So how the fuck do I aim with this thing? At line 1 or 2?

Whatever you zero it at? The power is in your hands.

>>30370653
Lets say 100m? at 1 or 2?

>>30370609
>1
its a german #1 reticule if you feel like doing some reading

>>30370687
if you zero it at line 1, then you use that.

>>30370609
Line 1, more specifically the point at the end of the vertical post. The horizontal lines are just to orient it against canting.

>>30370706
In WW2 did they zero it at line 1 or 2?

>>30370735
the very tip of the triangle will be the most consistent for shots where you wont need to adjust the zero

>>30370735
1 m8. It's always the tip of the point or chevron.

>>30370767
>>30370770
Maybe I fucked up the zeroing, but I cant hit shit with that scope and I cant figure why.

File: 124438i_ts.jpg (110KB, 1155x1155px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 1155x1155px

>>30370784
I have a trijicon scope with a reticle like pic related. Re-zero for the very tip of the triangle and you should be good to go.

>>30370784
first things first, make sure its mounted properly

>>30370826
Its such an odd feeling when youre coming from a crosshair, because you know that this is the spot where it will hit, and not above it.

>>30370854
Yea I will check it again.

>>30370784
Your own words indicate you don't know what "zeroing" is.

Pick a distance, like 50 or 100yds
Place large clean target with something like a small golf ball size sticker on it
Shoot 3 shots holding on the tip of reticle directly on center of target
Check were the hit, hopefully all near each other in a tight group,
Make conservative adjustments to bring group in the direction
Shoot 3 more shots, holding reticle in same spot as last time
Repeat until your 3 shot group is hitting where you're holding

1, tard

OP might just not be consistent his grouping, if that's the case, then he's fucked till he gets better

You can zero it wherever you want In the scope, best results come from 1 though

I can't even look at that reticle without wanting to vomit courtesy of trying to sight in a completely off PU optic.

>>30370888
well you can put the point right on, instead above slightly below. so the tip of the arrow is the point of impact

File: 1462915070729.png (2MB, 4738x2874px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4738x2874px

>>30370688
What he said