So what's the deal with these.
Are they as God tier as the 75-P01?
Do they look fuckin' god tier?
OP's picture made me realise something. Pistols are bullpups. Their ammo is loaded behind the trigger.
>>31056488
No. Not really. Not blocky enough.
>>31056507
>420blazeitfggt
>>31056507
Not gonna piss away my entire night arguing, but no. The action it self has to be behind the trigger. The only bullpup I can think of off the top of my head is the boberg xr9.
If you want to argue semantics or the minute details of how much of the action is in front, in line or behind you won't get that.
>>31056619
Noob here so I'm guessing that when the bullet is moved into the barrel it travels forward as well as up so everything happens above the trigger not behind it
>>31056484
>CZ 100
>anything but dogshit
My first pistol (because of GitS); .40
It's one of those things are are 99% awesome but with 1% badness that totally fucks that 99%
That 1% is the trigger pull. It's bad. No, seriously, it's very, very bad.
On the plus side, it can teach you to shoot well. If you can group the thing in the bull, then anything else will be easy.
I imagine they're a decent enough pistol considered the company they come from.
>>31056619
>They will never make a double stack, full size equivalent with a nearly 8 inch barrel and offer it in .357 SIG for muh velocities
>>31058045
Everything is good, except the trigger pull.
>>31058045
A company that doesn't even finish the inside of their steel frame guns? Yeah I'd expect it to be shit too.
>>31056507
Get raped or die trying.
>>31058103
Just CLP the internals and deal with it.