Coincidence?

>>30961757
No.

Nope.

Form follows function after all.

>>30961757
design study came to same conclusion MIG 31 built by guys built MIG 25, everybody got the idea, f-15 more aerodynamic but not as fast as the mig

>>30961757
One is an actual fighter, the other is not, can you guess which is which?

The F-15 was created as a response to what we thought the MiG-25 could do at the time. The similar form factor was intentional.

Shitty countries copy US technology all the time. Look at the rest of the world's fighters.

>>30961884

Both are fighters. However, the F-15 put more emphasis on maneuverability whereas the MiG-25 focused more on acceleration.

>>30963531
The MiG-25 came first. McDonnell Douglas explicitly copied the MiG-25's basic layout for the F-15. They never tried to hide that fact.

>>30963586
One is literally just an interceptor with almost no way of engaging an enemy fighter in a head on manner.

Can you guess which is which?

>>30961757
yes

>>30964862
Also, the MiG is a trainer.

>>30964991
like your mom

>>30963758
The Mig 25 is actually very maneuverable for a plane this big and this heavy. It's not a sitting duck.