FAL: Unreliable?

>>31086775
>mud tests

lol nice one, really made me reconsider my choices

>>31086775

No
Any weapon can and will malfunction
It is the soldiers job to clean and maintain his weapon.
If your fucking rifle gets dropped in the mud
CLEAN IT OFF
M1 Garands got caked in mud and you cleaned it off before picking off another nazi or jap...

>>31086775
Here on 4chan reading the original non cuck made thread.

Why?

>>31086840
>>31086816
mad kids mad that their special snowflake batto waiful can't handle mud in the action like the superior AR platform

>>31088329
(You)

File: 10632839_10203550329551581_7067731076500442542_n.jpg (19KB, 540x378px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 540x378px

>>31086840
>>31090382
>>31086816
>>31086834

>>31090384
(You)

I don't trust any American made derivative weapon.

>>31086775
At least put bait on the hook faggot.

File: Long_Tan_Action_by_Bruce_Fletcher_(AWM_ART40758).png (591KB, 660x364px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 660x364px

Actual mud test > YouTube bullshit.

>>31086775
I won't deny that this makes me lean back toward the PTR-91 GI instead of a DSA Voyager. I wasn't rushing to get either though because I have more important things to spend my limited funds on right now.

>>31090404
>A battler where Australians are proud of losing just like galipoli

Pathetic really, ended up with our airmobile guys bailing out their sorry asses because they walked right into an ambush and got what they deserved.

Post a real battle like La Drang next time, because that is how you win a victory.

>>31090516
Terrible quality bait, Jimmy. Apply yourself.

>>31086775

Those mud tests are all subtle troll videos, you know.

File: 12361235123.jpg (22KB, 263x261px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 263x261px

>>31090408
>DSA Voyager

Why would you ever buy a fake FAL anon?

>>31086775
>Where were you
Except DSArms is shit, and even drunken monkey century builds on IMBEL or Hesse receivers that were slammed together during the clinton ban will outperform DSA on literally any occasion.