How many tanks do you think he btfo before he was kill?

File: Panzerfaust and Panzerschreck.webm (2MB, 586x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 586x480px

One or two. Maybe none.

>>30382740

Statistically, 0.

The Germans built 290,000 Panzerschrecks, the Allies combined lost about 20-30 thousand tanks after the introduction of the Panzerschreck.

>>30383510
You're not so good at how statistics work, are you?

These things were pretty hard to aim in combat since they were so big, you had to be pretty close to ensure a hit and expose yourself in order to aim it. Early handheld rockets were weapons of pure luck and a last resort.

>>30383532

> Random picture of a guy with Panzerschreck.
> Allies only lost 30,000 ish tanks after the introduction of the Panzerschreck
> Not enough tanks to kill, since kills are mostly integer, the max amount Panzerschrecks that could have scored tank kills is 10% of the production run.
> thus at least 90% of Panzerschrecks do not have tank kills.
> count in the fact that Germany had other anti-tank weapons in service.
> counting in that some Panzerschrecks likely have multiple kills
> likely high 99's % of Panzerschrecks did not have tank kills.

Going to make an educated guess and say the guy in this picture likely did not have a tank kill, just like 90+% of Panzerschrecks.

Only 1% of the population have expensive sports cars. How many Ferraris does the average person have?

0.

>>30383056
>Having to duck right after shooting to avoid shrapnel
Jesus

>>30383067
Wait I was under the impression that the panzerfaust was a one use type of rocket. By that video it seems like you would just need another warhead along with the firing element. Can anyone explain it to me?

>>30383067

I never understood how that thing can be rocket-propelled, blast back that big cloud of smoke, and yet it's still somehow okay to launch it from 36 inches away with the butt end pointed right at your damn face.

>>30386126

Think of it as a bazooka but the tube is disposable. They could be reloaded but due to lack of supplies they wouldn't bother.

>>30388568
The propelling charge is burning only in the launcher so projectile got speed only from what burned through the barrel.
Notice how slow it is

File: 1463445163203.gif (1MB, 264x264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 264x264px

>>30383789

this is the dumbest post i've seen on this board all week.

>>30388703
Why, because it proved you were wrong?

File: Cain.png (39KB, 150x220px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 150x220px

Some days are just bring it on days.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Henry_Cain

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tpg6h16k8eU