why is il-2 1946 the best ww2 flight sim in existance?

>>30380043
I don't know, go ask /v/ why it is.

File: lolwhat.png (261KB, 776x658px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 776x658px

>>30380043
>>>/v/

that-a-way, champ

>>30380180
>>30381139
Fuck off summer fags.

Is Rise of Flight any good? I wanna get my WW1 on.

File: Air War 1.webm (3MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x360px

>>30381251
It's pretty good, it's probably my next favorite flight sim after 1946. You'll probably have to invest a bit though in order to get a nice selection craft.

>>30381139
>>30380180
>/k/ weapons
>thread is about ww2 flight sims
are you two retarded?
this thread is completely related

>>30380043
Probably because it was made by Russians that didn't have the sort of legal and internal political limitations that would befall a western developer. Except for problems with Grumman when trying to get Pacific Fighters released, which prevented certain flyable and other assets from being added in the official development. It's part of the reason Cliffs of Dover didn't have any American planes, they didn't want to deal with the costs and time of dealing with those aircraft companies any more.

>>30381251
>posts /v/ thread
>gets lightly roasted for posting off-topic thread
and we're the summerfags....

>>30381301
Being in exposed cockpits at higher altitudes would suck so fucking much

File: 1365541963058.jpg (440KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1024x683px

>>30382214
Hell, everything would until the B-29 would be a nightmare, everything up till that was basically a refrigerator at 20,000 feet.

>>30382469
Temps weren't too bad in most fighters because they had a nice warm engine just a couple feet Multi-engine aircraft like P-38's and bombers were hell until they got better heating systems.