Downsides and upsides of the X95

Upsides:
>it's short
Downsides
>lol 5moa

Well, it's extremely compact relative to its barrel size.

The ergonomics are good for a bullpup.

Other than that it's just a normal 5.56 semi-automatic rifle, on the extremely common AR-18 pattern.

He may be right, on paper at least. The mil version is more compact, has provisions for a suppressor and I hear they have different barrels that might not suffer the accuracy issues people bitch about on the civ ones. That said, unless hes a Jew in the IDF, hes probably talking out his ass.

AK in a bullpup kit produces a better rifle.

>>30745884
That looks a lot better than the regular Tavor, I would actually consider buying one.

>>30745945
how so? bullpup AKs are always without exception unergonomic pieces of shit.

File: 1413104379819.gif (1MB, 290x189px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 290x189px

>>30745884
>5 MOA
>Perfect weapon.

>>30745945
damn righ

>>30745884
>Upsides
Short
>Downsides
Shit accuracy.

>>30745895
>>30746040
>5 MOA

why is that? shitty barrel?

>>30746118
No actually, no ones figured it out yet.

It has the same barrel as the original tavor which shot 2moa

>>30745895
>>30746040
>>30746090
>>30746118
You niggers do realize it's meant to be a combat weapon for the juice, right? It's not designed to be a tack driver.

>>30746140
I agree with this. I think it's a good rifle. Just not as accurate as I personally want. I got 1moa out of a $99 PSA freedom barrel

>>30746140
5moa out of any rifle is a joke when factory AKs are being produced with <2moa.

>>30746140
see: >>30746128
The problem is less that it is that inaccurate and more that there's no reason it should be that inaccurate.

>>30746140
Shooting a FIVE INCH group at 100m is not conducive to combat, let alone anything firearm related. That is a huge and unacceptable margin of error, 2-3MOA is the bare minimum expectation and this garbage is only useful for throwing distance.

Couple that with a 2k pricetag and you've got a recipe for failure.

>>30746128
has it been mostly across board? It's gotta be a rifling, throat/chamber, bad chrome lining or crown

>>30746215
Yes, every rifle affected

>>30746140
thats no excuse when our military's M4s are times more accurate and accuracy is fucking important in a military rifle too, and why should I buy this thing when I'm not going into combat but target shooting or hunting? Like we're discussing it as a civilian weapon here and what use is it if it can't hit the broad side of a barn

>>30746128
>No actually, no ones figured it out yet.
which means nobody wants to becuase they're already selling every unit they manufacture.

keep drinkin the kool-aid, kid.

>>30745884

That is the most mall-ninja polymer (((mako))) rifle with the most (((mako))) designed accessories I've seen.

>>30746253
M4's average 2-3moa.
The second they dump that old KAC garbage and free float the arsenal with an MWS2 kit is (while we are at it dump the shitty matech buis too) the second they all drop under 2MOA

>>30746287
How does me not buying this rifle mean I'm drinking kool aid ?

>>30745884
Trick him into checking out your oven and then shove him into it.

>>30746140
>combat weapon
>5moa
I'll fight with a tack driver then, thank you

Downsides:
>Shit trigger
>unbalanced
>slower reloads
Upsides:
>it's short

File: aug.png (168KB, 800x269px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 800x269px

>>30745884

They're good enough I suppose, but I'd have a lot of trouble justifying one when pic related exists and is better in every conceivable way.

>>30745978
>doesn't love AK ergos
Get fucked.
AKs are ergonomic as fuck.