Annoying Phrases

>>30738573

/sage

File: 1469172428683.jpg (42KB, 699x549px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 699x549px

>knockdown power
>on handguns

>>30738573

"throw some lead down range"

"What kind of 'x' accessory are you 'runnin' on your 'x' gun"

FORSE POJEKSHON

>Don't jerk the trigger, squeeze it
GODDAMNIT WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN YOU OLD FUDD.

FUCKING REEEEEEEEE

>>30740242
Sounds like you didn't have a grandpa to teach you how to shoot. It means to slowly pull the trigger, because if you just slam it, you'll jerk the gun.

>>30740270
Which is good advice, yes.

Except literally every piece of advice for getting gud has always been "squeeze, don't jerk"
It's like the "turn it off and turn it back on" of the gun world.

File: image.jpg (101KB, 600x1010px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 600x1010px

>pill
>this is a 175gr pill right here

Fucking cringe

>>30739049
>>30738919
>>30738573
STOPPAN POWAH

>>30740286
that's because it is
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSMqH_qQm9A

Anything with the constitution on it. Gadsen flag. 3pers. Oath keepers. Overweight middle aged men.

Guns don't kill people.

>>30740242
Calm down. This is good instruction.

You gently squeeze the trigger. Squeeze, squeeze, squeeze... The report should surprise you. Any sniper ought to tell you that.

>>30740307
>Guns don't kill people.
Are you implying an inanimate object CAN kill someone?

>>30738919
This is the best version of this meme I've seen.

File: gettin' real tired of your BS.png (305KB, 500x405px) Image search: [Google]

305KB, 500x405px

Not so much a phrase but an attitude

>I enjoy dressing up as a girl and sticking animal-shaped dildos in my ass.
>I fantasize I'm 9yos while I do it and also have a collection of "manga" and erotic stories about "lolis" who are totally of age guise they just look little there is literally nothing wrong with appreciating "loli art."
>I also happen to own a shitty Russian rifle from the 30's. This means we are on the same side and you are a stupid redneck Christian bigot if you're uncomfortable at the idea of me marching next to your kids to protest gun control while still wearing my retarded little girl dress, probably with a vibrator in my ass

>Oh you're trying to discuss guns? Let me post a picture of my ass in little girl panties and stockings with half a fucking novel about what I want done to me
>Oh but my SKS/nugget/tacticool AR/Galil is in the background so I'm not off-topic
>Go back to Barfcom fundie

>>30740657
>posted while masturbating furiously

>>30740678
>thinks vocal minority is indicative of everyone enjoying the same types of degeneracy

File: dw568ead34-2348f974810.jpg (101KB, 640x426px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 640x426px

>>30740560
Gins are designed to kill and they're really fucking good at it. The sentiment behind the phrase is that it takes a human to pull the trigger, but it also also implies that guns are harmless bunnies.

No.

Guns are literally killing machines. Machines designed to kill. I hate the phrase because its oversaid and usually accompanied by a bunch of dumbass progun rhetoric with no facts. Guns are literally designed to kill but still kill significantly less people per year than cars. That is a better way to go about it than to be an overweight 45 year old man with a goatee and a Harley Davidson like pic

File: tmp_10557-14593685203271858596409.png (19KB, 460x356px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 460x356px

>>30740657
cry moar faglord.

>>30740749
>and they're really fucking good at it.
But they're not though. Two out of three patients with gun shot wounds survive. At best, guns are mediocre at killing people.

>>30740749
there are almost no guns commonly found on the civilian market today that were designed to kill a human. many were modeled after firearms that were designed to kill, but were themselves made for range use or hunting.

File: 1469157629955.jpg (9KB, 261x262px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 261x262px

>>30738919
>>30740575

>mfw a black co-worker of his tries to restrain him
>mfw he shouts "GET AWAY FROM ME RACIST" at him
>mfw he runs out in to the street shirtless

>>30740749
>but it also also implies that guns are harmless bunnies.

No one is implying that.

Don't get your panties in a wad.

>>30740657
I disagree. While the cross-dressers are cancerous, it's their white knights who give them so much attention in their threads, and then try to force their homo fantasies whenever someone else posts a girl with a gun who is even remotely flat or tomboyish, who are the real cancer. Without the white knights, the cross-dressers would leave /k/ overnight.

>>30742106
the cross dressers NEVER leave.

>>30742122
Because people here give them attention. The PURPOSE of cross-dressing is to get attention.

>>30742150
I'mv really convinced that anywhere from 30% to 95% of the posts in a thread that reply to them are them samefagging their own thread. They are delusional, not just in their gender, but in many other ways as well.

File: tmp_10557-1459917704982-1136716591.jpg (12KB, 200x314px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 200x314px

>>30740749
>comes to 4chan
>complains about thr degeneracy and tries to get everyone to accommodate his special needs
I'll never understand you people

>>30740242
Lol
>>30740270
This

>>30740560
not anon..... but an inanimate object can indeed kill someone. but sometimes it requires an outside force to do so...... dont mind me im just here for the bantzz.

>>30740749
>but it also also implies that guns are harmless bunnies.
Guns are designed to kill, and that's what makes them good, but they are not inherently dangerous, like liberals try to imply in their rhetoric. It's possible to carry a gun every day and not put a single other person in danger. However, for example, it's not possible to operate a motor vehicle in a way that doesn't put yourself or other people in danger. Liberals actually think that a holstered or slung firearm can go off on its own, or induce the owner into irrational and violent behavior.

>>30738573

Agree with platform.

I hate the phrase operator, their units have names for a reason.

As a bong i hate everyone calling anything that isn't organic 'kit'. "this is a good bit of kit" ect.

I hate people who watched gen kill and now call middle eastern people 'Hajis'. Some goes for BHD and skinnies.

>>30740657
I enjoy the culture of /k/
It's the reason I got into guns (well the reason I got my first gun, then I realized I really like them)

It would feel wrong if the traps left...
You can chat about guns on any fucking gunsite. It's the culture that make /k/ special.

>>30740749

it must be hard being so deluded. Guns in the civilian market are designed for target shooting, not killing. a majority of guns are designed with safeties in place specifically to prevent them from firing without an outside force acting on them.

File: 2601158.jpg (1MB, 1062x1505px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1062x1505px

>>30740657
>this faggot doesn't enjoy a nice loli doujin

File: e42.png (200KB, 356x256px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 356x256px

>>30742691
Don't fucking kid yourself. I am 1000% in favor of the 2A, I believe everyone has the right to own a firearm, and I think gun control is bullshit- but firearms are called fireARMS for a reason. They are armaments designed to destroy or kill a target- whether that target is paper, an animal, or a person.

>>30742843
Where the problem comes from is that hoplophobes say they're only for killing /people/, not hunting, target shooting, plinking, etc., but people.

>>30742963
But it's equally as retarded as to say "guns aren't for killing and if you think otherwise then ur a fucking libral commie faggot"

The point is, firearms weren't originally designed for people to put holes in paper with. They're classified as weapons for a reason- they are built to destroy things. The target of said destruction can be variable, but the fact remains that guns are weapons.

Nobody here seems to lose their shit when people say that swords were designed for killing or destroying, but when the same is applied to firearms, everyone starts to spew their vitrol at one another.

>>30743002
Nobody's arguing to ban all swords to "save thuh chillens" either.

>>30740713
>Degeneracy

>>>/pol/ is that way

File: 1463078846575.png (382KB, 848x739px) Image search: [Google]

382KB, 848x739px

>punch the gun out!
>stopping power
>double strike capability
>guns don't kill people, people kill people

>>30743467
Tell that to the UK.

>>30738573
>a safety is unnecessary and people who prefer one are pussies!!!
>bullpups aren't an improvement and offer no pros over a standard rifle, why would I want a smaller phallic symbol?

File: 1450210756233.jpg (16KB, 418x354px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 418x354px

>>30743565
guns don't kill people, people kill people
>not locking up your guns so it doesn't walk out the door and start killing people all by itself
>mfw

>>30740749
>muh designed to kill

Every time I hear this I cringe a little.
First off, in the strictest sense, guns are devices that propel projectiles with explosive force at high speeds in a specific direction.
Secondly, whenever you are using something for a task it wasn't designed for, it implies you are using it wrong. So if someone uses their guns to shoot non-living targets, by that logic, they aren't using their guns properly.
So anyone who uses "muh designed to kill" argument either doesn't know the ways guns are used (ignorant, but fixable), believes the only proper way to use a gun is if it's being used to kill something (insane), or is being deliberately dishonest (a douchebag).

>>30743645
>needing a safety
>bullpups are objectively better :^)
>le epic phallic symbol gun equivalency XD

You tried really hard to establish yourself as fucking retarded, huh

>>30740575
>>30738919
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LhqUk28OwHs

File: 1461863314625.jpg (2MB, 2656x1494px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2656x1494px

>>30740657

File: 1469261945611.jpg (40KB, 687x476px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 687x476px

>>30740657
>all of the butthurt faggots that replied to this post

disgusting

>>30742843
I would argue it's more the cartridge than the firearm itself. "Guns" as we think of them are basically fancy tubes for a bullet to be propelled through, that's about it. Most of the features on guns are there for a purpose aside from killing. AR's look like they do for a lot of reasons, but mostly they are logistical. They are light, relatively easy to maintain, I would say reliable (fuck off, not what this thread is about) and simple to use. They became shorter not because it makes them kill better, but because our troops are now frequently in and out of vehicles and fighting in close quarters like buildings. Guns are not designed to shoot anything specific, just to puke bullets out. Different cartridges are designed for shooting different things.

>>30740657

Bravo.

>>30740560
I hope you never get caught in an avalanche, you might be confused.

>>30740657
literally the only part of your post that can be agreed with is the second half

otherwise fuck off to reddit

>>30742672

> crossdressers are what makes /k/ special

This is 2nd-Obama-term era faggotry. This and faggy generals weren't here before and this stuff popped up the same time tranny bathrooms and cis white male stuff became big. The degeneracy used to be a joke, but now it's becoming a community of trannies and their fans that are shitting up the board.

Also those stupd tripfags

>>30742963
Guns are not only for killing people, but that's the most important role they serve. The problem is this mythology of the modern liberal world that killing people is always bad when in fact there's an infinity of situations where killing a person is not only justified, it is the best option.

>>30738573
________ niggers. Racism isn't funny guys.

It just makes you look like a tool.

>>30744227
shut up nigger

>>30742260
>>30744111
Not him, but those would be animated objects.

File: FAGGOTS!.jpg (23KB, 198x600px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 198x600px

anyone who says they need their guns to "defend from tyranny" or "scare the government" sounds like an edgelord pansy who would not do jack shit if the cops rolled up on him

also, americans who insist that no other western country could possibly have any kind of sensible gun laws

and for that matter, americans who get triggered by the phrase "sensible gun laws" and assume it must mean "ALL GUNS ARE BANNED RRAGH GRAB LE GUNS AND BAN ASSAULT WEAPONS I AM A SOCCER MOM"

also anyone who calls guns "funs", those people just sound like they would be unsafe and not at all respect that firearms are in fact dangerous devices and that some basic safety rules should be followed in their handling and operation

basically i hate american gun culture as a whole, really, it makes me ashamed to think guns are interesting and useful and --dare I say-- fun devices

>>30740657
triggered

File: trump faggot.png (371KB, 645x450px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 645x450px

>>30740657

>>30744246
Any law that restricts the use of firearms by the civilian population in any way is not sensible, commie.

>>30740657
I agree with you.

>>30744183
nigga please. your tripfagging ass must not have been here long if you think this shit wasn't around before the bathroom shit.

this isn't pol
this is k
now get out

>>30744235
Did Micky mouse steal a spell book.

Or are you just retarded enough to think an avalanche is a living thing. Your either a troll or ignorant of what animate means in this context.

>>30744246
>triggered
you sure are

>>30744246
You sound like a little cuck commie bitch

>>30744258
exactly what I'm talking about. How do you know what I meant by "sensible"? Why beeline to calling me a commie? fuck you, kneejerk fudd piece of shit. I hope the cops come for you and take your guns. not guns in general. just yours.

>>30744277
that was the intent, to say that i am triggered by his hatred of knee-high socks and vibrators

>>30743905
>>muh designed to kill
>
>Every time I hear this I cringe a little.
>First off, in the strictest sense, guns are devices that propel projectiles with explosive force at high speeds in a specific direction.
>Secondly, whenever you are using something for a task it wasn't designed for, it implies you are using it wrong. So if someone uses their guns to shoot non-living targets, by that logic, they aren't using their guns properly.
>So anyone who uses "muh designed to kill" argument either doesn't know the ways guns are used (ignorant, but fixable), believes the only proper way to use a gun is if it's being used to kill something (insane), or is being deliberately dishonest (a douchebag).

You're an idiot. The first guns ever invented were meant for war, not hunting, and certainly not for your pointless proposal of "propelling projectiles with explosive force" for no practical purpose.

>>30744300
Because you don't need to make a law about something unless you intend to restrict it, commie.

>>30744246
>anyone who says they need their guns to "defend from tyranny" or "scare the government" sounds like an edgelord pansy who would not do jack shit if the cops rolled up on him
That's not an argument.

>>30744303
Wrong the first guns were used by the Chinese to intimidate enemies with "sorcery".

>>30744300
>How do you know what I meant by "sensible"?

He doesn't need to know, faggot. Any law that restricts firearms in the slightest is commie shit and any American that supports it should be executed for treason.

File: 1467035559839.jpg (136KB, 1300x861px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1300x861px

>>30744271
Inanimate means not moving and animate means moving.

We're animate, and guns are too when they are being used.

When we die, we are inanimate, just as a gun with no wielder

Inanimate =/= dead/never been alive
Inanimate = not moving

animate =/= living
animate = moving

>>30744307
>Because you don't need to make a law about something unless you intend to restrict it, commie.

literally what is your lame "SHALL NOT INFRINGE" meme, fuddlord alt-right whitey cuck shitter faggot

>>30744322
I never said it was an argument, I said it was annoying

americans are all shit and i hope clinton wins just out of spite for americans

>>30744323
What's wrong about what I said?

>intimidating the enemy
Were they just "enemies" in intramural sports? You're literally proving me right.

>>30743976
Classy

But very, very gay.

>>30744344
>restricts
exactly my point. what about "sensible" means "restricts" you fucking cucklord militia shill

>>30744346
Literally everything on earth is moving in some sense. Fuck off and die idiot.

>>30744352
>I said it was annoying
So, what do you expect from us in response to that?

>>30744352
Oh I see, you're just bitter as fuck because you'ree not free.

>>30744365
i'm not sure. it would have been more advantageous to you to not immediately do the exact things I complained about and instead be reasonable in your responses

such as not immediately associating "sensible" with "restrictive", assume that guns absolutely are banned everywhere else, etc

pig filth american, you are just like all the rest. your behaviour is why the anti-gunners from commiefornia and jew york hate you so much. it's not the guns themselves, it's your shitty attitude.

>>30744362
Relative to what?

Relative to the earth, they aren't moving, unless you're talking about on the atomic level.

>"dont muzzle sweep me or my son ever again"
>"SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED"

since when does 2a mean you should be as unsafe as possible

lathes are legal, should you go working with them without eye pro and wearing long hair and shit?

same with shit like clearing in unsafe directions (or while pointing the gun at people), not clearing rifles at all, literally why is the response to "please avoid accidents" to chimp out about 2a

>>30744398
Go one then, tell us what a sensible gun law s, jackass.

File: 1467673061517.jpg (52KB, 651x652px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 651x652px

>>30744352
>Americans are all shit and i hope Clinton wins just out of spite for Americans

t. Euro cuck

>>30744424
>sen·si·ble
>ˈsensəb(ə)l/
>adjective
>adjective: sensible

>1. (of a statement or course of action) chosen in accordance with wisdom or prudence; likely to be of benefit.

>>30744443
Give me an example, fuckboy.

>>30740657
(You)

>>30744398
My first post was the one that pointed out how you had not made an argument. By asking what you expected of your initial post, I am trying to understand the degree to which you are intentionally trying to be disrespectful, weighed against the possibility that you are simply being provocative in hopes of a debate.

If you're telling the truth in how you were "not sure" how we would respond to that kind of post, then I've got to think that you're very naive about these topics, as well as human nature, for that matter. You really need to lurk more, even if you just want to troll us. Your attitude is too obvious and even the people responding to you aren't doing it because they are taking you seriously, but rather because they think they can put you down more effectively than your attempt to put them down, which is not really where you want to be, as a reasonable debater or a troll. That's just schoolyard name-calling.

>>30738573
mushroom core-lokt

File: Pistol_v_SBR.jpg (1MB, 2157x1417px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2157x1417px

>>30744469
i know one already implemented, it begins with SHALL

j/k but seriously when I think "sensible gun law", I think one that is easy to navigate to get what you want and includes clear definitions for what is or is not a firearm. as opposed to the labyrinth of red tape that is the ATF that thinks shit like shoestrings are machine guns if you tie one end around a Mini-14 or whatever, or the retardedness surrounding stocks and stock-like devices on short rifles magically changing their status from OK to NOT OK over a couple of zap-straps

>>30744480
>you had not made an argument.
why did you come to a thread titled "annoying phrases" and expect actual political arguments and not just things that grind people's gears

are you stupid or something

>>30744543
Why, though? Why would we need a formal, legal definition of what makes a firearm if we don't intend to legislate on it further?

>>30744543
People have made effective arguments. See: >>30740657

>>30744554
>Why, though? Why would we need a formal, legal definition of what makes a firearm if we don't intend to legislate on it further?
So you can include specific caveats for the government to not be allowed to legislate on it further, and for more boring reasons like figuring out which kind of sales tax applies to it (if any; not legislating them at all would mean that sales tax for a similar kind of item would have to be applied, instead of "none at all because SHALL"), rules for importing from which countries, what standards manufacturers have to subscribe to (including and especially conditions in facilities for workers, rather than features for end users), all sorts of stuff that is a lot more boring and not tyrannical than BANNING ALL LE GUNS 4EVER.

It is INCREDIBLY important to have legal definitions of things if you seek to protect them under law, and even if you don't believe that, it's still important for all the boring stuff like shipping labels and workplace safety and shit.

There's also stuff only tertiary, like how in many countries, replica guns have to have features that immediately identify them as toys, for the safety of users playing with them so they don't get domed by police or have tons of bullshit 911 calls as a result of backyard airsoft games with LARPers that act too well. Or standards for hunting; having to use things like steel shot instead of lead for environmental protection reasons, or not being allowed to hunt deer with things lower than a .230.

Failing to adequately define things before getting started on lawmaking is how you end up with bullshit like the ATF.

>>30744555
>See: >>30740657
not an argument

I get mad triggered by gear queers because I'm cheap and it pisses me off that people can be so bad with their money.

You do NOT need to pay 69 dollars for a hat just because it comes in tan and has a velcro bit on it. And flagbearer hats are tacky as shit anyway, you could get a proper embroidered cap for less anyway.

Same with shit like tactical pants and admin pouches and shit. You don't just look like a tool, you look like a tool with bad money management skills.

>>30744698
I'm cheap af too but I'm not sure why that bothers you.

>>30744352
>fuddlord alt-right whitey cuck shitter faggot
>so unfree that he resorts to buzzwords
lmao yurop

>>30744761
its probably just a butthurt sandnigger yurop is flooded with them

>>30744717
It's the ineptitude combined with their attitude of being oh so self-sufficient.

Like they're going to survive the end of the world when they literally can't even find a pair of pants at a department store, let alone sew their own badges on.

Also, needing "infographics" for every little thing. Like that "DIY Mag-pulls" one where it's literally just "duct tape a piece of string to a magazine".

I swear, those people will be the first to die when any shit actually ever goes down.

>>30744352
better get off 4chan before Merkel finds out and Swats your shit into jail where mahmoud is waiting for you

>>30740335
>The report should surprise you.
Here's another one I hate.

File: 1469286174032.jpg (14KB, 320x320px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 320x320px

>>30744698
Are you triggered that I own a $90 sling? Eat shit, poorfag...

>>30744246
Your entire post pretty much belongs in this thread.

>>30742004
Humans are close enough to deer and pigs to where I'd say a gun intentionally designed to kill deer, pigs, or (insert large mammal here) is also going to be designed to be good at killing people.

Also, if your gun is modeled after a military firearm that is designed to kill people it's the same shit in my book. Even if it's not 100% the same, it's close enough

>>30744246
>people who act all stupid and call firearms stupid shit like 'funs' make me feel unsafe
>guys, I totally own a gun and have owned one long enough to feel comfortable around it

If they follow all the basic rules of weapon safety, you have no reason to bitch, bitch.

>>30744346
>not knowing what context means

>>30743976
I wish I could trap.

>>30738573
>induce the owner into irrational and violent behavior.

First result, click and read. Just sayin


https://scholar.google.es/scholar?q=Weapons+as+aggression-eliciting+stimuli&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_xKTvu43OAhVEVRoKHT32BXgQgQMIGTAA

>>30744352
>I hope Clinton wins
>spite for Americans

>I would use a katana to defend my home
>even though I have no training in using one

Nobody, whose opinion should be taken seriously in any situation, says asinine shit like you did.

>I hate people who watched gen kill and now call middle eastern people 'Hajis'. Some goes for BHD and skinnies.


That's pretty fucked up, do people actually do that shit?

>>30744859
peanut butter and jealous as fuck

>>30746175
the point is intent. knives were originally made to kill other living things, including humans but we dont say they were designed to kill because they are almost never (but still more than rifles) used that way.

>Also, if your gun is modeled after a military firearm that is designed to kill people it's the same shit in my book. Even if it's not 100% the same, it's close enough
then youre an idiot

>>30740657
Agreed, trannies are insane faggots who want their extreme sexual fetish recognized as a "lifestyle", they are the equivalent of a furry demanding he wear his fur suit to his office job or a surgeon fighting for the right to operate while wearing a shit filled fetish diaper.

The creeps that constantly whiteknight and spout off about trannies are the fucking worst, that combination of unaware "leave m'lady alone" thirstiness and hardcore brony tier obsession has created the most cancerous shit I've seen in the 8 years I've been here.

>>30746423
>hating trannies this much
If they're distractingly obvious men in women's clothing, sure, but if it takes a bit to figure out or you straight up can't tell it's biologically male, calm your tits.

File: 1469301269590.gif (2MB, 245x247px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 245x247px

>>30746309
>That's pretty fucked up, do people actually do that shit?

Dude, have you read any of the posts that people write on 4chan?

File: 1467355596162.jpg (100KB, 438x810px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 438x810px

>>30746423
>>30746465

No idea what's going on
No idea wha tyou are arguing about

But I see Trannies are involved

Just chiming in because I can

They are Freaks

You are something but you think you are something else...... Yeah... Mental Illness no matter the mental gymnastics you do around it

You may continue your banter

Press F for respects to my Opinion
>And I am right

>>30746626
No question the brain of a tranny is fucked up, but I have no issue with them if they're at least mostly convincing.

>>30746758
>No question the brain of a tranny is fucked up, but I have no issue with them if they're at least mostly convincing.
Lmao faggot
Still a man in a dress and that is some fucked up shit.

>but I have no issue with them

I feel the same about necrophiliacs and people who eat shit
It doesn't hurt anyone and it doesn't bother me.

>>30746626
F

>>30746879


Thank you my inferior melanin enriched individual

>>30746626
F

>>30746907
F
(Because I am racist)

>>30746465
>if they're distractingly obvious men in women's clothing, sure, but if it takes a bit to figure out or you straight up can't tell it's biologically male, calm your tits.

>Implying trannies aren't always obvious in some way
>implying anything can change their voices and pheromones
>Implying it should be socially acceptable to warp your body with chemicals and become a eunuch because "muh feelings"

Inb4 "but I saw a convincing tranny on the internet!"
Inb4 "go to /pol/ cuz muh hurt feelz"

>>30746932
I don't think it should be socially acceptable to wear sagged skinny jeans and a cap lightly perched on your head, and I wouldn't do anything to stop someone beating the shit out of someone for doing that, but opinion < law.

>>30747014
>I don't think it should be socially acceptable to wear sagged skinny jeans and a cap lightly perched on your head, and I wouldn't do anything to stop someone beating the shit out of someone for doing that


>Implying it is
>Implying cutting you fucking dick off is even relatable to fucking sagging your god dam fucking pants lmao

>>30744246
Yes, please fuck off back to Europoor land Muhammad.

>>30747143
Why do you even care?

>>30747143
To me, dressing like microwaved dog shit is just as bad as getting a sex change. It's all a matter of opinion.

File: 1453922348921.jpg (181KB, 1262x853px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1262x853px

Whenever a European gets interested in owning a gun and comes to /k/ to ask about the process Americans treat him like shit, blame him for his governments idiocy, call him names, gloat about 2nd amendment.

>>30747263
>>30746932
I've never seen moral relativism to the point where wearing ugly pants is the same as horribly mutilating your body to pass as the opposite gender.

>Millenials

>>30747329
That does piss me off. I imagine the murder/k/ube is unhappy with those people.

>>30747347
Which one is far more common and thus a much larger problem?

>>30740242
Do you......even shoot your guns?

>[insert common caliber here] is shit for self-defense
>[insert caliber here] is designed to wound, not kill
>[insert weapon/caliber here] is for pussies [do not include "compared to this"]
>"ak47", describing every weapon in the ak family
>assault weapon
purely political term
>high capacity magazine
I could potentially link enough rounds together to have more ammo than the weapon can shoot. The barrel could be conpletely shot out and nonfunctional by the time the belt runs out.

>>30740242
why is anyone letting such an autist like you anywhere near a weapon?

>stopping power
>reach out and touch
>precision and accuracy being used interchangeably

>>30747685
>this weapon is extremely precise
sir, don't you mean accurate?
>no, seriously. the bullets just kinda start veering off when you don't have a living target, but you can pull the trigger with it pointed in any direction and the shit curves the fuck around and hits any enemy in the area.

>>30740307
this, all of this

>>30743916
Here's another one

>If you disagree with me you're a fucking retard lol!

File: 1451340968125.jpg (13KB, 472x357px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 472x357px

>>30740657
i generally agree with the sentiment in this post

>>30740657
I agree 200%

>>30740242
But that's functional fuddlore. You just slowly pull the trigger instead of jerking on it like a CoD kiddie playing Xbox.

>>30744246
>sensible gun laws

>>30744352
it is not a meme it is the constitution

>>30744246
why are Europeans so holier than though

>>30744246
(((Anonymous)))

>>30740657
Pretty much this

>>30740287
This one really bothers me. Partially why I don't watch IV8888 anymore.

>>30747329

yea that fucky kind of attitude is why ive never taken a carbine course or anything. ive noticed a lot with gun people if youre not some 5.11 pants wearing fucktard you get treated like youre an idiot. those people are putting on some kind of persona its sad as fuck. like all of them are fucking buck yeager or larry vickers MUH SERIOUS KNOW IT ALL YOURE FUCKING STUPID HAHAHA FUCKING FAG.

that attitude is what pushes people away. be fucking normal and cool and people will be interested. ive gotten 3 people now to buy ARs that werent really into it before. i didnt do that by being a holier than thou know it all faggot. i did direct them to come here and just lurk because i have learned so goddamn much about guns from being here and rarely post.

>>30740335
> The report should surprise you
This is complete retardation. If any of you ever tell this to a new shooter I'll fuck your dog. This is how new shooters develop flinches

>>30744246
>and for that matter, americans who get triggered by the phrase "sensible gun laws" and assume it must mean "ALL GUNS ARE BANNED RRAGH GRAB LE GUNS AND BAN ASSAULT WEAPONS I AM A SOCCER MOM"
Except that's what most of the people suggesting "sensible gun laws" are trying to do. And what gun grabbers would gladly use "sensible gun laws" as a springboard for.

How are the gun laws we have on the books already not sensible?

>>30742672
>Traps are /k/
Wanna know how I know you joined us under two years ago?

>>30744362
>>30744409
>pedantic pissing contest becomes argument about frames of reference
Never change, /k/

File: Superb_Hunting_Partner.jpg (55KB, 515x700px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 515x700px

>>30746175
>Also, if your gun is modeled after a military firearm that is designed to kill people it's the same shit in my book. Even if it's not 100% the same, it's close enough

What if a modern military firearm is modelled after my firearm? What if my firearm was developed first, and THEN the police and military choose to buy it?

You know, like 99% of firearms in existence?

>>30744352
>>30744361
Are you done just putting random words together?

>>30748084
Anticipating the report is how you start flinching.

By "surprise" it means you should be pulling the trigger like you're not expecting it to fire (although you're still holding the weapon like you are, so you can maintain control over it)

>>30748084
Da fug?
A flinch is only relevant if you do it before the shot. If you are surprised by the shot, how can you flinch beforehand?

The issue is retards like you, they scope a target, finger on the trigger, close both eyes, lock up, and pull as hard as possible. They then decided to field-strip their AR every time they go to the range because "sumting iss jus rong bubba"

>>30744698
>I'm cheap
>I'm poor
Choose one, faggot

>>30748084
Heres what i do:

1- give them unloaded semi rifle
2- tell them to pull trigger and hold it
3- CLUNK
4- while they hold the dry-fired gun, i pull back charging handle
5- tell them to slowly let go of trigger
6- CLICK as the trigger resets. Their finger is now at the "break point" pressure. Any more pressure on the trigger and it will fire.

then you dont flinch, you know almost exactly how much you squeeze before bang

>>30748148
This guy gets it.

>>30738573
>"Running" a gun.

>>30748183
>>30748189
You flinch because you anticipate the recoil, yes. But you don't learn anything when you can't tell when the fucking break is. You learn where the break is and every subsequent shot surprises you less. This is basic shit guys, c'mon

>>30748233
>running
Dude. running, in that context, is just the best word for that activity. Try coming up with a one-word synonym that encompasses everything "running" does.

>>30748258
Nigro, unless you are a competetive marksman, on a long range target, a smooth pull is better than sitting on the break, any day of the week.
People get too overexcited when sitting on the break, and tense for the shot subconsiously. Hold the rifle steady on target, let it rest naturally where you want to shoot, keep both eyes open, breath out, squeeze the trigger smoothly to the back of the guard in one motion.
This will result in more accurate and repeatable shots 98% of the time on a "normal" firearm at an "average" range. Only time you need to play on the break is pretty much in a military setting, where the wind/shot/elevation will change rapidly in the few seconds it takes to smoothly pull the trigger back.

I compete as a marksman, and place reasonably, this is the technique that olympic shooters use. Watch their fingers next week.

>>30747591
The problem is dressing like a faggot isn't permanent. This tranny shit th left is pushing so hard IS far more permanent, and damaging to society as a whole. This is the same as telling an anorexic it's ok for them to starve themselves. Trannies are mentally ill people who need help. Not an echo chamber telling them it's ok to be a complete freak of nature. That they're "so brave".
They're sick, and the more they try to force their degenerate fetish on the public the more I grow to hate them.

>>30740657
>Sa/k/uya: The post.
He's got a point guys.

>>30748549
Did I say I would ever allow a person under the age of 18 to do that shit? No. You act your gender, and your gender is determined by chromosomes.

>>30738573
>Clips
>I will not use the weapon of my enemy(AK's)
>Martial Law

>>30748754
>martial law
>getting triggered by this
Hurricane Katrina, post-storm, as National Guard moved in.

>>30744246
>Europe
>Defending oneself

Have fun spending more time in jail than the perps

>>30748802
Its more of when they use it as a term for a few cops being on the side walk.

>>30738573
>I wouldn't trust my life to anything but X brand

Hate that shit. It's a clear indicator that the speaker knows very little about the actual manufacturing process of the product they hold in such high regard.

>>30748258
>dry firing to figure out where the break is is impossible
>figuring out where the break is in the course of shooting the weapon is impossible

>>30748721
Even over 18. Society has to have some standards and rules. And allowing sexual deviants to try and force their illness like its normal is wrong.

File: c518ac7bbec3b5061660cec0c38d785be26c0ff6de8b4d82835718bd9b199610.jpg (18KB, 240x260px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 240x260px

>>30740657

What's wrong, did a neckbearded furry fuck you up the ass with his nugget?

>>30748991
See
>>30748695

>>30748918
nogunz

>>30744698

Look nigger, just because you don't like the pewpewlife hats doesn't mean we can't wear them

File: 1468671587516.png (244KB, 598x365px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 598x365px

KICKS LIKE A MULE
>KICKS LIKE A MULE
KICKS LIKE A MULE
>KICKS LIKE A MULE
KICKS LIKE A MULE
>KICKS LIKE A MULE
KICKS LIKE A MULE
>KICKS LIKE A MULE

>>30749111
>being mad at a cliche
do explain

File: images (1).jpg (5KB, 193x144px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 193x144px

>>30738573
>high speed, low drag

File: 1459823094839.jpg (59KB, 372x512px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 372x512px

>>30738573
>I can wait to get drunk and die of alcohol poisoning.

>>30740657
This.

File: tmp_23355-14516355693841850367792.jpg (154KB, 750x422px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 750x422px

>>30749000
so he owns a PTR and has low self-esteem?

>>30749195
???did you read the thread?

>ITT: A bunch of developed faggots who are triggered by a few simple phrases or ideas.

>>30749822
t. Guy whose buttmad because somewhere in this thread is a phrase he says.

>>30748894
Tbh I'd take a DI AR for target shooting, but I'd rather have something piston driven by H&K if I had to trust my life on a gun.
There are better target/range guns, but I have the utmost confidence in their products durability and reliability.

File: 1466900511076.jpg (73KB, 800x598px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 800x598px

>>30740657

>>30738573
>"blitzkreig"
>tfw the wehrmacht never used the term
>tfw the phrase was coined by an American journalist
>tfw it wasn't invented as a new form of warfare, all the Germans did was wage war with better technology, that happened to make invasions go by fast

File: 1469120991987.png (481KB, 475x599px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 475x599px

>>30740657
This, most definitely. It's not 'homophobia', it's them being humongous attention whores and posting something that has no bearing on the discussion, and really isn't /k/-related at all.

File: tmp_23355-1453867551610-1732324845.jpg (42KB, 960x952px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 960x952px

>>30749822
welcome to 4chan, international "STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE!" headquarters.

File: 1466105345951.gif (2MB, 372x323px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 372x323px

>>30738573
>this would make a perfect zombie apocalypse weapon
THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN YOU RETARDED AUTISTIC SACK OF SHIT! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: 1417675638035.jpg (38KB, 283x352px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 283x352px

>>30744246
>It's a 'Holier-than-thou European rants about how much he hates Americans for no discernible reason' episode

>>30747329
The reason this happens is because of guys like this: >>30744246

>>30742503
But that's the actual defenition of kit.

>>30748355
Not him but you're still missing his point. He never said that you stay on the break, he said you should know where the break is. The saying "the report should surprise you" is incomplete because it implies you shouldn't know where the break is. You can pull smoothly AND know where the break is.

>>30744246
>and for that matter, americans who get triggered by the phrase "sensible gun laws" and assume it must mean "ALL GUNS ARE BANNED RRAGH
The vast majority of people who say stuff like "common sense gun laws" don't have a single fucking clue how firearms work. Or they're politicians working piecemeal. Either way you shouldn't trust their suggestion because they're either ignorant or malicious

>>30744246
"sensible gun laws" is libtard speak for banning the flavor of the month babykillingenst weapon

File: 1459253240840.jpg (3KB, 125x125px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 125x125px

>>30738573
I don't trust my life to a high speed low drag knockdown power weapons system platform

>>30749886
>blitzkreig
>kreig

>>30739022
Looking at you, IV8888.

>>30740242
Faggot

>>30738573
>hello
>excuse me
>I have an emergency
>How are you?
>______________?
>sir, ___________
Or the most annoying
>It's yours

>>30750095
If you pull smoothly you don't need to know where the break is.
That's the whole point, you don't fuck up your accuracy by trying to stop your finger pull.

You know, I don't know why I expected anything else from this thread, and I shouldn't be dissapointed, but I am. Literally the only thing missing is Phil here screaming about the fags and the imgrants, and sa/k/uya being a huge attention whore

>>30741982
Those are just the ones who make it to the hospital

>>30740657
They might be homosexual deviants , but you are the real faggot here.

>>30751390
This

Being a deviant is literally the foundation of the United States as a whole, and yet people lose their shit over others doing things they don't like. Fucking grow up. I'll agree that attention whores are terrible, but that applies to any and all of them, not just the gay or trans ones.

>>30745818
It's actually really good advice for new shooters until they've acclimated and become comfortable shooters.

>>30751499
Nobody cares if people are gay. They just want them to not act like faggots. That's literally the foundation of human society and mutual cooperation.

>>30748220
The Dime/Washer drill is superior.

1: Clear rifle
2: Get them into firing position
3: Balance a small, light item like a dime or similarly sized washer on top of the barrel
4: If they have a clean trigger squeeze it won't fall
5: Repeat until they aren't dropping the dome anymore

For hard mode balance it on a cleaning rod inserted into the barrel.

>>30753703
But anon, many people do care if people are gay, because they know those people will raise adopted children to be gay, stick their dick in other men's buttholes on a regular basis, use drugs more regularly, are at a much higher risk for AIDS and other STD's, and end up being involved with gay and often liberal screamy problematic political groups that are hateful of Christians and other individuals who would prefer that gay people stop and rethink their gayness instead of running around ramming it down other's throats and working fervently to enact laws that restrict non-gay people from doing anything to "offend" them. Some gey people just sit around and have buttsex but their actions are not isolated from the rest of society.
Every society that has embraced homosexuality and sodomy have collapsed eventually.

t. history books

>>30753746
>Every society has collapsed eventually.

FTFY

>>30753732
the pencil in pistol barrel works good too. stick a pencil in the barrel and point your pistol at a paper target hanging in a doorway just a couple inches away from the target and try to maintain tiny groups of little holes. Massad Ayoob recommended this.

File: wrong.jpg (57KB, 500x282px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 500x282px

>>30753746
>will raise adopted children to be gay
This fucking retarded meme that being gay is a choice.

>>30753746
You are stupid on so many levels

File: genes.jpg (10KB, 275x183px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 275x183px

>>30753774
sorry kid, did your high school indoctrination really get to you that badly? The propaganda is working.

>muh genes

EVERYTHING gets blamed on genes in your pseudo science propaganda day prison skool world, so you can stuff your face with shit and stick your dick in your buddy's ass and "it'n not my choice!"

>>30753791
why don't you break it down for me, genius? Truth hurts? I'm sorry you are attracted to other men.

>>30753825
>Implying you aren't letting your personal bias discard everything that counters your beliefs

>>30738573

Molon labe
Punisher skulls
Gruntstyle and other brand graphic tees
III% vinyl all over cars and trucks
Gadsen flags, Gadsen flags everywhere
Fat fuck never-serveds playing pretend dress up in surplus
"I would have enlisted but-"

File: gaym1.jpg (149KB, 590x407px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 590x407px

>>30753870
I like to base my opinions on fact, anon. And if you ignore the sweeping tide of propaganda being jammed down your throat in school and most colleges today, you will be the one who is biased.

>>30753902
That's pretty funny, considering everything you've spouted so far is hate propaganda.

>>30749111
>the pic
FUDDS RE EEEEEEEEEEEEE E E E E E E E E E EEEEEEEEEEEE

File: Untitled (72).jpg (709KB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

709KB, 2560x1440px

>>30740657
Just for you.

>>30753950
>hate

Don't choke on your koolaid mr liberal. Shouldn't you be somewhere supporting Hillary, maybe handing out flyers?
If you get what the liberals want and what you think you want, this country will be a fucking shithole.

i don;t "hate" gays, I just know it is a bad lifestyle choice and every ex-gay person will tell you the exact same thing. It is a depressing, un-natural state of being.

>>30754015
>i don;t "hate" gays, I just know it is a bad lifestyle choice and every ex-gay person will tell you the exact same thing. It is a depressing, un-natural state of being.
>ex-gay
>Implying this is a real thing and not bullshit propaganda

>>30754125
Done arguing with you now, if you don't even believe this happens. We don't live in a fantasy world where flying the rainbow flag makes the world a better place, and thousands of testimonies exist from people that have quit the gay lifestyle after it destroyed their marriages and their lives.

Google is your friend, and please feel free to personally follow up with each and every one of the testimonies with a polite email to the people who told them to see if they are real and not unicorns.

>>30754189
Oh, there are certainly plenty of people who've been abused/bullied/brainwashed into the ex-gay mindset, but pretty much all of them recant once they get away from the people who did it with them, or have learned to keep it on the down-low. You're an idiot if you think it's real.

>>30754250
calling me an idiot doesn't erase the facts, and if you are unwilling to personally investigate it then you are ill qualified to argue with me about it.

So far itt I have been called idiot, retarded, stupid, and hateful while simultaneously being accused of hate speech. Do you see some hypocrisy here, friendo?

>>30738919
>THAT'S MY PURSE

>>30754282
I'm calling you an idiot because you have a confirmation bias treating the propaganda you listen to as facts. Period, end of story.

It's like you're a time traveler from the '50s with the bullshit you're spewing here.

>>30754291
>I DON'T KNOW YOU

>>30754305
Just stop anon, he doesn't realize that propaganda can be created by both sides of an argument, and he's clearly been buying into far too much of his favorite flavor of it to notice what it really is.

>>30754305
>>30754415
why don't you two boys find a quiet space to go cuddle in. <3

>FORSE MULIPLYER
>THANK YOU FOR YOR SHERVICE
>IN HARMS WAY
>MEN AND WOMYM OF UNIFIRM
>GOIN' HAWT (pew pew)

>>30754426
I thought that made you uncomfortable?

File: makeamericagr8.jpg (351KB, 619x843px) Image search: [Google]

351KB, 619x843px

It must just be a local thing, but here in my part of Texas, I often hear people describing recoil as "kick-back". It kind of rustles my jimmies.

>>30743905
spotted the autist

>>30754015
>ex-gay
>broken and brainwashed gay people that have been indoctrinated with fear for "MUH HELL" and to love "MUH JEEZUS"

If being gay really was a choice, there would be no gay people. As they would all choose to be straight; due to hatred put on them for being gay.

>>30753825
Literally every civilization falls. It has absolutely nothing to do with gayness. And if it did, then correlation =/= causation. But I guess they don't teach you that in jayzuz school.

>EVERYTHING gets blamed on genes in your pseudo science propaganda day prison skool world
Yes, I'm sure genes have nothing to do with it. People choose to have type 1 diabetes and mental retardation too.

>>30754498
He probably wants in and is jealous because he's closeted

>>30754426
you can always join fuckboi

>>30755569
I know. It is a hateful world and heterosexual people ruin it. It's obvious that genetics cause gayness. It's about time we band together and start showing everyone it is good and natural to be gay!!! Thank you based anon!

File: 1417385826621.jpg (18KB, 300x298px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x298px

>>30738573

The platform talk pisses me off.

Also anything made of plastic in the gun world magically becomes a much more sophisticated "polymer".

>>30755851
No thank you but enjoy your mans hairy anus, friend :^)

>>30756287
the more u know

http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-polymer-and-vs-plastic/

>>30756257
>Implying what two men do with each other is any of your business
>Implying your squick should determine law
I love how the conservitards scream about "muh freedom" from one side of the mouth and "kill the fags!" exercising freedom out the other.

>>30756399
sorry but what is a squick is that like a butt plug?

>>30756399
what if one man rapes the other man is that ok? im just saying, laws aside would that be ok in your book? not hating friend just want to find out where the boundary line is

>>30756432
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=squick

>>30756460
>what if one man rapes the other man is that ok?
That's still rape, anon. And there are laws against that already.

>>30756496
so squick is: Noun. The physical sense of repulsion upon encountering a concept or situation one finds disgusting. ?

rape: i said laws aside, would you think it was ok.

>>30756641
Regardless of if it harms anyone or anything or affects your life at all.

>>30756641
>rape: i said laws aside, would you think it was ok.
No, you fucking idiot.

>>30748306
Using...

>>30757004
how about consentual rape

>>30757891
That's not rape, it's called role-playing.

File: image.png (49KB, 255x139px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 255x139px

>>30744352