What battles have the Chinese won in the past 100 years?

>>31069744
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liaoshen_Campaign

The ones against Tibet.

Every single battle it fought, filthy Western dog.

File: image.png (10KB, 779x127px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 779x127px

>>31069780
Shut up, Han.

>>31069791
>Kills all the cranes

Why?...

>>31069780
>be han chinese
>proud to be han chinese
>decide to read up on history
>conquered by jin
>conquered by mongols
>conquered by manchurians
>btfo by a european powers

>>31069791
But the Chinese did not kill all the cranes.

Intoletrash.jpg

>>31069744
India 1962. Multiple battles in Korea. Lots of battles against the Japanese. A couple against Colonialists.

>>31069791
got a source other than a screenshot on a board for gay liars?

>>31069796

To prevent them from eating the seeds from crops.

During the "Great Leap Forward" they tried to centrally plan food production. When the amount of food produced was horrendous they blamed it on birds eating all the seeds. Turns out the birds were keeping the locust population in check. After they massacre the birds the locust population explodes and pretty soon you have tens of millions of dead chinamen.

>>31069791
I've heard like 3 versions of this story. One was about cranes, the second was about sparrows and the 3rd was... I don't remember.

AMERICAN MILITARY'S LONGEST RETREAT IN HISTORY


TO DATE

>>31069744
They fought against themselves and won

>>31069815
Cranes don't do a thing to the locust population.

>>31069800
To be fair, all of those invaders are now either poor goatfarmers or extinct.

>>31069791

Then how comes theres still cranes everywhere then ya fucking retard

>>31069856
>Cranes don't do a thing to the locust population.

I think it was sparrows, not sure why someone would think it was cranes.

>>31069868
>expecting anything factual about China on /k/

File: GTY_Tiananmen_Square_3_mar_140602_3x2_1600.jpg (270KB, 1600x1067px) Image search: [Google]

270KB, 1600x1067px

The Battle of Tienanmen Square.

>>31069791
>>31069796
>>31069806
>>31069812
>>31069815
>>31069819
>>31069856
>>31069868
>>31069872
>>31069875
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Pests_Campaign
They killed sparrows, not cranes.

>>31069800

Japan and Europe are still there.

File: 219528_1221179216_large[1].jpg (655KB, 1600x1226px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 1600x1226px

>>31069800

>conquered by Jin
>Jin gets assimilated into Chinese culture and becomes China, furthering the Chinese civilisation
>conquered by Mongols
>Mongols become assimilated by Chinese culture and transform from a conquering horde to a centralised beaurocracy with its capital in Beijing and adopting Chinese customs within one generation
>conquered by Manchu
>Manchus are assimilated and are now a small minority in China with a culture that only exists as a disneyworld tourist attraction for other Chinese on holidays to gawk at

File: Sihang Warehouse.png (85KB, 780x819px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 780x819px

>>31069744
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Sihang_Warehouse

>>31069880
Which is arguably more useful and less absurd than killing cranes.

But hey, always gotta make Chinese look stupid and horrible.

>>31069892
One is a shadow of its former self dying out faster than VCR and the other will be 25% muslim in a couple decades.

>>31069815
The "Great Leap Forward" is the deadliest thing that man has ever inflicted on fellow man, and it wasn't an act of war, genocide, or hate. It was, essentially, a bureaucratic error. God damn. Never trust governments.

File: god will punish us for this.jpg (18KB, 252x223px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 252x223px

>>31069880
nothing done under the Gay Leap Backwards can be blamed on 'lol retarded Chinese'

It was a standing policy of dictators like Mao and Stalin to literally kill anyone who disagreed with their retarded plans

the amount of anti-intellectualism that came out of the Cold War is fucking astounding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japhetic_theory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

>>31069895
>>31069892


>be Europe
>do not join the Greater Chinese collective and instead choose to stick to their ignorant savage ways, thinking its somehow better
>end up causing 2 world wars that turns all of Europe to rubble all within a century
>are now cuckholded multi cultural muslim infested weak hell holes and their civilisation will not survive at the end of this century

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S8pXJWVszNM

>be jap
>try to force their savage ways onto the rest of Asia
>try to work against and over throw China
>are now a dying country of hikkikimoris, salary men and old people
>probably just seeing the errors of their ways and going to join China soon enough

>>31069921

And China will still be a paper tiger by the time that happens.

>>31069932

China and Russias purge of academia is why their universities arent infected with liberals, sjws and cuckholds today.

We need to publically shame all those in education who go against the constitution.
Make them stand on the streets with signs around their necks detailing their crimes, and have people throw shit at them

>>31069946
t. toothless inbred banjo player

>>31069954

t.shemagh wearing gun hating Horsey-comic-on-facebook-sharing cuckhold conoisseur anal object afficinado enema bag cleaning nu-male

What the fuck are you doing here? Researching us for your CNN/Mother Jones/Jezebal/Gawker story on scary gun nuts with black assault rifles?

File: fook off pol.jpg (88KB, 900x652px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 900x652px

>>31069966
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_Y3mnj-8lA

>>31069938
A paper tiger is better than a paper kitten.

>>31069946

The SJW's are basically committing fiscal suicide.

A lot of them are going to become homeless throughout the next couple decades.

File: 697523[1].jpg (19KB, 244x305px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 244x305px

>>31069932
I think you are seriously misunderstanding how most people died in the Great Leap Forward.

>>31069993
But they can still vote

>>31069936

>Be Chinese
>Too overworked and lungs too filled with smog to do anything but nod to government propaganda
>When not assembling iPhones is shitposting on western websites
>Spend most of the free time masturbating and trying to purchase brides because one-child policy made women scarce
>Wife arrives by main and ends up running away back to her home country anyway
>Masturbate some more jacking off to the newest Chinese military knock offs stolen from American and Russian blueprints from the 80's
>Even stealing everything they could they can't produce a single radar or engine worth a damn and have to import from the British, French and Russians anyway
>Then goes to boast how the Chinese economy is the strongest ever from a 2 square meters apartment because too poor to afford one in the many empty ghost cities build to inflate the GPD
>Latter gets evicted because house is going to be flooded by new damn being built
>Never gets any sort of compensation and spend the rest of the week moving from computer parts dumps to scrap whatever metal is left on them
>Gets hungry sees dog and eats dog
>Gets lead poisoning because local butcher was feeding dog with pig leftovers fed from lead contaminated corn and water
>Has to go aunt's funeral but it is closed casket because she became ground beef thanks to shitty escalator
>Tries to go to the hospital later to treat the lead poisoned liver
>Wake up a day later with liver and both kidneys missing
>Have to kidnap a Uyghur teenager to replace stolen organs

Such is life in China

>>31070015

This is true.

Although, most of them will probably die before 45 of heart failure or other obesity related disease/disorder.

>>31070011
I'm saying if you were an smart Chinese guy who knew that sparrows ate insects that devour crops you didn't say shit about it because you didn't want to get executed for being a bourgeois philosopher

>>31069936
>Europeans
>Savage
That's an odd way of spelling superior, wang.

>>31069982
>Look how centrist and respectable my political views are haha.

>>31069932
No wonder liberalism is a mental illness

>>31069936
That YT's video title is moronic clickbait for delusional foreigners.
In the grand scheme of things, both world wars didn't have that much of a lasting effect compared to the 9th c. invasions or the Black Plague. Industrialization makes it very easy to catch up demographically and structurally. Our situation has more to do with capitalism dying and being in a phase of self-destruction.
And there's not really such a thing as *a* European civilization.

t. French, historian, happen to be part of a bunch of patrimony preservation societies.

>>31069744
China is winning the economic war being fought today. China is impressive in economic warfare, soon by taking over the African continent, China will be the biggest nation on earth.

>>31070403

Honestly, being China would be a step up for most of Africa.

That said, China wouldn't be the first to try and all the others ended in stupendous failures. Good luck, I guess?

File: 1471218075958.jpg (95KB, 413x412px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 413x412px

>>31069744
Multiple battles during Korean War

China isnt so much in winning battles, but winning wars.

In Chinese military philosophy, winning wars by strategic and political means is superior in gaining mere macho-points by winning field-battles.

>Korean War: China lost a lot of men, lost a lot of battles, but won a few important battles that held off the US advance to China, pushed them out of North Korea and saved their buffer-zone in the end. Political objective achieved. No need to cry about all the losses, as in the end, China has showed the US and the West that it cant be ignored and pushed over so easily as back in WWII.

>Vietnam Invasion: China is angry about Vietnam signing a mutual defense treaty with the USSR; fears encirclement of Vietnam in the South and USSR in the North, especially soviet naval presence in the South China Sea. China invades Vietnam shortly after the signing of the treaty, under great losses they push down to Hanoi and destroy much of the infrastructure alogn the way, salt their fields and raze their towns. Vietnam could hold China off with equally large losses, but the war of attrition is favoring China in the long run.
>The USSR stands down and does not act according to the Mutual Defense Treaty with Vietnam, and loses all credibility and trust in the eyes of the Vietnamese leadership. USSR loses Vietnam's favor, the South China Sea remains free from hostile and uninivited Russian naval presence to this day, enabling China to violently recapture several South China Sea islands and reefs during the 1988 naval war, sinking several Vietnamese warships. Vietnam's economy cant sustain the war with China for much longer and in 1990, after 10 years of border skirmishes, Vietnam sends envoys to China to normalize relations. China retreats from the occupied border regions in Vietnan to let them save face but maintains her territorial gains in the South China Sea that are useful for China today. Political objective achieved for China.

>>31070497
cont.

>Sino-Indian War of 1962: India completely shits on China's interests, considers China a pushover and salami-sclices along China's border-regions in Tibet. India is ensured of Western, especially British, support, and has high confidence about their Sandhurst-trained officers corps that should be able to completely BTFO the Chinks who can only do human wave and have low morale etc. (according to Indian opinion then). Additionally, China was wrecked by the Great Leap Forward just a few years before, and the Indians believed that the PLA would also be suffering from malnutrition and bad training/equipment. All these "Indian advantages" turned out to be elusive in reality.
>China completely BTFO India after issuing multiple high-level warnings, literally pushed the Indians down the Himalayan mountains, captured their Sandhurst-trained officers and british weapons in the process. The Indian offensive is completely beaten back, prompting Nehru to cry to Washington and London for military help, as he feared that the PLA would attack Dheli next.
>China returned said officers and weapons in best conditions, well-fed and cleaned, and unilaterally declares a cease-fire. China returns the territorial gains back to Indian hands and basically told the Poos that this ass-kick delivered against them was nothin personell, kid. This adds insult to injury to the indian military defeat that lasts to this day in the form of a national trauma. The "Forward Policy" of India is defeated and no new offensives and land-grabs were initiated by India. Instead, Chinese PLA soldiers regularily patrol "Indian" territory, causing butthurt to this day. Political objective achieved.

Strictly speaking, the Chinese did win the battle of the Chosin Resevoir.

>>31070643
They did. They achieved their objective.

It is the US who delt them a bigger than anticipated blow by destroying a division during their fighting retreat.
But that's not important, as in the end, they still retreated and left the North to the Communists, thereby satisfying China's entire goal-set of intervention.

File: pooinloocarbine.jpg (32KB, 560x315px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 560x315px

>>31070616
>beating India
>an accomplishment
India can't figure out how to use a toilet properly much less fight a war, they are lucky that their primary border dispute is with the equally incompetent Pakis

>>31069800
China has a pretty good record all things considered. The biggest takeaway from those events is that China needs domestic political stability to defend itself from foreign threats.

Aside from the Mongols, the Chinese could've handily defended themselves from the Manchus if they had the political willpower to do so.

>>31069744
>What battles have the Chinese won in the past 100 years?
Global economy

>>31071191
Can't think of a way to spin the missing stock

>>31071191
pls tell me it's a folding stock.

>>31071191

It's certainly better than losing to India.

Using your logic Israel is a joke because all they beat are lolarabs

>>31071235
Mongols also just won because the Song-Dynasty were inept and pacifist faggot who thought that Horseback nomads who were known for raping and slaughtering (or vice versa) everyone including their pets when they invade a city could be appeased and driven off by bribing them with silver-taels, trade-priviledges and courtisans.

Song were literally liberal cucks centuries before it became a thing in the West.

The "confucian" idea about anti-militarism and that "no good and respectable man should seek a profession as babaric as becoming a soldier, just as you wouldnt use your best iron to make nails out of them" is a Song-Dynasty invention.
All the technologies that could have been adapted for military use to BFTO the Mongols were spent in leisure toys for the Song-rulers, while the only Manly Badass General who actually was able and willing to fight was being backstabbed by corrupt pacifist officials who feared that his defensive campaigns would endanger their business interests with the horseback nomads, branded a traitor and executed.

>>31069911
>killing one bird and not another so there was widespread famine is less retarded because reasons

Are you fucking stupid?

>>31071330
Are you talking about Yue Fei? Most Asian societies don't value soldiering as a valid professional for nice young boys.

You'll notice that the only Asian societies that have valued soldiers are Imperial Japan and modern Communist China, nations that had/have high amounts of nationalism.

>>31071451

Viets, Thais, Nepalese, Indians, Malays all have pretty high opinion of warrior classes.

>>31071494
Okay, I should've clarified: most East Asian civilizations have never regarded soldiering as a noble profession.

>>31071510

Korea arguably promoted soldiering as a valid profession in the 16th century during the Japanese invasions

Japan's warrior culture has been pretty ingrained since the 15th century

Mongolia hardly needs an explanation

China admittedly hasn't but they seem to be in the minority here

I'm not quite sure what else qualifies as east asian.

>>31069744
Taking your jobs

>>31069830
Well, technically, the US retreat to Corregidor in the Phillipines was longer.

>>31069830
>used mass attacks combined with surprise and still failed to force out the capitalist pig-dogs while sustaining massive casualties.

"Hurr! But we pushed them back for a little while".

>>31069932
Gotta bury dem scholars an burn tha books. Had a Chinese professor, took years to get him to tell his story to us. He despised Mao and was one of the children that got "re-educated" in the mountains. Went back once to visit his family and his second cousin stole something, so they made him kneel on chains to testify he was in a different country.
So far they have successfully: Subjugated pacifists, turned North Korea into the worst dictatorship of the century, stolen massive amounts of the South China Sea, and won the battle against oral hygiene.

>>31071191

>equally incompetent pakis

India is like 5 times bigger than Paki, if Paki was the same size as India then India would be wiped out. India can't even capture Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir from Paki.