650, probably around $400-550

>>31182658
>40 S&W
>ever
if you have to, just get a /k/ reccomended gun (like a CZ 75 or a USP or a Glock) in .40

>>31183079
I personally prefer my M9A1 over CZ's. The Beretta is better machined, and it fits my hand pretty well. It feels a lot more rugged and durable is well. The finish on Berettas are also leagues ahead of the painted on finish of most CZ's (old Italian Berettas need not apply).

I will say that I prefer my Hi Power over all of them though.

>>31171867
Is this a budget hunting rifle list? Because if it is the weatherby vanguard should replace the mvp.

>>31182847
The most inaccurate 22lr I've ever shot.

>>31183095
Its a bullet type you literal retard.

>>31176351
9mm needs to be re vamped a lot. Too many companies making fantastic plastic strikers. Ones no one seems to dispute are BHP, 92fs and g17, but other than that no one seems to be able to agree

File: morrissey-624-1399556035.jpg (131KB, 620x417px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 620x417px

>>31183219
>unironically liking meme calibers

Anyone want to make a list of CCW 9mm?

File: 1469799787271.png (186KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 400x399px

>>31183302
>tfw you unironically like 5.7x28mm

File: GERG2210FFT.jpg (35KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 600x400px

>>31182533
there was one but it was about 6 pistols and everyone gave up on it. HK, Sig, Ruger, Beretta, and CZ make the best .40s. The USP is probably the best given that it's designed for the .40 and not a 9mm with a new barrel and springs.

>>31180956
The 1911 is good, but I can't think of a good reason to get one. There are cheap clones if you want one as a training tool but as a dedicated .22 you want something specifically built for the round and action. That's why the Mosquitoes had so many jamming issues.

>>31182847
this

>>31175416
Not him but it's true

Anyone true /k/ has a definitive list for select fire assault rifles?

Sporting brands...may have their own list.

Any true /k/ has the same for real PDWs?

File: newfagbuy.jpg (4MB, 3900x5008px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3900x5008px

>>31171867
This list seems way too small

>>31183777
Shouldnt the M&P series belong on a .40 list? From my understanding it was designed from the group up as a .40 and the scaled down for 9mm

>>31187611
right, that was the sixth one I missed.

>>31182847
I have one of these! They're great!