What sort of strategy to they teach at military colleges? Are they given accounts of ancient conquerors as well as modern tactics and the like? What might be in an officers course reading list?
Picture unrelated
http://www.history.army.mil/html/books/105/105-1-1/CMH_Pub_105-5-1_2014.pdf
>>31112065
Why doesn't the US have any major rivers like Europe?
>>31112111
this. We have like, 2 cool rivers
>>31112103
>WWI
>Civil War
That is interesting, and not at all what I expected
>>31112141
Quite a few books that teach you to be critical of prematurely proclaiming victory and of supporting actions just because they're American.
>>31112111
>>31112116
Are you high? The US has the Mississippi/Missouri/Ohio which covers like half the entire country. Then you have the Colorado, the Rio Grande, and the Columbia which are all pretty neat rivers. None of the European rivers even compare to the Mississippi/Missouri/Ohio. The only rivers that even come close are the Danube and the Volga.
>>31112167
Don't forget dat Snake river bby
>>31112168
It's part of the Columbia complex so I didn't mention it by name. I went to Wazzu though so I have more than a passing familiarity with it. Clark Fork is also pretty neat,
SMC and Academies are just like any other liberal arts college only with uniforms and extra coursework that focuses more on building ethics and how a strategic mind should work. West point has a hard on for Clausewitz. Unless you're majoring in history you don't really study ancient conquerors that much unless on your free time. Besides that you learn small unit tactics so you're not a complete retard as an LT. You don't learn any modern how to run a battalion type shit until you're selected for LTC and command/staff schools.
>>31112182
Fun fact: That bridge is the only year-round no-permit BASE jumping bridge.